@chrishume_@returntoquality Been going down the rabbit hole on underwear and socks. Almost zero options tha don’t contain some type of elastane or polyester
@jbchoknows@FlyingWontonzz A bit misleading imo but all good. Take care. Didn’t mean to come out harsh but there’s a group of guys in FF that do this year after year.
@SolBrah@coookwithchris@oasishealthapp Chris I love you bro, but seems like oasis can be paid off for better scores. Any truth- how is something with SLS given a 98/100. Meyers is total greenwashing
@coookwithchris@oasishealthapp Respectfully, how is this product (Mrs Meyers) rated at 98/100?
Many toxic chemical processed ingredients I wouldn’t put anywhere near my dishes
@Dennis_Porter_ I saw a comment today from Patrick Witt that it made it seem like it will be about the custody of the SBR. If this announcement is not about accumulating if afraid it’s gonna be poorly received.
This MRI study on young kids just exposed something terrifying:
They scanned the brains of 60 children aged 3–5 — including 5-year-old Rose — and found interactive screen time is causing measurable loss of white matter in their developing brains. Even just 2 hours a day is linked to impaired neural connectivity, language, and literacy development.
Professor Mike Nagel (neuroscientist and father) said his first reaction was simply: “Wow… I was not anticipating seeing anything like that.”
We’re physically changing children’s brains before they even start school — and the damage is visible on scans.
This one actually unsettled me. I’ve always suspected too much screen time was bad, but seeing real white matter loss in toddlers hits different.
Parents of little ones — has this kind of research changed how much screen time you allow?