Meanwhile, the GC students are unable to cross the cutoff, so their selection becomes zero. All the seats end up going to SC/ST students. In this situation, what will happen to the representation of the general category? Is there any constitutional provision for this?
Think of a situation...In the IITs, whatever seats are reserved for SC/ST students will of course be filled by them. Now, for the remaining seats, imagine that the highest-merit SC/ST students (those who studied well and scored 100 percentile) secure all the leftover seats.
#WATCH | Patna, Bihar | Jan Suraaj MLA Prashant Kishor says, "As long as people like Samrat Choudhary remain Chief Minister in Bihar, any discussion about a crime-free society is meaningless. When the person at the very helm of power has a criminal mindset, how can crime in Bihar be stopped?...
He also says, "At least one person each from 10,000 families in the Bankipur constituency will certainly get private sector jobs based on their qualifications. The opposition need not worry about this... It will happen within my current three-year tenure. I have made the announcement, and I won't be coming back to ask for votes if it doesn't happen."
यह संसद नहीं, इस देश का दुर्भाग्य खड़ा है। पूरा सत्र बिना प्रश्न काल के, पक्ष की मूर्खता और विपक्ष की अकड़ की बलि चढ़ गया। सत्ता पक्ष निर्लज्ज हो कर अंतिम दिन लोकसभा सत्र की अंत्येष्टि में ‘वन्दे मातरम्’ का चार स्टैंजा गा कर देश को ठग रहा है कि वो देशभक्त हैं।
@narendramodi जी, आप केवल पार्टीभक्त हैं।
If past benefit within a family cannot justify restricting a child’s rights today, then ancient historical wrongs also cannot justify permanently shrinking the general category’s rights today.
Good question sir...
So going by ur own argument...y should someone from a reserved category lose their constitutional opportunity just because someone in their family already benefited from reservation years ago?
Now apply the exact same logic the other way:
One Family, One Reservation sounds revolutionary until you ask one simple question:
Why should a child lose a constitutional opportunity simply because someone in their family benefited from reservation years ago?
If the concern is genuinely grassroots representation,show the data and design better targeting.
But turning reservation into a family blame game isn't social justice.
Equal opportunity isn't achieved by arbitrarily shrinking someone else's rights.
Why should a general category candidate lose their constitutional right to equality just because someone from another community was denied water or access 5,000 years ago?
aur mushlim, pakistan, rahul gandhi krte rehna...log chappal se maarenge..kyu ki juta pehen sake eaisa aapne koi kaam toh kiya nhi hai bihar ke logo k liye...jo vo paisa kma kar juta khareed sake...toh chappal se he maarenge ussi simariya ke Rajender pul pr rok ke...
Giriraj Singh ji,
Aap Union Textiles Minister hain , Begusarai ke MP bhi ho 2019 se continuously iss se pehle Rural Development, Animal Husbandry nd MSME bhi sambhalte the.... abhi Central cabinet mein 2-3 terms ka experience bhi ho gya hai to mujhe aap ye batao ki...
lekin abhi Aap minister + MP ho....aap apni report batao.....Agar koi kaam kiye ho bihar aur begusarai k liye aur data hai toh batao...warna 2029 me....janta aapki ye utsukta ko saant kr degi jo aapko rahul gadhi k sath kon log hai janne ki hai.....fir khate rehna Jhatka mutton
But A Sanskrit verse from an Upanishad that speaks of the attitude required for learning is immediately framed as communal contamination of “secular” space.....
First of all, the basic factual error.....it was not the Gayatri Mantra.... It was " Shikshavalli ", the opening section of the " Taittiriya Upanishad " a classical Vedic text focused on the discipline of learning, pronunciation, nd the proper approach to knowledge.
My cook plays the Gayatri Mantra every day when he enters my kitchen, and I listen to it every day and like it.
But my question is: Why was the Gayatri Mantra played at an IIT convocation? It wasn’t a religious event. Our educational spaces should be free from religious slogans and chants of all religions
but no one in Congress or progressive circles demands their removal on the grounds that they carry Christian ecclesiastical origins...nd those symbols are treated as neutral, universal, “modern.”