🚨Anthropic just showed a 24-minute workshop on how to actually do prompts for Claude.
Taught by the people who built it.
Free. No registration. No paywall.
I've seen $300 courses that don't cover what they teach in the first 8 minutes.
Watch it and bookmark it now.
A man spends 50 years teaching at MIT.
He knows his time is running out.
So he records one last lecture — everything he knows, distilled into a single hour.
He died 5 months later.
This is that lecture.
The most important hour you'll watch this week. 👇
Bookmark it for later
Anthropic engineers just showed how they build a full app from scratch, using a loop of agents
40 minutes from the team behind Claude Code
they used three agents: one to plan, one to build, one to judge, cycling until the app actually works
the winners won't have the smartest model, they'll have the best loop
watch it, then read the full guide on how to actually use loops below
INSTEAD OF WATCHING NETFLIX TONIGHT.
Spend 1 hour with this.
Claude AI FULL COURSE that teaches you how to BUILD and AUTOMATE anything.
The people who watch this tonight will wake up tomorrow with a new skill.
Watch it and Bookmark it now.
One of the most important legal consequences of the order is preservation. If a transaction proceeds before a dispute is heard, courts may later struggle to provide effective remedies. That concern now sits at the heart of the Diageo proceedings.
Hon. Lady Justice J.W.W. Mongare has effectively ensured that no irreversible corporate steps are taken before the court has an opportunity to hear all sides. That is precisely the purpose of conservatory relief.
The legal effect of the order is straightforward: until the court says otherwise, Diageo's controlling interest in EABL cannot be transferred, implemented, or given effect through regulatory processes.
Courts rarely issue conservatory orders lightly. The fact that interim relief was granted means the court considered it necessary to preserve the status quo while the issues raised against Diageo and other respondents are fully examined.
Another blow for Diageo
According to the ruling The High Court has dismissed an application to halt the proposed acquisition of EABL shares by Asahi from Diageo
Diageo loses
Diageo's proposed deal with Asahi now finds itself at the intersection of constitutional law, competition law, corporate governance, and judicial oversight—making this one of the most consequential corporate disputes currently before Kenyan courts.
Hon. Lady Justice J.W.W. Mongare's ruling demonstrates one of the judiciary's most powerful tools: preserving a disputed transaction before irreversible steps are taken. For now, Diageo's proposed EABL share transfer remains frozen.
Recap:
Diageo's proposed transfer of its controlling interest in EABL has encountered a significant legal hurdle after the High Court issued conservatory orders preserving the status quo pending further proceedings. In legal terms, the transaction is now under judicial watch.
Ruling issued on June 18, 2026, by Hon. Lady Justice J.W.W. Mongare at the Machakos High Court throws a massive wrench into Diageo's plans, marking a blow to them with recent court ruling disruptions.
#Diageo
The document closes with a stern Penal Notice, explicitly warning Diageo, its directors, and the regulators that any disobedience or failure to observe this freeze will result in criminal/penal consequences (such as contempt of court charges).
A new constitutional petition has introduced fresh legal questions into one of the most closely watched corporate transactions involving EABL and Diageo.
The court has ordered that the ownership, control, and shareholding status quo of EABL must be strictly preserved. Diageo cannot move its shares, and regulators cannot approve the merger while this order stands.
Diageo loses