One use case we built SAFUPool for is community protection at the foundation level.
A foundation seeds a dedicated pool with their own funds, and as community members stake alongside it the pool grows without the foundation needing to top it up. The staked assets get deployed into liquid staking where the yield flows back as protocol revenue, so the coverage capacity scales on its own capital base.
The contract, the yield mechanics, and the payout logic are all live on Ethereum mainnet today.
If this fits what you are building for your community, we would like to hear from you.
https://t.co/t5zhStf5si
We built SAFUPool so that any team looking to deploy a protection pool for their community can verify every claim we make before committing to anything.
The contract is live on Ethereum mainnet, source verified on Etherscan, and the full codebase is open on GitHub. We ran 75 Forge tests across every payout path, symbolically verified 12 properties with Halmos (zero counterexamples), and passed a security audit with zero critical, high, or medium findings.
The payout logic is readable, the verification results are public, and anyone can audit the gap between our documentation and the deployed code.
If you're exploring community protection for your protocol, talk to us.
https://t.co/t5zhStf5si
Every protocol with enough active users will have at least one community member get phished this year. When it happens, the available responses are limited: tweet an apology, pin a warning post, and wait for the support channel to quiet down.
SAFUPool gives protocols a different structure: a community-funded protection pool your users stake into, where the payout calculation lives in the contract and runs automatically when a qualifying drain event is verified.
The protocol does not fund the pool directly and does not have to organize a vote to respond when someone gets drained. A staked community member who gets drained files no application and waits for no committee.
The contract runs the math, and the payout queues. Your community gets a protection layer with no discretionary fund required from you, and no promise you have to make after the fact.
@RiceFarmerNFT well that was a loss at mass. the pool with SAFU can cover as much as 23% of the losses before going broke. insurance companies fail at 10%
Last year, only 2.3% of people who had crypto stolen through wallet hacks recovered any of it. The remaining 97.7% got a sympathetic tweet, a forum post suggesting they file a police report, and nothing else, which is the expected outcome when there is no community funding structure behind you.
SAFUPool is a community-funded pool with a deterministic payout engine: if you are staked and your wallet gets drained by a qualifying attack, the contract runs the fraud score, calculates your entitlement, and queues the payout. Nobody votes on it, the committee does not need to decide whether your case is sympathetic enough, and no governance proposal is required before the math runs.
Community protection at scale only works when the payout mechanism does not depend on human generosity.
SAFUPool is live on Ethereum mainnet and the first wallet already staked.
We reserved OG status for the first 50 stakers, recorded permanently on-chain as an OGStaker event the moment the transaction confirms. Once 50 wallets have staked, the window closes and there is no way to earn it after that.
Stake anywhere from 0.01 to 0.75 ETH, get covered up to 15x if your wallet gets drained, and withdraw anytime with no lock.
49 spots left.
https://t.co/t5zhStf5si
@0GxPanDa stake a $ and cover upto $15 in your hot wallet. if your wallet is drained you can claim the lost funds by submitted the claim with a genuine hack txid. more details on https://t.co/wNmErUIywC
SAFU covers what Nexus Mutual refused to: phishing attacks, approval exploits, and private key compromise.
Nexus Mutual classified that category as 'high moral hazard' and excluded it from their policies. If your wallet gets drained through any of those three vectors, the largest DeFi insurance protocol looks at your claim and declines it by design.
We built SAFUPool specifically for that refused category, because it is how most people actually lose crypto and nobody was willing to cover it.
Protocol hacks, bridge exploits, and rugs are out of scope. We are upfront about that. The coverage gap we are filling is the human-layer one.