@iArpitSpeaks Oo bhai, Don’t defame Sharma surname 😂, It bloody hurts bro, i don’t know why they forgot to convert your family, Please get your khatna done!!
Main Khalistani target List included:
Sikh civilians
Sikhs who opposed militancy. Village sarpanches, religious leaders, and members of mainstream Sikh political parties. Families accused of being "informers." Sikh police officers and their relatives. Moderate Sikhs who rejected the demand for Khalistan.
Hindu civilians
Militants carried out attacks on buses, trains, markets, and public places in which Hindu passengers were often singled out or deliberately targeted to create communal polarization and prompt migration from Punjab.
Punjab Police and security forces
Police personnel were frequent targets of assassinations. Families of police officers were also threatened or attacked in some cases.
Government officials and public servants
Civil servants, judges,Lawyers, Politicians, and journalists who opposed militancy or supported the government.
Political opponents
Members and workers of parties such as the Akali Dal (particularly moderates), Congress, and others were targeted at different times, depending on local circumstances and factional rivalries.
A Question the Government Must Answer Before Releasing a Film That Reopens Punjab’s Deepest Wounds
History is not just history in Punjab. It is memory. It is trauma. It is grief that still lives within families across generations.
When a film revisits one of the darkest chapters of Punjab’s past, the question is not whether it has the right to tell that story. The question is whether the State has adequately considered the consequences if that story is received in a way that inflames old divisions rather than encourages reflection.
If tensions rise after the film’s release, who will bear the responsibility?
Will the government simply issue appeals for peace after emotions have already been inflamed? Will the police be expected to restore order after distrust has spread across towns and villages? Will innocent citizens once again become collateral damage in a conflict they neither created nor wanted?
These are not hypothetical questions to be dismissed lightly. Punjab has lived through an era in which mistrust, extremism, political failures, and violence devastated countless Sikh and Hindu families alike. That painful history is precisely why any portrayal of those years demands extraordinary care.
Freedom of expression is a constitutional value. But every right exists alongside responsibility. Governments routinely assess security implications before major events, processions, or public gatherings. Why should a film dealing with one of the most sensitive periods in Punjab’s history be treated differently?
Has there been a comprehensive assessment of its potential impact? Have law enforcement agencies prepared for possible attempts by fringe groups to exploit public emotions? Has the administration developed a strategy to prevent misinformation, inflammatory propaganda, or communal provocation if they emerge?
If the answer is yes, the public deserves reassurance.
If the answer is no, then the government is taking an unnecessary gamble with social harmony.
The objective should never be to suppress history. Democracies do not erase difficult chapters. They confront them honestly. But they also recognise that historical storytelling can shape present-day emotions. The State’s duty is not to decide what people think—it is to ensure that disagreements never descend into intimidation, hatred, or violence.
Punjab spent decades rebuilding trust after one of the most painful periods in its modern history. That trust should never be taken for granted.
If unrest were ever to follow the release of a deeply polarising film, it would not be enough to ask who lit the first spark. The more important question would be whether those responsible for maintaining public order had anticipated the risk and acted wisely to reduce it.
History should educate a new generation—not leave it more divided than the one that came before.
Jai Hind 🇮🇳
@bachhal95@bahlawat11 bro, you also seems intelligent guy. how did it started? How people got started getting murdered in Punjab? And what could be done to stop it peacefully??
@bahlawat11 Bro, Post the reasons and solutions of this problem, How this problem started, rather then igniting more fire. If you really want to help someone.
@bahlawat11 How many of us knows, How Political Parties played an role in that. What were the things behind all these incidents, What caused it, Did we ever tried to know what is the root cause, who is behind it. What is the Solution.
@bahlawat11 No Offence, How many sikhs do you know? Do you think all sikhs are happy to kill Hindus or Hindus are happy to kill Sikhs. What as Hindus we did for Sikhs?
@AdityaRajKaul I respect it, and i firmly believe that innocent people died in both sides, that was totally wrong. And i am not an Local to Punjab, so i can just make comments on what i see and read, but Local people who witnessed it, They know how hard it was back then.
@AdityaRajKaul No Offence, maybe it happened or maybe not. But the truth is that, Innocent people lost life from both side, Hindu and Sikh, We can’t deny the fact that, Sikhs were killed in Delhi, Hindus were Killed in Punjab 100%. But Question is that, Who benefited from it?
@MumbaichaDon No offence, She is working hard, She is not begging from anyone. She never gives anti- india speech, And what you will call to those living abroad and supporting india in cricket matches if india is playing in Australia, Uk, SA??