@maluslayer46@proto7ytq@realAngelii You confuse the exoteric with the esoteric. And no, I'm not talking about Brahma; but the principle Brahman (of Vedanta), which in different sects is also known as Sadaśiva, Nārayana or Ādi Parāśakti.
@proto7ytq@realAngelii We believe only in one god - Brahman who manifests existence itself; worshipping only the manifestations. O' Munafoq; Our hatred of Muslims stems from both their exoteric culture and their metaphysical deference towards Sirhindi and his dualisms; over non-dual Tasawwuf.
One of the most terrible aspects of postmodern culture is using fun/excitement as the key criterion to evaluate someone's life, experience or a literary work. Human values that have endured millennia stand for nothing, if it's not exciting in their grotesque way.
@rupam811@rockhearted_ Lakshmana and Sita are not bounded by Rama's oath for abstaining from Meat. He could have very well hunted for their nourishment, whilst he was busy eating roots, fruits, tubers, honey and wild greens.
@marshymooner@rockhearted_ He doesn't "throw his wife in fire" retard. Sarga 114 shows him telling Vibhishana to bring her in front of him bathed, with the ornaments and cosmetics, like the last time he saw her, and she appears before him in robes fit for a Queen (of Lanka), and not her vana-vastra.
Seeing Nick Land on Twitter Like this makes me thank God that my favourite philosophers lived and died before they had the chance to be mind-raped by the internet as a boomer.
According to leftists, people who want to actively destroy Hinduism, paint targets on the backs of American Hindus for persecution, refuse to speak a single word against attacks on Hindus anywhere in the world, least of all in America, are their only acceptable representatives.
In original Valmiki Ramayana its actually the opposite.
Ram was ok with Sita being without veil appearing in front of people. (SS 1)
But as per Mandodari it was Ravana who would find it offensive if his wives are seen unveiled by others (SS2)
These among the most 'AASI' groups out there. A little bit about their tradition, regarding their mythological origin from Lord Shiva himself, and their deities and magical rites.
@Siradhvaja It's more akin to American-ness (insofar as the local cultures coexist as a string of pearls within the greater national culture). Comparing it to Frenchness - a Parisian pretense; effectively is a false equivalence over al.
One of the most interesting papers on numismatics I have read is a farmer tilling his land finds an imitation of a gold Kushan coin (Huviska) in his field in Radhanagar, Jajpur, Odisha. The full paper (1/n)
Land's philosophy is a continuity, and logical end, of the Popperian worldview. That is, a direct attack against traditional metaphysics. The mysticism expressed in Land's accelerationism is a Faustian material mysticism, based on a horizontal inverted metaphysics.
Lovely to hear this from the hack who hasn't contributed to anything other than being trapped in a simulacra of processualism that seek to alienate others and epistemically enslave them to be individuated automatons. If only he had read Weil and saw the need to outgrow it...
Beware of those who preach too much good, argues philosopher Slavoj Žižek.
Even Buddhism, the school of thought most dedicated to ending suffering, has ideologies that can be used to justify it.
Watch Žižek and Yuval Noah Harari debate good and evil in "Nature: Friend or foe?" here. https://t.co/fvA1QZMUbP
I’d like to recommend this essay by Borges. Our current interest in automated language models speech has created an irony of sorts. Many of us often believe these machines are able to think, much as Llull hoped his machine could in the thirteenth century. Around the end of the++
Zizek along with Chul-Han has perfected the neoliberalisation of once dangerous and extraordinary ideas by distilling them into short annual pamphlets printed for urbanites to put on their coffee tables before dropping them off at an Oxfam without having read them.