.@CarbonBrief has compiled data from 70+ peer-reviewed climate studies to show how #climatechange is projected to affect the world by regions. Check out the interactive summary here: https://t.co/FeyIAUbQ5X
@cherry_weed@CarbonBrief@daisydunnesci@tomoprater@joejgoodman Many thanks for your kind words, Ruth. On the impact maps, they're giving a broad indication of changes – it would be a whole project in itself to catalogue specific impacts for every location!
@TLRailUK Hi, what is happening with the 9:40 from PBO to KGX? We’re on the train on the platform, but not going anywhere and the board just says “delayed”.
That popular graph suggesting Europe has actually had a good year for wildfires is misleading
- data encompass Russia, including Siberia
- can include fires deliberately lit to manage cropland
- area burned by wildfires across EU is second only to 2022
https://t.co/GaCqRCFHNW
NEW – Factcheck: No, Europe’s heatwaves are not being ‘caused’ by declining air pollution
✍️ written by @rtmcswee
💬 with comments from @bjornhs, @erichfischer and Pedro Roldan-Gomez
Read here ➡️ https://t.co/CGQm1LS90a
The arc of the scenario universe is long, but it bends inevitably toward more realistic emissions.
A new paper outlining the emissions scenarios we will be using in the upcoming IPCC AR7 report notes that "the CMIP6 high emission levels (quantified by SSP5-8.5) have become implausible".
If you want to know more about how we established that there is a statistically significant increase in the speed of global warming since 2015, @CarbonBrief explains it nicely.
For such a softly spoken guy, Ben doesn't hold back on the Trump administration:
"Insane. That’s the only word for it. Removing our ability to measure and monitor how the world around us is changing, makes no sense whatsoever."
Are you a journalist covering COP30 looking for new and diverse sources?
Check out the Global South Climate Database.
This publicly available, searchable database features 1000+ climate scientists and experts from the global south.
🌍🔗 https://t.co/26PPUL1n41
Here's our annual look at COP delegates:
Top story: no US delegation for the 1st time in COP history
Also: ~56k people registered, so no big drop-off despite accommodation issues in Belém
(Caveat: these are provisional figures)
Also also: most "virtual" delegates ever
#COP30
In a UN speech today, President Trump said that "all of these [climate] predictions were wrong".
Back in 2019 I led a research effort to digitize old climate model projections and assess how well they did. Turns out they got future warming pretty spot on!
Well this is embarrassing for "newspaper of record" The Times:
Its coverage of EVs is the most misleading among UK titles, with 52% of pieces in H1 2024 containing at least one misleading statement
(The Daily Telegraph "wins" on volume, with 44 misleading pieces)
1/4
The recent DOE climate science report misrepresents the work of many researchers. Carbon Brief asked those cited to review the parts of the report where their work was used, and we collectively found 100+ misleading or false statements: https://t.co/9iXsKMejsk
And then @thetimes, revealing its credulity, has followed with its own piece that does exactly the same thing (just 2 hours later):
https://t.co/NpyQcBmJiI
More net-zero misinformation in the @Telegraph
It claims that a proposed scheme to put the cost of recycling onto packaging producers, rather than local councils, is a “net-zero glass tax”.
It is about waste management, not net-zero.
Somehow, this made it onto the frontpage 🤦
Here's more on the “Packaging extended producer responsibility” scheme: https://t.co/HdNI0DQZl9
I suspect the Telegraph knows that the connection to net-zero is bogus as it only mentions the phrase in its headline & opening line.
Link here: https://t.co/WlEDJjs7I8
Chart: The rise, fall and rise of UK nuclear power over eight decades
Written by @DrSimEvans. Data analysis by Ho Woo Nam. Visuals by @tomoprater.
Read here ➡️ https://t.co/lNzTBKsJ98