@Williambalono@WallStreetApes My mom worked her entire life. Then she got stage 4 cancer. Because she worked for a small business they were not required to preserve her job while she was getting chemotherapy. She was willing to work but no one wants to hire someone who is very clearly about to die.
@TheCoinCollect8@allgarbled What do you mean nature didn’t intend this? Nature intended for you to have kids until you’re no longer fertile. It’s not unusual to have kids in your 40s, it’s just unusual in the context of history to start in your 40s.
@allgarbled They don’t actually want to have kids with the resources they had at 25. They want to go back in time and have kids younger with the resources they have at 35.
@Vignogna5042 @DrNeilStone There are upwards of 3000 sudden unexplained infant deaths per year. Some will coincidentally happen on the day of a vaccination.
@Vignogna5042 @DrNeilStone This isn’t the universe of SIDS deaths, it’s VAERS. You’re more likely to report a SIDS death to VAERS if it coincides with a vaccine. If it’s a month later you don’t report it. This isn’t the right way to think about this data.
@DrNeilStone Science deniers love that graph over time of vaccines and autism - now do it for SIDS…. Notice they don’t because it doesn’t fit their narrative.
@ima_political @ChefDizzyD@DefiyantlyFree And this was during the period where you said basically anyone could get Medicaid and she lived in an expansion state. So something doesn’t add up about your claims.
@ima_political @ChefDizzyD@DefiyantlyFree It’s ridiculous because it takes a long time to get Medicaid so I guess the best option would have been to let my mom be evicted and homeless while getting chemo during a pandemic.
@ChefDizzyD@DefiyantlyFree It’s very difficult to get Medicaid. We tried for my mom who was living on social security and had stage 4 cancer. They denied her because I helped her with her rent while she was getting chemo by depositing money in a joint account.
@Acyn One day all these MAHAs will have someone in their life with cancer and they will come across a promising development on google scholar and ask their MD about it, only to realize that the Trump administration stopped funding research and there is no new treatment to try.
@Acyn Just want to understand. If there’s a new medicine that improves upon an existing medication, you’re going to force people to completely forego any treatment? That’s unethical and no one will participate and no new drugs will ever come to market.
@krassenstein I’m kind of shocked people are OK with yelling at ANY 5 year old this way. If a 5 year old was going through my diaper bag, my response would be “hey buddy, do you need something?” The N-word aside, this is an abusive response. Are her kids OK with her?
@RetsefL It seems like people who engage more w/prescription meds (ie preexisting conditions) might be more likely to choose Pfizer because it’s a familiar brand to them. That introduces important selection bias you don’t control for. I’m sure you know that and are ignoring it. why?
@jsm2334 I know where I live you often had a choice between brands. People who engage more with prescription meds might have preferred Pfizer because it’s more familiar, causing selection bias and the observed results.
@JR4484 @Wyatt_Wriots @eem_soo32301 @atrupar You’re describing an observational study. The problem is that people who don’t vaccinate tend to be different from people who do. Even so- here’s a gigantic observational study that shows no increased risk of autism. https://t.co/1UoPjh5aIF