I DON’T UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE DON’T USE CHATGPT FOR JOB SEARCHES.
I got 5 interview calls in 7 days, all with ChatGPT as my recruiter.
Here are 6 prompts that turn your job hunt into a strategy.
[Save this thread]
Day 4 of #IPSASAccrualWorkshop: IFMIS Re-engineering & SCOA
Strengthening accrual reporting through SCOA, addressing IFMIS alignment gaps, leveraging reports for disclosures, and setting Year Two stabilization priorities.
Session Speaker: CPA Maringa Muchiri, @KeTreasury.
^CA
@ICPAK_Kenya@KPMGEastAfrica@PSASBKe@KeTreasury Leasing could also be wasteful and in as much as entities get to use assets without upfront payment, a plan to scale down and own should be encouraged. Case of County Governments, where a plan to have ownership of County offices in the long term should be encouraged.
"Leasing is treated as a financing mechanism because it allows entities to use assets without upfront cash outlays, helping manage budgetary constraints and cash flows."
FCPA Stephen Obock
Partner, @KPMGEastAfrica.
@PSASBKe@KeTreasury#IPSASAccrualWorkshop ^CA
🚨 BREAKING FROM SUPREME COURT 🚨
A doctor went on study leave.
The leave expired.
No extension was approved.
Silence followed.
Then the salary stopped.
No dismissal letter.
No termination notice.
No dramatic disciplinary hearing.
Just an empty bank account.
And the Supreme Court said:
“That was lawful.”
This is the story of Dr. Magare Gikenyi v. County Government of Nakuru & 4 Others [2026] KESC 12.
And it just redefined what job security really means for public officers in Kenya.
A public officer proceeded on paid study leave.
Like many do.
The approved period ended.
The studies were delayed.
But here’s the problem:
❌ No formal request for extension
❌ No regularization of absence
❌ No approval to stay away from duty
Yet the officer stayed away.
Then one day…
👉 The salary vanished.
So he went to court asking a powerful question:
“Can my employer stop my salary without firing me?”
The Supreme Court answered clearly.
And firmly.
Here’s what the Court decided (and why it matters):
✅ Salary stoppage is not termination
✅ An employee who absents themselves without approval cannot demand pay
✅ Public employers may stop salary under existing regulations
✅ Article 47 does not protect silence, neglect, or procedural disregard
Then the Court went further:
❌ Not every administrative action needs a formal hearing
❌ Due process is not a one-way street
❌ Employees must activate their rights by complying with policy.
The Court was blunt:
Public funds are not a sympathy fund.
Let that sink in.
What this means for YOU:
If you’re a PUBLIC OFFICER:
→ Study leave has timelines
→ Extensions must be requested and approved
→ Absence without authority has consequences
→ Salary is tied to duty, not entitlement
If you’re a PUBLIC EMPLOYER:
→ Salary stoppage is a lawful administrative tool
→ Termination is not the only form of discipline
→ Clear policy + clear breach = lawful action
→ The Constitution protects order, not indiscipline
For years, many public servants believed:
“As long as I’m not fired, my salary is guaranteed.”
The Supreme Court has now corrected that belief.
Rights come with responsibility.
Silence is not compliance.
And pay does not flow where duty is abandoned.
👉 Have you ever seen a salary stopped without a dismissal?
👉 Is this judgment fair—or too harsh?
Shared by Dr Vincent Munderu on REAL KMPDC
This happens when the news anchor has nothing but contempt for the guy he is interviewing. I don't blame @KoinangeJeff...I could have done the same and probably give him kick him on the backside!...our politics has become the playground for clowns/dimwits