Christianity strongly emphasizes that because no one is perfect, everyone needs grace. If this act was a mistake born of misguided passion rather than malice, it is addressed through the following
"Forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors" (Matthew 6:12) (cont)
@Suzierizzo1 this President sleeps 4-5 hours a day and handles more things than you can even fathom from your little cookie baking vagina slime complex
@Suzierizzo1 Mar-A-Lago should become a shrine and a testament to what a bunch of assholes you were in making up a ton of false s*** about a six decade icon of American capitalist success.
@Suzierizzo1 they said the same thing about honey bees, the spotted owl, River minnows and more so what industry would you like us to shut down now and f*** the economy further due to this stupid s***
@Suzierizzo1 Dems also told everyone Trump wouldnt have hospital ships there in time and he had them early and he had the javits center turned into an army field hospital. FL then turns to monoclonal antibodies which worked great but the Biden admin nationalized the supply and sat on it
@Suzierizzo1 Covid under Trump was due to Democrats. New York City health officials were on record as telling people to ignore Trump and that it was okay to take the subway to go see the Chinese New Year festivities because Trump was just a fear mongering xenophobe.
@Suzierizzo1 says e woman with 50+ mysteriously dead friends and a husband whose sexual assault she appears to have covered for. As for the following... I LOVE this! 😅
https://t.co/VXhmM5u4AB
@FmrRepMTG pt17 and buy weapons systems and software. While critics validly argue that this binds the two nations' defense industries much closer together, characterizing it as a literal merger of the armed forces is a misinterpretation of the bill. THE END
@FmrRepMTG You're ignorant:
The image you shared shows a post on X (formerly Twitter) regarding Section 224 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2027.
The social media post claims that the U.S. and Israeli militaries are "set to merge in 2027." (continued)
@FmrRepMTG pt15 The U.S. military will not be under Israeli command, nor will American troops be combined into a singular force with the IDF. Section 224 is entirely about industrial and technological collaboration—deepening the ties between how the two nations develop, test, (continued)
@FmrRepMTG pt14 Oversight: They maintain that the provision actually increases transparency by requiring regular briefings and progress reports to Congress.
Verdict: Are the Militaries Merging?
No. The claim that the U.S. and Israeli militaries are "merging" is false. (continued)
@FmrRepMTG pt13 Combat-Tested Tech: Supporters emphasize that the U.S. military benefits heavily from Israel’s advanced, real-world tested capabilities in areas like drone defense and cybersecurity. (continued)
@FmrRepMTG pt12 Efficiency: Proponents say it doesn’t create new programs or add extra funding; it simply cuts through red tape by putting one Pentagon official in charge of streamlining existing joint projects. (continued)
@FmrRepMTG pt11 Arguments For Section 224 (The Supporters)
Supporters, including House Armed Services Committee leadership and groups like AIPAC, argue that the provision is practical and beneficial to American security. Their points include: (continued)
@FmrRepMTG pt10 Sovereignty & Tech Risks: Some express concern over sharing highly sensitive U.S. military data and tech, or becoming overly reliant on foreign-sourced military tech. (continued)
@FmrRepMTG pt9 Human Rights Concerns: Opponents point to civilian casualties in Gaza, arguing that the U.S. should be distancing its military infrastructure from Israel rather than fusing technology R&D. (continued)
@FmrRepMTG pt8 Deepened Entrenchment: Critics argue that integrating Israeli-origin tech into U.S. military programs creates a permanent bond that shields the relationship from future congressional scrutiny or changes in foreign policy. (continued)
@FmrRepMTG pt7 The debate splits into two main viewpoints:
Arguments Against Section 224 (The Critics)
Critics and human rights groups argue that the provision goes too far by embedding Israeli defense systems directly into the U.S. military framework. Their concerns include: (cont)
@FmrRepMTG pt6 Why is it Controversial? (The Debate)
The House Armed Services Committee recently debated an amendment brought forward by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) to strip Section 224 from the bill. The amendment failed in a voice vote, leading to the headline seen in your screenshot. (cont)
@FmrRepMTG pt5 The integration focuses on emerging defense technologies, including:
Counter-drone systems
Missile and air defense (like the Iron Dome)
Artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous systems
Cybersecurity and electronic warfare
Quantum computing
(continued)