Sanatan_97

AI SWE, Intel | IIT Patna, MTech (AI) | BIT Mesra, BE (ECE)

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

The intellect class should start focusing on Scam State of India instead of meme States of India.

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

@keshavbedi @Ashneer_Grover Idiot u

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

Will get to know in Dhurandhar 3 why UPI was taxed

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

@Akshat_World What about INTC?

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

@chiragraman Did any of the scores moved in AC reviewer phase ?

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

@chiragraman I have added a specific note as AC confidential comment stating the same.

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

@chiragraman And the best part is, except structural changes moving tables here and there central claim was not shaken with new experiments also, and here im with a 3,3,3 score

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

@chiragraman Yes, what about this, what if this all kinds of questions. I answered all. One was like we should do this, to which I replied I have already stated it as a natural expansion/future scope. Everything can't be fitted into one paper.

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

@chiragraman Saying too many new results is not an excuse, man you only asked it. If I ignore them it's a problem if I address them then it's a problem.

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

@chiragraman If the reviewers are rigid with scores even after addressing all concerns with papers central claim standing tall. ACs should ask this question and take wise decision.

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

@langer_han One reviewer gave me 2 saying not novel and cited 2 papers, I went through them putting out the crux of both and what we have with us, every doubt addressed then he raised the score to 3. Man if your doubts are resolved then what's the issue? ACs should intervene and ask.

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

@langer_han Best part is i answered all the questions raised( the central claim of the paper stood tall even with new results ). Then they are like too many new changes, man you only asked for it right? ACs should take note of this.

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

@langer_han Everything under the sun can't be put in a single paper that you as a reviewer should understand. I want my best scores so I'll answer all.

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

@yoshitomo_cs I faced the same situation, I did all they asked and then they were like "too many new results". When the paper's central claim stood tall.

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

@NeurIPSConf There's no point of rebuttal discussion with these reviewers who don't understand what they want or should ask for.

[Sanatan_97 @sanatan97]

@marcinpaprzycki @VarunChandrase3 Then why to sign up as a reviewer altogether. They should have enjoyed their summer.