@PhantomBlack699@CGasparino He’s not a journalist or reporter. He is a fraud!
He’s paid to creative narratives that scare retail from trading just like Andrew Left. 📺 https://t.co/nTFe4xJt4x🎧
MMTLP NBH MMAT #FOIAdenials#FINRAfraud
There have been a growing number of requests for a consolidated view of all Congressional and SEC correspondence currently archived in the Dashboard. To support that, I’m sharing an updated snapshot of the letters we have on file so far.
This represents the most complete collection available to the community at this time, and it continues to expand as new documents are released through FOIA appeals, agency responses, and shareholder submissions.
Below is a preview of the current dataset. Hope this provides clarity and helps everyone stay aligned as we continue pushing for transparency and accountability.
The work continues and thanks to our community members efforts.
Focus.
MMTLP MMAT TRCH NBH
Maybe one should FOIA the communications of MS. Karina Dorin...
"Karina Dorin is a Staff Attorney in the Division of Corporation Finance at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In her role within the Office of Energy and Transportation, she is responsible for reviewing corporate filings, such as registration statements and prospectuses, to ensure compliance with federal securities laws."
MIGHT the responses tell us what she said to NBH to get them to withdraw the S-1 Sub Rights Offering the FIF Member Firms were so afraid of....hmmm.
Anyone investigating The MMTLP Fiasco may surely want to interview MS. DORIN in addition to David Saltiel, Erik Gerding and Karl Hiller. #RICO #Conspiracy
@SECGov@USTreasury@SecScottBessent@DirectorPulte@FBIDirectorKash
They cannot stop what is coming...
🚨 NEW SEC FOIA RESPONSE 🚨
FOIA 26-00651-FOIA
This one matters.
This FOIA requested records showing communications/referrals between SEC Corporation Finance and SEC Trading & Markets regarding Next Bridge Hydrocarbons’ S-1 activity.
The response shows something important:
Once FIF entered the discussion, the tone and substance appear to shift.
Before FIF:
SEC / NBH S-1 communications were largely about registration mechanics, eligibility, disclosure, and process.
After FIF steps in:
The discussion turns to operational market-structure concerns:
• shares on loan
• lending broker-dealers unable to recover shares
• customer protections under SEC Rule 15c3-3
• IRA/tax consequences
• transfer-agent capacity
• whether shareholders should be forced out of bank/broker/nominee holding
One FIF point is especially hard to ignore:
“Because of the prior FINRA trading halt, there are shares on loan that lending broker-dealers cannot recover.”
That is not retail speculation.
That is an industry group raising operational concerns to the SEC about the Next Bridge S-1 process.
And FIF’s recommendation?
Do not force participating customers out of bank, broker-dealer, or nominee custody — because preserving that structure would allow for “future reconciliation of outstanding stock loans.”
Read that again.
Future reconciliation of outstanding stock loans.
This FOIA does not prove every theory.
But it does prove the S-1 issue was not just routine paperwork.
It involved broker-held shares, loaned shares, customer protections, transfer mechanics, and reconciliation concerns.
That is exactly why MMTLP shareholders have been asking questions for years.
#MMTLP #MMAT #NextBridge #FOIA #SEC #FINRA
MMTLP - VERY IMPORTANT!!!
The time has come to submit your FOIA requests to the database if you haven’t already contacted your freedom of information act reviewer to inquire about your FOIA status. Please do so promptly, as we aim to have as many FOIA responses in the database within the next two to three weeks. This presents a significant opportunity, and we must take advantage without delay. MMTLP 💪💪💪
You may have heard that the Supreme Court overturned Chevron deference, the doctrine that told judges to side with agencies' interpretations of their own authority.
The case that helped do it? This one.
Under a new rule, Atlantic herring fishermen off Rhode Island’s coast were required not only to carry government officials on board, known as "At-Sea Monitors," to regulate the fishermen while they worked, but the cost of these officials, estimated at $710 per day, would be charged to the fishermen, an amount that could exceed what they make in profit from catching fish in a day.
NCLA represented the fishermen who challenged the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) rule forcing them to pay, and we took Relentless v. Department of Commerce all the way to the Supreme Court.
In a 6-3 SCOTUS decision, NCLA and the fishermen won the case, Chevron came down, and the First Circuit's decision upholding NOAA's fishermen-fund-the-monitors rule was vacated.
Now NCLA is asking the First Circuit to reel in the rule, once and for all 🎣
https://t.co/5UkPm74dDW
Harsh words lightly thrown. Why’d you crawl out of your hole? Shorties summon you?
🩳🩳🩳🩳🩳🩳🩳🩳🩳🩳🩳🩳
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Grok this phony fudster for yourself:
“No, Charlie Gasparino (the Fox Business senior correspondent and @CGasparino) is not a Pulitzer Award-winning journalist. He has never won a Pulitzer Prize, nor was he ever an official nominee or finalist. https://t.co/4yRjNc01uW
In 2002, while he was at The Wall Street Journal, his editors internally submitted his work for consideration in the beat reporting category. However, that is not the same as being a Pulitzer nominee. The Pulitzer Prize Board and its juries select only three “nominated finalists” per category from thousands of entries each year. Gasparino’s submission never made it that far, and he does not appear on the official list of 2002 finalists (the winner was Gretchen Morgenson of The New York Times). https://t.co/4yRjNc01uW
In 2012, investigative reporter Bill Dedman publicly called out Gasparino (along with a few others) for repeatedly describing himself as a “Pulitzer Prize nominee” in his Fox Business bio, book publisher materials, speaker profiles, and even a CNBC promotional video. The Pulitzer organization itself discourages this wording for mere submissions, stating it misleads the public. https://t.co/zIOv11jrQy Fox Business later updated his official biography to the more accurate phrasing that his work “was submitted for the Pulitzer” (or similar wording in current bios). https://t.co/zR9Ypuev3R “ - Grok
SH🩳RT & Broke! “Ha!”