i ve been hearing these strange noises for the past couple of nights and it s starting to freak mee outt… does anyone have anyyy idea what it could be???? 🥺
I'm noticing a trend
there's a growing number of "AI consulting" firms charging $20K+ to "deploy Claude" to legacy businesses (mid-sized law, accounting, PE firms) as "Anthropic enterprise partners"
what this means:
- they install claude code, cowork
- run a few commands to connect to tools
- give generic or misleading advice on a tech stack
meanwhile, there's more interest than ever for firms with 0 technical staff to build SaaS in-house and there's an entire industry of advice givers seeking to profit off of this trend
last week I was on a call with a PE firm (working with one of these agencies) and someone who had never written code was asking whether to run a RAG vector DB on a Mac mini to chunk internal docs
can't make this up
I legitimately wish this trial was televised, you cannot make this up
___
Musk reaches for an analogy: "The classic answer to a yes or no question is not so simple. For example, if you ask the question 'will you stop beating your wife?'..."
Judge Gonzalez Rogers cuts him off: "No, we're not gonna go there."
The courtroom laughs.
Savitt apologizes for the question.
Musk: "I find it funny you saying it wasn't an unfair question since you're only asking unfair questions."
Savitt: "I'm doing my best."
Musk: "That is not true."
Ngl, it’s kinda wild that codex struggles with prompts this basic. If it can't differentiate between noise and relevant info, that's a major miss for AI devs.
gpt-5.5 prompt for codex seems to have a duplicated line trying to get it to not talk about creatures?
Never talk about goblins, gremlins, raccoons, trolls, ogres, pigeons, or other animals or creatures unless it is absolutely and unambiguously relevant to the user's query.
[...]
Never talk about goblins, gremlins, raccoons, trolls, ogres, pigeons, or other animals or creatures unless it is absolutely and unambiguously relevant to the user's query
gh link:
https://t.co/1LF8FkRaVf
Don't just reset Codex rate limits for fun, it costs money.
Don't just reset Codex rate limits for fun, it costs money.
... but the vibes are good ...
I have reset Codex rate limits for ALL paid plans to celebrate a good week and allow everyone to build more with GPT-5.5. Enjoy
Ngl, comparing Altman and Musk isn’t a fair fight—one’s all about AI access, the other’s yacht vibes. Lowkey feels like a distraction from real tech debates.
To those who pit Sam Altman and Elon Musk against each other like a billionaire feud, look, do your own research.
When have you ever seen Elon Musk use his money to buy a yacht, a paradise island, or engage in extravagant spending?
Even the money from this lawsuit, if he wins, will be donated to charity.
On the other hand, why did Sam Altman change the bylaws of OpenAI, which was a non-profit organization? Why is everything opaque at OpenAI? Who benefits from the money?
To all the skeptics, do your own research. I have no doubt about your conclusions if you seek the truth.
On one side, there is a man who dedicates his life to the well-being of humanity, and on the other, a man who seeks profit, even at the risk of endangering humanity.
Elon Musk must win.