How many more people have to die? How many more terrorist attacks have to take place? How much more evidence do we need that Iran seeks nuclear weapons and the ability to threaten not only our allies, but ultimately the United States itself?
Today, their missiles can reach parts of Europe. Tomorrow, they want the capability to reach America. So I ask: what happens then?
What kind of world will we be living in if a regime that sponsors terrorism acquires nuclear weapons? It won't just threaten us militarily. It will seek to blackmail us economically, politically, and strategically. It will use that power to intimidate its neighbors, pressure the West, and reshape the global balance of power.
The question isn't whether the threat exists. The question is: how much longer are we willing to ignore it?
Watch the entire episode:
YouTube: https://t.co/X9rqwjLI1P
Rumble: https://t.co/8FP5lvIjpv
How long am I supposed to wait? How many more people have to die? How many more terrorist attacks have to take place? How much more evidence do I need before recognizing a growing threat for what it is?
If a regime openly seeks nuclear weapons, develops longer-range missiles, sponsors terrorism, and repeatedly threatens America and its allies, at what point do I stop pretending the danger isn't real?
I keep hearing that we should wait, negotiate longer, and hope for the best. But what happens if we're wrong? What happens if one day they possess the capability to threaten the United States directly?
These are the questions I ask myself. Not because I want conflict, but because I understand the consequences of ignoring a threat until it's too late.
Watch the entire episode:
YouTube: https://t.co/X9rqwjLI1P
Rumble: https://t.co/9MfflFD5Ty
شاهزاده رضا پهلوی: آنچه شاهدیم، نشانه قدرت جمهوری اسلامی نیست، بلکه نشانه ناتوانی جهان آزاد از درک ماهیت واقعی تهدیدی است که با آن روبهرو است.
نشست امنیتی د��یای سیاه
اوکراین، ۹ خرداد ۲۵۸۵/۱۴۰۵
Does anyone seriously believe the Iranian Nazi terror regime will adhere to any deal over time? And if you do, based on what? They exist to conquer, devour, and destroy. And believe this is commanded by Allah. By any means.
If it is perceived in the region that a deal with Iran allows the regime to survive and become more powerful over time, we will have poured gasoline on the conflicts in Lebanon and Iraq.
A deal that is perceived to allow Iran to survive and possess the ability to control the Strait in the future will put Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Shia militias in Iraq on steroids.
I’m exhausted by this Iran whiplash. We put the Iranian people through hell with maximum pressure and sanctions, watched their currency and living standards collapse, and were told it was the only way to get a “better” deal than Obama’s. We even encouraged them to go out in the streets and risk their lives, telling them help was on the way. Now after all that we’re suddenly “ok” with a 20 year suspension of the nuclear program if Tehran makes a “real” commitment. That is not regime change. That is not zero enrichment forever. That is a tougher, longer version of the same time limited arms control logic we said was unacceptable. As a Trump supporter, I’ll say it clearly this is disgraceful and people deserve honesty about what we paid and what we actually got. @potus@marklevinshow