The most advanced AI is now "too dangerous" for the public to use.
Too dangerous for independent scientists. For small labs. For you.
But safe for government and its approved partners.
The same government that funded gain-of-function research and hid it.
🧵
Hello Alex- Thanks for your balanced comment. A few points to consider.
As you probably know, usually posts from "HHS Rapid Response" or
@RobertKennedyJr
are written by Stefanie Spear, who operates as a cloaked/surreptitious HHS Press Sec, particularly since Danker was run out (has he been replaced yet?). She imagines herself as a brilliant spin doctor. Dunning-Krueger. "Total BS" is a typical Stefanie response. RFK generally does not use that term in my experience, she routinely does.
I identified this as an active rumor. It is very actively circulating among West Wing and Senior HHS employees. I have heard it from multiple independent sources. That is not "Total BS", it is fact.
That said, if you heard the "Total BS" quote directly from RFK, then so it is, and I do not dispute your comment.
Do I claim to know whether this is more than an active rumor? No. If I could, I would have so stated. Is this consistent with known and documented patterns of behavior with other cabinet-level "replacements" under this admin and 45? Absolutely yes.
I completely concur with your analysis - time will tell. An active rumor it is, that is not "Total BS".
Is there a significant spin response campaign in progress, yes, clearly.
There may be a Psy-op campaign in progress. AMA made the strange and politically immature public comment about "going to war" with the secretary. The American Academy of Pediatrics is clearly doing what it can to sabotage. "Pharma" and "Bio" are also active. The favorite partner of the mRNA lobby (Cassidy) has just been primaried.
The individuals sharing this rumor with me may have been surreptitiously influenced by some third party chaos agent. It is DC. That is how some play the game.
I draw no conclusions, only observe, analyze and report. But whether this is an active rumor is not "Total BS".
I suggest that the assertion that it is actually meets the criteria. I completely concur with your analysis - time will tell.
But active rumor is not "Total BS".
Hello Alex- Thanks for your balanced comment. A few points to consider. As you probably know, usually posts from "HHS Rapid Response" or
@RobertKennedyJr are written by Stefanie Spear, who operates as a cloaked/surreptitious HHS Press Sec, particularly since Danker was run out (has he been replaced yet?). She imagines herself as a brilliant spin doctor. Dunning-Krueger. "Total BS" is a typical Stefanie response. RFK generally does not use that term in my experience, she routinely does.
I identified this as an active rumor. It is very actively circulating among West Wing and Senior HHS employees. I have heard it from multiple independent sources. That is not "Total BS", it is fact.
That said, if you heard the "Total BS" quote directly from RFK, then so it is, and I do not dispute your comment.
Do I claim to know whether this is more than an active rumor? No. If I could, I would have so stated.
Is this consistent with known and documented patterns of behavior with other cabinet-level "replacements" under this admin and 45? Absolutely yes.
I completely concur with your analysis - time will tell. An active rumor it is, that is not "Total BS".
Is there a significant spin response campaign in progress, yes, clearly. I completely concur with your analysis - time will tell.
There may be a Psy-op campaign in progress. AMA made the strange and politically immature public comment about "going to war" with the secretary. The American Academy of Pediatrics is clearly doing what it can to sabotage. "Pharma" and "Bio" are also active. The favorite partner of the mRNA lobby (Cassidy) has just been primaried.
The individuals sharing this rumor with me may have been surreptitiously influenced by some third party chaos agent. It is DC. That is how some play the game.
I draw no conclusions, only observe, analyze and report. But whether this is an active rumor is not "Total BS".
I suggest that the assertion that it is actually meets the criteria. I completely concur with your analysis - time will tell.
But active rumor is not "Total BS".
Robert Kennedy Jr. has done more as HHS Secretary than any HHS Secretary in my lifetime. He is cleaning up the food supply. He is removing chemical dyes from children's food, pulling heavy metals out of baby food, investigating microplastics and forever chemicals. And he is working to bring the childhood vaccine schedule down from 54 vaccines to 26.
That isn't a small thing.
@RobertKennedyJr
The public rationale is safety. The practical effect is the concentration of power.
Before surrendering these tools to the governing class, ask what it has done to earn the trust.
The honest answer: not much.
Full essay: https://t.co/mBOxkQ8LHb
The most advanced AI is now "too dangerous" for the public to use.
Too dangerous for independent scientists. For small labs. For you.
But safe for government and its approved partners.
The same government that funded gain-of-function research and hid it.
🧵
So the policy does not remove the danger.
It concentrates the capability among states and large institutions, and hopes our rivals play along.
Americans and independent researchers get the restrictions. Foreign programs get the head start.
@RWMaloneMD The most family-oriented people in America apparently all work in presidential administrations.
They discover it right around the time they're asked to leave.
Today we filed a motion asking the First Circuit to expedite our appeal of the district court's order in the AAP lawsuit that left ACIP—the nation's vaccine advisory committee—without a quorum. AAP opposes our motion.
I've been consistent from day one: I do not want to take vaccines away from anyone. Our policy changes preserved access and coverage.
But the court's order has left ACIP unable to carry out its core responsibilities. As a result, the committee cannot issue new recommendations, review newly approved vaccines, or complete important work ahead of the fall flu season.
A functioning ACIP is essential to ensuring that vaccine recommendations remain grounded in evidence and available to the families and providers who rely on them.
Families, physicians, insurers, and public health programs deserve certainty—not paralysis.
That's why we're asking for expedited review. Our appeal seeks to restore a functioning ACIP so the vaccine recommendation process can continue, and families, physicians, and public health programs have the guidance they need.