@markgoldbridge you agree with nothing, just toxic. pity so many sheep listen to you, think the club deserve credit with signings and pulling the plug on Amorim
@markgoldbridge happy hes not going its good for united, hes done well this season, deserves credit for keeping fit, just typical toxic goldbridge, but toxic sells,
@markgoldbridge unsubscribed, who are you to tell someone who's spent billions of there hard earned money to resign for giving there view on something,
@markgoldbridge@UnitedStandMUFC How's he pushing them on to our fan base, it's wasn't through the club, he has his right to his own opinion no matter if he's a shareholder or not, everyone can think for themselves and should do
@piersmorgan its poor language definitely, but everyone jumps on that instead of the points he's trying to make, we're more worried about language used than the actual problems he's talking about.
@markgoldbridge you think if he was playing good football with a good win rate he'd be sacked for saying what he said, wise up, its a results business, and he simply wasn't good enough. but the board have alot to answer for too, but that doesn't excuse Amorim
@markgoldbridge 36.92% win rate come on!! board have alot to answer for but that's just no where near good enough, squad needs work but that's ridiculous
@markgoldbridge let's be honest he was backed with near £200m, he spent most of it on 2 number 10s when we already had 3, the best no 10 we have he plays in centre midfield, terrible win ratio and terrible football
@bethTmufc The board are watching the same awful football we are watching at home, no style of play, awful defensive subs while chasing a win at home, they have even right to be getting on his back, isn't good enough
@markgoldbridge That doesn't excuse Amorim for the poor results, we have a squad who should be doing alot better and be playing better football, he got the 2 No10's he wanted, a good young striker and keeper. He wanted Bruno as a centre midfielder instead of rebuilding the midfield.