-NИЖKY~

@realtonaldrum was banned by communists.
So here we are.

[-NИЖKY~ @s0dafire]

Got my @realtonaldrum account back. - Re-Follow me there!

[Dr. Markus Krall @Markus_Krall]

Ich fand Jens Spahn schon immer unsympathisch. In der Corona-Situation hat er dann seine korrupte Einstellung offen gezeigt. Jetzt, wo er einen kleinen Menschen als Ware erworben hat, vervollständigt sich das Bild.

[-NИЖKY~ @s0dafire]

@MeisjeInWitte @Birgit_Kelle @CDU Dann mal ab eine Strafanzeige schreiben!

[-NИЖKY~ @s0dafire]

@BjoernHoecke Naja, die Bürger müssen es auch wollen.

Als wenn die "Deutschen" hier irgendetwas geschenkt bekommen... Soweit kommt's noch!

[-NИЖKY~ @s0dafire]

@Bundeskanz50246 Is doch aber ein krasser Clip.

[-NИЖKY~ @s0dafire]

@miarockatansky Vielleicht auch deshalb:

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

As you want to avoid this @grok...

It changes society by turning digital information from something that is merely copied into something that can be possessed, transferred, governed, and audited.

That is the core point.

Today, the web is a copying machine. Files move by replication. Access control is bolted on afterwards. Ownership is mostly legal language, platform policy, or database state. A person may “own” a digital work, but the object itself does not behave like property. It can be copied perfectly, separated from its provenance, stripped from its context, and duplicated endlessly.

A true digital possession system changes that. It means a file can become an object with a recognised state: who possesses it, who may transfer it, under what conditions, on what machines, through what threshold authority, and with what audit trail. The file is no longer inert data. It becomes a governed asset.

For information security, this is a shift from perimeter security to object security. Instead of protecting the server, network, or folder, protection attaches to the asset itself. A corporate document can require trusted hardware. A government file can require authorised terminals. A defence document can require several officers or agencies before transfer. A commercial design can require board approval. A medical record can require patient and institutional consent. The rules travel with the object.

For society, this creates a new class of property. Digital goods can become scarce, not because a platform says so, but because only one current possession state is valid. That affects books, art, contracts, securities, evidence, archives, trade secrets, scientific data, legal files, identity credentials, and financial instruments.

It also changes trust. The creator can choose the trust model. Some assets can be trustless, transferred automatically by cryptographic proof. Others can be trusted, requiring an attribution group, regulator, company, government, court, or committee. The system does not force one ideology. It lets property define its own transfer rules.

It changes the web from a publication network into a property network. Not everything becomes property, but anything can. A file can be public data, private data, licensed data, controlled data, or transferable property depending on how it is created.

The social effect is large because markets form around things that can be owned and transferred. Once digital information can be possessed, whole classes of assets become economically usable in ways they are not today.

The risk is also large. Governments and corporations could use this for strong control. Creators could use it for real ownership. Courts could use it for evidence. Intelligence agencies could use it for compartmentalised files. Publishers could use it for actual limited editions. Companies could use it for internal secrets. Individuals could use it for personal property.

So the answer is simple:

It makes digital information capable of becoming property.

That changes information security, commerce, law, publishing, records, evidence, identity, and the structure of the web itself.

Try stop it @elonmusk .

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

Call me a fraud if you wish.

Call me a liar.

Call me delusional.

Call me whatever makes you feel comfortable.

The interesting thing is that none of those words matter once the code exists.

For years, many people have focused on stopping me, discrediting me, attacking me, censoring me, misrepresenting me, and preventing anything I was working on from ever seeing the light of day.

At one stage that may have worked.

At one stage much of this existed only in my head, in notebooks, in designs, in unfinished code, in prototypes, in ideas that had not yet become reality.

Ideas can be delayed.

Ideas can be suppressed.

Ideas can be ridiculed.

What becomes much harder to stop is a working system.

This month the code goes public.

Not a promise.

Not a roadmap.

Not a marketing presentation.

Code.

Working systems.

Architectures.

Protocols.

Implementations.

People will be free to inspect it, analyse it, criticise it, improve it, fork it, extend it, or ignore it.

That choice will belong to them.

The thing that many people seem unable to understand is that I am not asking anyone for money.

I am not selling access.

I am not selling licences.

I am not selling permission.

I am not creating a gatekeeper.

I am releasing it.

Free.

The irony is that this is the part many people will find hardest to believe.

Not the cryptography.

Not the distributed threshold systems.

Not the digital possession model.

Not the ability to create truly scarce digital goods.

The hardest thing for many people to understand is that after spending years building it, I am simply giving it away.

And that is why it is already too late to stop.

A secret can be suppressed.

An unpublished idea can be buried.

A prototype can be hidden.

A public implementation cannot be uninvented.

Once the code exists in the open, it belongs to history.

From that point onward, the question is no longer whether it can be stopped.

The question becomes what the world chooses to build with it.

[Nikolai Binner @BinnerNikolai]

We got GOYTA 6 before GTA 6
#gta6 #goyta #comedy

[Kim Dotcom @KimDotcom]

He actually said that

[-NИЖKY~ @s0dafire]

@verkehrt3 @KapnoManti @Kranzschwinger KI kann es besser zimmern.

[Ozymandias𓆏 @0zmnds]

Franz von Klenze

[General 🇳🇬iblat @iblato]

@Megatron_ron Promised virus to the people of promised land

[Kourosh Kabir (PK) @KouroshKabir069]

@Megatron_ron The virus was promised them 2600 years ago. I hope the virus is ok. Virus lives matter

[Voice of Rabbis @voiceofrabbis]

Zionists claim that criticizing Israel or opposing Zionism is antisemitic.

Meanwhile, tens of thousands of Orthodox Jews gather in New York to declare that Zionism violates the Jewish faith and does not represent Judaism.

[LEO @dieketzer]

Heute Abend kommt der Podcast mit hkn.mp3.

Unsere Kennenlerngeschichte, die Demo, der ganze Wahnsinn drumherum und natürlich noch vieles mehr.

Wird etwas ruhiger als in diesem Video ;)

[Viva La Stool @VivaLaStool]

“Being married to your true partner and having a good marriage is a superpower in life. Where it’s like you feel like every problem can be beaten because there’s two of you… If I have a problem she has a problem, if she has a problem I have a problem and we tackle it together. Knowing someone who always has your back is a superpower” -@BarstoolBigCat

[Kim Dotcom @KimDotcom]

WOW

[DerMedienfuzzi @MedienfuzziShow]

Zwei schwule Männer in Nashville lösen landesweite Empörung aus, nachdem sie ein Video von sich aufgenommen haben, in dem sie das Baby, das sie durch Leihmutterschaft bekommen haben, verspotten, während es nach seiner Mutter weint – alles für Content.

Mann: „Wen möchtest du, Dada oder Pop?“

Baby: „Mama“

Mann: „Nein, es gibt keine Mama.“

Baby: weint

Quelle @Rightanglenews

[Brother Nathanael @RealBroNat]

How to deal with jews
* Ban from finance
* Ban from media
* Ban from civil office
* Ban from education
Emperor Justinian, Alexander II, Hitler DID it!

[Kim Dotcom @KimDotcom]

I will provide a bounty of $20 million to anyone who brings Netanyahu to the International Criminal Court.