@Vinnman0 Show me one academic or research paper which places telugu/dravidian languages under sanskrit. I will go through it. Until then i rest my case. Dravidian languages are born independently of sanskrit.
@Vinnman0 There is no category called abrahamic or non abrahamic. Probably you mean semitic family.
See the language trees below. Both are same/similar. Experts couldn't place dravidian languages under sanskrit.
@KingRajiv@ysjagan తెలిసి తెలిసి కూడా ఆ కుటుంబం లో వుండాలి అనుకుంటే. నీది మామూలు గుండె కాదు బ్రదర్. ఆ గుండె వచ్చే election వరకు బతకాలి.
ఇట్లు -
తండ్రి
బాబాయ్
అమ్మ
చెల్లి
బావ
@AmritHallan@sankrant It's very common practice for barbarians to usurp cultured kingdoms.
Gothic tribes defeated roman empire
Mongols tribes defeated chinese empire
Arabs defeated persian s
Arabs and turks defeated indians
Several central asian tribes defeated empires near to them.. i can go on..
@Vinnman0 I am not inventing something new here. It's already there and being taught in academia. Sanskrit and Telugu are 2 different families. It has nothing to do with Aryan Dravidian nonsense. Sanskrit born in Northwest part of India probably today's gujarat. Telugu somewhere in south.
@Vinnman0 The languages are entirely and nothing having single mother. Today we have almost 20-30% urdu/farsi words like jameendar, munasab, patta (passbook) and still its make urdu a sibling.
Words=can be borrowed
Chandass=mostly for literature
Root words and word forms= tell origins