Ryan Leo

ima save everyone

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

@Remzztrades Smoked that one hehe

[Remz @Remzztrades]

I tailed these. Only reason is we haven’t seen a blow off the top move yet. This isn’t entirely crazy. Infact if it goes. These can run 200-300% off IV expansion

Risky. But you can’t ignore a max striker.

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

@Loverism__ God I love women. These posts are so stupid. I love gay people and human rights and being a gentleman and being rich and prosperous and supporting my partner cuz I’m a real man and my daddy told me he loved me growing up. I’m also jacked. You guys need love.

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

@WhiteHouse Yall shot a nurse in the back

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

@Kurrco Can’t wait for this to be illegal or age gated

[zachariah @airtightangelic]

pauly d was 29-30 years old when the first season of jersey shore was filmed yet y’all wanna act like grannies at 27! get your ass in the club!

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

@chrissssjohnson @DigiDollarsBTM @ayceATH What happened with your back? This stuff curing injuries too?

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

@Remzztrades King

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

@ArtemisConsort God ur such a shitty person. Ppl that get gender affirming surgery are happy. End of story. Let ppl do what makes them happy. It’s our right as Americans.

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

@spacemnke So helpful thank you

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

@SJosephBurns Price

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

@ASavageChristia @MissGinaDarling Christians made up that “only god can judge me” thing so that other humans wouldn’t realize they’re terrible people. Wake up dude - you got a blindfold over you

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

I just found out what Fat Sals is…you guys eat this stuff? It looks hella good but zamnnn

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

@Remzztrades Love these real talk posts - found APP and AMAT by myself last night.

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

@edgaralandough Totally agreed. I’m not too political I just want the country to thrive. Too much suffering. Want us back to a masculine country that protects the weak. Too much cruelty conflated with masculinity now.

[Sam Parikh @smartertrader]

Released SAms fair value tool to private twitter. Man it’s insane. 5+ yrs in the building Will release to the masses soon.

Working to get it on everyone’s screen thru the brokers. That’s a long process. Let’s see if we can bang 10k users that love it.

Will be 99 bucks if your a member of smartertrading411. If not 149….

Initial beta will be 49 bucks for 1st 2 months then goes 99.

This will be a 1 time price. If you ever leave it pops to 179

Everyone that sign up for the 49 will be grandfathered into the 99 forever as long as you never leave.

Today the tool spit out spot 720. Doubled in a hr.

Once you know what the fair value price is. You have the edge. Every market maker will start to tumble. Market makers have been creating silly prices to rip people off now they are smoked.

Will release it here Monday.

Please retweet. Oh and I go look
At who retweets and who doesn’t.

I have answered everyone questions forever. That changes with people that don’t retweet.

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

@EliteOptions2 Happened to me literally today. Entered PLTR last Monday and missed the move Thursday/Friday. Saw Tsla today and struck. Great win.

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

@Remzztrades Good callout saw my setup n sniped

[Ryan Leo @ryanl3o]

He’s not just a racist, and a sex criminal, he’s also just plain terrible at his job.

[Special Situations 🌐 Research Newsletter (Jay) @SpecialSitsNews]

The Trump administration has filed a notice that it is appealing the tariff ruling. The US Supreme Court may ultimately have the final say in the high-stakes case that could impact trillions of dollars in global trade.

The decision is one of the biggest setbacks in court for Trump amid a wave of lawsuits over executive orders in which he is testing the limits of presidential power. Others are challenging Trump’s mass firings of federal workers, restrictions on birthright citizenship and efforts to slash federal spending already approved by Congress.

Trump’s executive order invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to justify the sweeping global tariffs. The law grants the president authority over a variety of financial transactions during certain emergencies, typically with sanctions.

Trump said he was permitted to use the emergency law to implement tariffs because the nation’s “large and persistent” annual trade deficits across the globe constituted “an unusual and extraordinary threat” to national security and the economy.

The panel of judges concluded that Trump’s initial executive order announcing global tariffs and subsequent order dealing additional levies on countries that retaliated both exceeded the president’s authority under the emergency law.

A third executive order, hitting Mexico and Canada with tariffs over concerns about drug trafficking, were deemed to be illegal by the court because those levies do not ultimately attempt address the trafficking problem.

A complaint brought by a conservative legal advocacy group on behalf of small businesses alleged Trump is misusing the law, essentially basing his tariffs on a bogus emergency.

The Liberty Justice Center said the US trade deficits are “neither an emergency nor an unusual or extraordinary threat.” Even if it were, the group says, the emergency law doesn’t allow a president to impose across-the-board tariffs.

The US trade court is part of the nation’s federal court system and was created by Congress to handle specialized disputes around trade, including tariffs.

Decisions are appealed on the same track as rulings from district courts, meaning a challenge by Trump would go to a federal appeals court and then the US Supreme Court. As with other federal courts, the judges are appointed by sitting presidents.

Republicans in Congress have advanced legislation that would give the president wide authority to impose so-called reciprocal tariffs, but concern about the impact of Trump’s widespread levies is expected to limit the appetite for moving that measure now.

The Trump administration argued in court filings that the plaintiffs are improperly questioning his executive orders, “inviting judicial second-guessing of the president’s judgment.”

The government had asked the panel of judges to issue only a narrow ruling if they were to rule in favor of the plaintiffs, but the court concluded that wasn’t possible given the nature of the tariffs.

“There is no question here of narrowly tailored relief; if the challenged tariff orders are unlawful as to plaintiffs they are unlawful as to all,” the panel said.

The court said it didn’t need to weigh in on the plaintiffs’ argument that Trump had declared a false national emergency, saying that argument is moot for now because the president had used the law improperly regardless.

The cases are V.O.S. Selections v. Trump, 25-cv-00066, and Oregon v. Trump, 25-cv-00077, US Court of International Trade (Manhattan).