@FluentInFinance Starbucks decline was not one event. It was slower service, weaker value, more rivals, and stores that no longer matched how people live and work
Grains, beans, nuts, and seeds are the weakest part of the argument. These foods contain anti-nutrients (phytate, lectins, protease inhibitors) that can reduce absorption of zinc, iron, and other minerals the brain needs. That chemistry is real. However, large observational studies and some trials associate whole grains, legumes, and nuts with better—not worse—cognitive and cardiovascular outcomes (Mediterranean-diet literature, nut-consumption studies showing increased cerebral blood flow). https://t.co/WYzbrtnbxk Most nutrition scientists therefore treat them as net-positive for most people, not as “some of the least nutritious, riskiest plant foods.” Ede’s view is a minority metabolic-psychiatry position, not the consensus.
Galloway is noted for his annual predictions in business, tech, and politics, which he self-audits transparently in his newsletter. His overall accuracy is estimated at around 50%, akin to a coin flip, based on his own retrospectives (e.g., 6/14 in a 2017 review and mixed results in 2021). This aligns with Philip Tetlock’s “hedgehog” archetype … experts who make bold, narrative-driven calls but often underperform due to overconfidence and ideological lenses.
Did you take into consideration that self-driving cars will hurt these groups hard and they will all push back:
• Personal injury lawyers (auto accidents are a huge share of civil cases)
• Cities & towns that rely on speeding tickets, parking fines, and towing revenue
• Parking lots & garages (demand could drop 50-90% with shared AVs)
• Truck, taxi, rideshare, and delivery drivers (millions of jobs)
• Auto insurance companies (far fewer claims)
• Collision repair shops & body shops
• Driving schools & instructors
• Towing companies and valet services
Fewer crashes + autonomous fleets = major disruption for anyone whose business depends on human error or private car ownership.