Seth W.

[Brent Beshore @BrentBeshore]

"The interviewer, @DouthatNYT, broke down crying during the conversation. And when he did, Sasse laughed. Not unkindly, but the way a man laughs when the heaviness and the lightness of something are both true at the same time and he’s decided not to pretend otherwise."

[Gad Saad @GadSaad]

We will tax you so that you are financially destitute. But in our infinite generosity, we'll drop a few dollars in your bank account to help you with your groceries. The collective crimes that are being committed on Canadians by their government is astounding. Future historians will marvel at how complacent the populace was.

[Marc Nixon @MarcNixon24]

Pierre Poilievre just dropped the TRUTH about Canada

We should be the RICHEST country on Earth.

Largest freshwater supply
Most land per capita
3rd largest oil reserves
3rd largest uranium deposits

And yet…

For the FIRST TIME in history…

We can’t even produce enough ELECTRICITY to power our own grid.

Let me get this straight…

We’re sitting on GLOBAL WEALTH
And living in a country in DECLINE?

This didn’t happen by accident.

They BLOCKED energy
They KILLED projects
They TAXED production into the ground

[Seth W. @s_weening97081]

@patriarchysons I disagree with the formation of the letter. I also disagree with the premise of the question as to whether their concerns are wrong or right. In my view, their concern is not sufficiently founded for the action they’ve taken. Like I said, the letter does not express my concerns.

[Seth W. @s_weening97081]

@zoeschimke Hi Zoe, if you DM I will be able to provide you a fuller answer than I can in a simple response here.

[Seth W. @s_weening97081]

@patriarchysons The letter does not express my concerns and, had I been presented with the opportunity to sign it, I would have declined.

[Seth W. @s_weening97081]

@yikesmom @patriarchysons I don’t doubt that at all. But it would be interesting to see and note how widespread the desires expressed in the letter are. It’s easy to state: “We students…” and present something as more widespread than it actually is.

[Seth W. @s_weening97081]

@patriarchysons For clarification: i meant to say it was not shared with me.

[Seth W. @s_weening97081]

@patriarchysons For what it’s worth, as a current student, this letter, nor any information regarding its formation, was shared with me. I would be interested to see how many students were aware of this letter’s formation before its publication, and have actually signed it.

[J.R.R. Tolkien @JRRTolkien]

“The Birth of Christ is the eucatastrophe of Man’s history. The Resurrection is the eucatastrophe of the story of the Incarnation. This story begins and ends in joy.”

— J.R.R. Tolkien

#HappyEaster

[Seth W. @s_weening97081]

@PresbyParsnip @ZimaInFlorida Thank you. That’s all I was asking. I just wanted to see if someone would come out and say tha SAC was not a true church, and you did. Too bad you’re just a parody account but I’ll take what I can get.

[Seth W. @s_weening97081]

@PresbyParsnip @ZimaInFlorida What’s with the refusal to answer the simple question? What is there to manipulate? It’s frankly getting very tiring to not get a simple question answered.

[Seth W. @s_weening97081]

@ZimaInFlorida @PresbyParsnip And as someone with an axe to grind against SAC it’s hard to take some of your assertions seriously. Has the question of whether SAC is a valid Church as historically defined been dealt with with a yes or no answer?

[Seth W. @s_weening97081]

@ZimaInFlorida So then what’s your point? Suspicions don’t make a proof. They can create grounds for investigations. Investigations were done regarding the suspicions. Suspicions remain yet proof has not been provided.

[Seth W. @s_weening97081]

“A hundred rabbits don’t make a horse. A hundred suspicions don’t make a proof” - Crime and Punishment

[Seth W. @s_weening97081]

@ZimaInFlorida You’re right, suspicions can create that, but what they can’t create is proof. Are you saying no investigations were done in regard to the suspicions?

[Seth W. @s_weening97081]

@PresbyParsnip @SolarPlexu95467 But a forest is a forest because it bears the marks of a forest. I’m asking a rather simply question of whether or not SAC is a valid church i.e. bears the marks of a true church, as historically defined. A simple yes or no is all that is needed.

[Seth W. @s_weening97081]

@SolarPlexu95467 @PresbyParsnip I asked if the poster believed SAC is a valid church: a simple yes or no question. The poster deflected with his/her answer. “Would disqualify them” is not a direct answer. No, I’m nothing more than a person asking questions of those who make assertions and accusations.

[Seth W. @s_weening97081]

@PresbyParsnip Oh, silly me. I didn’t realize you knew my motivations better than I know them myself. Is there anything else you know about myself that I don’t?