@liamherbst_ If 2017 had half the influencer momentum as 2020-now had and we redefined all those projects as blue chips, there would have been surprisingly more pain. What people don’t see is redefining blue chip just makes you feel more comfortable about your bags.
How do people listen to influencers/founders who haven’t been doxxed? The more anonymity someone influential in this space has, the higher risk to everyone else they are as records prove. Why isn’t the doxxing meta here yet
@piovincenzo_ But this is under the belief that nothing can or will be better than BTC and the rest of the market will fight to survive with itself independent from btc. Those still building innovative tech will lead their industries in the next bull run and won’t disappear
@piovincenzo_ I believe more “companies” will survive this market than in 2017 because the completion and innovation is drastically different this time
@piovincenzo_ This is why everything failed then except for btc but now I think we’re in a different realm of innovation and competition where btc stays dominate because nothing can do what it does while the rest of the market innovates everything else in the world with blockchain tech
@SkyeKiing In a 1 year old industry “always” might be a stretch but you’re not wrong. Same concept with “blue chip” in nfts. We can’t redefine words to fit our narrative in a brand new industry
@IncomeSharks@ColdBloodShill Unemployment projected to rise for an unknown amount of time. We can safely rise but one small catalyst will crumble the progress
@piovincenzo_ This is why people need to see that 2017 was a currency market that BTC continued to show that more innovation cant beat perfection. 2020-now is a smart contract/technology market. The market is fighting alternatives to eth and in 2017 it fought BTC