@TeamTrump I say this from a genuine place of curiosity. what could he possible mean by “end inflation” 😭 inflation is evidence of the economy growing it’s not inherently bad
@DramaAlert jack is valid in the sense that’s it’s very difficult to compete on youtube these days. mr beast has perfected it and grown to such a level that it’s become nearly impossible to challenge. whereas before anyone could pick it up, mr beast has set the bar too high
@ericajbohn @OyindaOdewale agreed. it also would’ve been nice to see all of the conversations that are just alluded to. it’s stated that claire helps he work through his family trauma, and even helps him finish the menu, but it’s all tell and no show. would’ve helped cement her character
@ericajbohn @OyindaOdewale that’s what I mean. that’s why it happens. you even agree saying it’s just not possible. that’s why i’m confused when you said that it “wasn’t needed” when it perfectly shows the problem you’ve faced to an audience that hasnt
@layahhhhh_@KevinMc48950733@OyindaOdewale that’s the whole point. we’re aware of that now because of claire. there would be no conflict. carmy is already an amazing chef. his character arc follows him learn how to communicate and be a person
@ThatweirdoKimm this show is VERY good at writing female leads and handles syd and tina with a lot of care. id be surprised if they don’t give claire the same treatment
@ThatweirdoKimm I almost feel like that’s the point. it’s very symbolic in context with the show, showing how carmy, even when he’s offered “perfection” messes it up. how they handle claire from here is what will make her character. carmy has to earn her back and she needs to stand alone
@BrandonMunsen@OyindaOdewale I think it will pay off. him and syd do not work together at all imo. it’ll depend on how they handle claire from here and whether or not they make carmy truly earn her back which seems to be the direction they’re going for. it’ll also give claire the opportunity to shine alone
@lurkin4learnin @0xAlaric@reetheaded agreed. this take fails to understand that the “intellectual” concepts in the movies are just vehicles to tell a more emotionally complex story. ironically this take falls into its own trap and isn’t any better than the viewers it insults.