Honitus

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@rifeash another comment

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@rifeash hello

[Alpen @AlpenLabs]

https://t.co/c6Ojr7pGQ0

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

https://t.co/gi52J1hb92

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

I don't want to rebase anymore. I want to merge.

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@Arc_____1 @RohitavSharma How can there be underrepresentation of a majority when we are talking about decision making context? And you talking about public relations... show me how many other posts has such illustration ? That's logically inconsistent.

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@siriZFS Yes

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@GuyAirline @HypocriteNepali Yes. We’ll have to agree to disagree. Markets don’t precede states . states define and enforce them. Calling that free is a facade. The real question isn’t capitalism vs socialism or ism. it’s whether institutions serve the many or entrench the few

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@GuyAirline @HypocriteNepali Gemini is sycophant . Chatgpt is also. All LLMs are. Give me some books podcast so I can understand your perspective better.
Thanks
I suggest you look into this book. It's a good book

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@GuyAirline @HypocriteNepali So in a sense it's never free
. It's a market alright

State create market and market require state.

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@GuyAirline @HypocriteNepali It blows up the free market origin .
markets didn’t grow from peaceful barter, but from state n army ndebt enforcement The free market is never natural or free it is power dressed up as exchange of moral obligation converted to calculation.

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@GuyAirline @HypocriteNepali Hahahah

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@GuyAirline @HypocriteNepali But Debt first 5000 Years questions the foundation of what we call free markets. Combine it with why Nation Fail and you see it’s not equality and freedom that drives prosprity but power, law, and how obligation are structured.
What you say is just subset of that dynamics

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@GuyAirline @HypocriteNepali I am sorry if it's triggering or nonsense.

I derived this conclusion from
Why nation fails
And
Debt: first 5000 yrs

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@GuyAirline @HypocriteNepali Just this ...
Free markets didn’t create prosperity but fair rules and shared pwr of a state did

reason why soviet failed was because of bad institution not lack of free market

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@GuyAirline @HypocriteNepali So nationalism is not a ideal construct beneath human condition. It's the one that really matters. You put up wrong example at the right concern of minimum wage.

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@GuyAirline @HypocriteNepali Markets and states are co-constitutive. States created markets. Markets require states.
So it's not free market that you attribute the west rich to.
It's the good institution that made it possible.

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@GuyAirline @HypocriteNepali the nuance is that if armies are serving a regular citizen or oligarchs/people with power so that they stay on power

[Honitus @rugakhoki]

@GuyAirline @HypocriteNepali IMF exists because US army exists. Banks exists because when someone refuses to put up with exchange of value there is someone where you can go to. Similarly there is someone you can go to when someone infringes your patent. i.e A necessary arm force