Please follow the account and click the link to fill the form.
This is for female football fans who reside in Ilorin.
We can't wait to have you!
We follow back too!
Her Game is official! 🎉
A space for women who love football—whether you watch casually or yell at the TV 😂
We’re kicking off with our first ever UCL Final Watch Party 🎊
📍 Ilorin | 📆 May 31 | 🕐 6pm (no African time 😏)
Limited slots! Tap in 👉 https://t.co/MBpWEDfNWI
The contradictions in the way some people discuss football history are astonishing.
Take Pelé, for example. Everyone proudly says he won three World Cups, and rightly so. Yet no one brings up the fact that he missed the 1962 World Cup final through injury. Nobody tries to take that title away from him because the logic is simple: he was part of Brazil’s triumph, so the trophy belongs to him.
But when it comes to Messi, the rules suddenly change. Some claim Barcelona’s 2006 Champions League doesn’t count because he missed the final. The issue isn’t Pelé or Messi—it’s changing the criteria depending on the player.
The same applies to Maradona. He is one of the greatest players ever and led Argentina to World Cup glory, becoming a national hero. But he never won the Champions League or the Copa América, while Messi won the Copa América twice, won the Finalissima, the World Cup, and maintained an elite level for over two decades. That doesn’t diminish Maradona—it simply shows how complete Messi’s career has become.
Cristiano Ronaldo’s case is another contradiction. For years, the World Cup was the ultimate argument used against Messi. The moment Messi won it, many suddenly reduced it to “just seven games.” If the World Cup was the biggest measure before 2022, why did it stop being one after Messi lifted the trophy?
Then comes the excuse that Portugal has “no World Cup history.” But history isn’t inherited—it is created. Spain had never won a World Cup until the generation of Xavi and Iniesta changed that. Argentina’s greatest football legacy was built by players like Kempes and Maradona. The greatest players don’t wait for history—they write it.
Messi didn’t become the greatest because he won the World Cup. By 2022, he already had multiple Ballon d’Ors, four Champions League titles, countless individual records, and was the all-time top scorer and assist provider for both Barcelona and Argentina. The World Cup wasn’t what made his legacy—it was simply the final missing piece.
Pelé has achievements Cristiano doesn’t. Cristiano has achievements Pelé doesn’t.
Messi is the only one who combines the strongest arguments from both sides.
That’s why diminishing Messi’s career has become so difficult. Every criticism seems to require changing the rules, moving the goalposts, or creating new standards that only apply to him.
That’s not a weakness in Messi’s legacy.
It’s a weakness in the argument against it. 🐐❤️🇦🇷
The english agenda against Messi is so funny because they are just joining on the anti Messi bandwagon to cover their failures. England were beaten fair and square and had 12% ball possession in the last 30 minutes of that game. They let Messi have the ball and shit all over them and now they have been crying for 7 days
The brain of a person who thinks the English language defines literacy.
People also forget that the same way auto-translate works for other languages is the same way it does for English.
See as she televise her idiocy cos of banter.