Question: how does someone afford to build a house like this? Especially a single income household on an annual salary of 7.8 lacs? If it’s enough as collateral for a 1 crore rupee student loan, then this question needs to be asked.
Well-done team @Pamphlet_in
You are being targeted by the ecosystem for exposing the elite lifestyle of their cockroach, Saurav Das.
They are behind you means they are really afraid of you.
Keep it up.
No one’s broken into your house, @Pamphlet_in is simply reporting from outside, which is fully within their rights.
Instead of manufacturing outrage on X, care to explain how a “student” somehow managed to afford ₹12 lakh rent for a South Delhi house?
This clown wanted lakhs of people to march towards Parliament freely and the freedom to enter even the PM’s house, but peed seeing a few people around his house....
Typical coward Naxalite...
US is opposing FCRA billl
Opposition is opposing FCRA bill
Even Pakistan is also opposing FCRA bill.
It means,
GOI is doing absolutely right for the country
✌️🇮🇳⚔️
One more girl who was seen shouting abusive slogans at the Jantar Mantar protest is now apologising.
Slowly, every girl is realising the mistake they have made.
However, the most interesting part is that all of them have claimed they were forced or asked by the protest organisers to shout abusive slogans.
The government and the @DelhiPolice should investigate the protest organisers and identify the people who allegedly pressured these women to abuse Modi, Modi's mother, and Meloni.
Mahua, just four months ago, you sent 13 policemen from Krishnanagar to arrest & intimidate me for quoting a tweet about you. Instructed them to create a nuisance in my neighbourhood to sully my image.
You slapped 12 non-bailable FIRs on me, which were quashed by the High Court
#WATCH | Delhi Police Mahasangh holds a press conference | Former ACP KP Kukreti says, "There are responsible leaders sitting on the floor of Parliament. They have never been police officers, nor have they undergone any police training, and they are not legal experts. I do not know on what basis they make such assertions, claiming that a statement was issued and implying that, since the general public does not have deep knowledge of the law, the Union Home Minister personally issues orders and that everything happened because of his directive. What exactly are pellet guns? A bogey has been created around pellet guns. The general public does not know what pellet guns are...A highly misleading statement has reached the public, suggesting that the Union Home Minister is directly responsible in this manner. This is absolutely wrong...Regarding the students, let me make it clear, we also have children. We have a fully democratic system. They have constitutional rights and fundamental rights. Protests do take place, and why should they not? We have witnessed countless protests.However, crowd control is a different matter. Crowd control can be managed easily. But when a mob becomes violent, charged, and forms an unlawful assembly, every single member becomes responsible...When a mob frenzy takes over, with people using projectiles, sticks, and stones, breaking barricades, and ignoring warnings issued under Section 163 declaring the assembly unlawful, what options does the police have?...Firing could have become inevitable; the law itself provides for such action in extreme circumstances. When a police officer’s life is under direct threat, they are authorised to take whatever action is necessary on the spot. Neither the Governor, the Chief Minister, nor the Home Minister is present at such a location. The senior officer on the ground has to decide how to protect their own life, the public, public property, the Parliament building, and the Parliamentarians themselves. What greater act of anarchy could there be than people storming Parliament?..."
This reads like a post straight out of Shrieking Jane’s playbook, amateurish, intemperate, and completely divorced from responsibility.
Instead of threatening institutions and public officials who are simply discharging their duty, perhaps spare a thought for the students whose safety and future are actually at stake.
It is the responsibility of every educational institution to alert students to potential risks. A protest that began in the name of students has, in many places, been overtaken by political interests and infiltrated by anti-social elements indulging in violence and vandalism. Advising students to stay safe, comply with the law, and be wary of misinformation is not intimidation, it is responsible administration.
If you truly care about students, stop using them as instruments for political mobilisation. Their education, safety, and future should come before partisan agendas.