@Justineetuk@GodstimeAtas I agree with alotbif what u saying,
1- The Historicity of a Document is something that can be tested using academic method
2-You did not answer my question on naturalist worldview
3-Yes some things in the Bible require faith, no body has ever denied this, why is this n issue?
@K103499@somebodys0n@korrathetaymi Mark, Math, Luke and John are a Historic account of the life, death, resuraction, assention and teachings of Jesus
The Injeel is the message that Jesus preached as recorded in these books
This thing of Injeel is a book was a error in understanding by Mohammed,
@Justineetuk@GodstimeAtas Let me ask you, do u object to the virgin birth as a singular s.even recorded in the Bible or everything s.natural you reject?
If everything s.nature, then is it only in the Bible or universally u do not accept the occurance of Supernatural events?
@ArifShakeer@Ihunanya_chi@korrathetaymi Mohammed claimed Jesus was given a book called the Injil/Gospel, he made this up, based on a misunderstanding of what Injil means
Good news does not mean Book,
So not its not a fair question, for an ignorant person maybe, but we expect better of others
@K103499@korrathetaymi Muslims cannot separate reality n Quran 'c inventions, some of the things E.g The book given to Jesus
Don't exist in reality or History, it's made up by Mohammed with providing any proof
Now u asking us to provide evidence of Mohammed imaginations?
@K103499@somebodys0n@korrathetaymi Jesus never carried around a book (accept maybe the Torah) Quran made up this book n we asked to find the imaginary book of Mohammed
You Muslims search for it n find, we cannot be chasing Mohammed' imaginary book
@K103499@somebodys0n@korrathetaymi This is what I find with Muslims, they implicitly force their world view into others
The assumption that The Gospel is a book comes from the Quran, it's not a Christian believe
N we now asked to explain where the book Jesus was carrying went?
@Justineetuk@GodstimeAtas What separates it?, like I said the statement is disguisin Naturalist world view behind single S.natural event
There r alot of assumptions, Biases, n improbable religious believes behind naturalist worldview
But is followers pretend to be anti believe
@Justineetuk@GodstimeAtas I agree every claim should be tested, as for mocked that's a personal choice
Ur objection is hiding behind virgin birth while it's actually a questioning n mocking Supernatural occurance vs Purley naturalist world
@Justineetuk@GodstimeAtas Im acually in agreement with u for the most part, the post was not clear to say We live in a purely naturalist world n everything needs to have a naturalistic explanation
Anything that cannot be explained naturalisticly is to be mocked at,
If you're worried about violent passages in the Quran, the Bible also has verses about wiping out entire cities, with no one spared, including women, children, or animals.
Same pattern, different text.
Why is it that context is always missing when itโs the Quran, but suddenly important when itโs the Bible?
While I wouldn't call people dumb for staying in Islam especially with the real threats associated with leaving the religion
But in this age of the Internet anyone who decides to convert especially Women, I have to question thier faculties
@__richnigga@GodstimeAtas Yea maybe it's about her, who know
Please share more information about her if u have, someone might be interested in finding out more about her
@__richnigga@GodstimeAtas Read my comment n respond to it
Say maybe the over 300 specific n detailed prophecies are about this lady
Try phrase your comment like that n then read it back to yourself
@Justineetuk@GodstimeAtas Well I get what you saying but the post was not about the Trustworthiness of the Book, that's a different question all together
The post seeks to redicule the Virgin birth n us who believe it as foolish, but if u put all the facts down then the virgin birth sounds plausible