Sandys63

Momma of 4 Gma of 10
Arizona patriot fighting for Freedom & the Constitution
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@emaq27 @mcg61551 @MJK10797588 The video is 1000% true!

The pic of cops being processed is true!

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@FIMartija @SenseNotNoise @acnewsitics One party winning 21 states is impossible!

Registering 2.7 million voters then all voting democrat is impossible!

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@surfskatehate @JD1776_1791 @JudicialFox She was arrested, I dont know how much time if any she got but definitely arrested!
Its from 2020

[Fascinated Redheaded Creative @RedFreedom_Glow]

Due to the small amount of time we have, many will not have time to watch your three hour video.

I wish we could get people to have more than a 30-second attention span, but probably will not happen in a few days.

Summarized your advice here.

Should probably be summarized even further.
In the meantime, I will post it in relevant areas.
Message me if it needs correction:

How to *EFFECTIVELY* Challenge Election Results and Get A Forensic Audit:

Key rules of engagement (IMPORTANT):
- “Standing” is the important factor.
- Indicators (weird charts, vote totals, trends) are not evidence.
- Language kills cases.
- We must instruct candidates and lawmakers correctly and fast.
- We have DAYS. Follow the rules or guarantee failure.

What Candidates (and Those Instructing Them) SHOULD Do:

Get standing first and correctly. CANDIDATES on the ballot have the clearest path.

Under Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections, a candidate has Article III standing to challenge the rules governing the counting of votes in their election.

They are not mere bystanders; they have a personal stake in a fair process, accurate results, and the political legitimacy that flows from public confidence that the outcome reflects the people’s will. They do not need to show a substantial risk of losing, a specific vote drop, or extra spending.

File within the short statutory window after the canvas/certification (example: Arizona 5-day window under ARS 16-672A).

Once you concede, it is generally over.
Move FAST.

Claim only that the election was not administered correctly, the process raises questions about fairness/accuracy/legitimacy, or “I just want to understand how the results were determined and whether the will of the people was reflected.” This is the legal threshold used successfully (Kelly Ward / Arizona 2020 example).

Combine candidate standing with specific voters who suffered concrete personal procedural injury (treated differently from the public): forced to use a Sharpie instead of their pen; ballot rejected/kicked back by the scanner; told to drop the ballot in a bag instead of scanning it; denied ability to vote under the normal process. These create additional standing.

Demand a true forensic audit: the right to physically inspect, touch, analyze, and verify every ballot and every part of the process (physical + digital), with proper observers and chain of custody. Explicitly reject limited “inspect the ballots” rights that are fulfilled by showing one random box you cannot touch.

Require examination of the actual paper ballots against the rules that apply to them (mail-in ballots must be color, on specified paper, folded along a predetermined line from an official printer). Compare original ballots to pre-image, post-image, final cast-vote-record images, and the election management system to show any changes, who benefited, and material effect. Demand full chain-of-custody documentation and reject unsupervised transfers.

Instruct the candidate to control funding and management of the challenge and any audit. Do not hand control to the same circles that previously funded lawsuits and audits that never presented the full evidence.

Instruct lawmakers and candidates with precise language and the actual legal standard. We are the ones who must get this information to them quickly and correctly.

What Candidates (and Supporters) SHOULD NOT Do:

DO NOT SAY or include in any filing or public amplification: “FRAUD,” “RIGGED,” “CHEATING,” “ALGORITHM,” “DOMINION,” “THE MACHINES,” “POSSIBLE MANIPULATION,” “STOLEN,” or similar. These are proclamations of a crime.
Only the governor, secretary of state, or attorney general can make a fraud proclamation in advance; otherwise it requires courtroom adjudication. Including these words is how nearly EVERY 2020–2022 case was smothered and dismissed. Let me say that again: that single word category tanks the case.

Do not treat viral charts, “every race is 53-46,” more early votes than total votes, color-shift maps, or similar as evidence. They are ONLY indicators. Courts treat them as inadmissible trends. Straight-ticket voting or other ordinary explanations defeat them on summary judgment.

Do not rely on generalized public grievances (“as a concerned citizen I believe the process was flawed”). Ordinary voters lack standing under Article III “generalized grievance” doctrine. Only candidates (or voters with specific personal injury) clear the threshold.

Do not accept the state’s normal “audits” as sufficient: looking at 25 or 250 ballots and extrapolating; adding machine ticker tapes; matching poll-book check-ins to ballot counts; running paper through a sheet counter; or totaling party numbers from receipts. None of these examine the actual individual ballots or votes.

Do not amplify or forward social-media claims that use the forbidden language or overstated facts. Doing so poisons the candidates and the pleadings. You become the reason the case is tossed.

Do not let the same attorneys, funders, or “election integrity” groups that previously controlled lawsuits and audits (and kept evidence out or caused dismissals) control the new effort. Control and transparent agreements matter more than having the proof if the people managing it choose not to use it.

Do not focus on machine rules (VVSG guidelines are voluntary) as the primary claim. Focus on the paper ballots and the mandatory rules that govern them.

See full video for your own research here:

https://t.co/zaFFgak3kk
or here:
https://t.co/HUp2j9Z10D

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@madeleine61980 @Sassafrass_84 Why are you claiming he threw us under the bus?

Tuesdays midterns were definitely not on the up n up.

Give Trump admin the 45-60 they deserve to do what they have to do!

Something is coming.

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@GeorgeN2344 @Sassafrass_84 21 States did that in one day!
Nov 3rd 2026 the great steal!

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@a_zstorm @TJKibbles @TheSCIF Agree

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@thisthetime2025 @TheSCIF @EFFE4USA 45-60 days the Scotus ruled 11/2/26 to inspect every single ballot, exit tapes, etc etc.

I think Trump is extremely calm for a reason!

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@JackieUSA86 @Kat34736 @TheSCIF @DOJFraudDiv @FBIDirectorKash @SecMullinDHS If Arizona took care of it Hobbs wouldnt have won!

She wouldnt give interviews, she wouldnt debate Kari Lake or Andy Biggs

I guess voters were suppose to guess her policies and thoughts?

Yea, no she didnt win sh!t!!

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@CraigCastleber1 @TJKibbles @TheSCIF We'll see 🤦‍♀️

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@mountain_vt @thiago_den2356 @4TrumpDogs @TheSCIF @jenrenee Why were they thrown out???

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@YouKnoImHim I watched him for a few minutes last night.

He literally spewed left wing bullshit and believes the midterms were legit and Maga is dead!

Same MSM talking points!

Bye bye Tim Pool

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@MichelleRM68 2/2
My honest opinion is it was 1 more strategy to eliminate humans food source.

From 2022 to 2024 in the US farms, chicken, egg, goat farms burned to the ground, not just a few but it felt like every other day a farm burned down.
1 night 10,000 head of cattle died of heat! Hmm

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@MichelleRM68 There were up to 450 ostriches killed in 1 afternoon.

The owners fought the Canadian government for 4 years, owners finally lost the battle on this fateful day.
People traveled from all over to park their cars/trucks to block anyone from going onto the property.
1/2

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@justjp5 @TheSCIF I questioned the poll workers in 2018, 2020 and 2022 when we were forced to put our ballots in an open plastic tray ( Box 3)!

Box 3 ended up at runbeck print company.

7+ days later all democrat swept AZ!!
2026 the results were in really quick.

Makes 0 sense!

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@FelonousFeline @TheSCIF Yes it was!!

They literally told on eachother by over playing their hand..

I cant wait til we see what the Trump admin has waiting for the riggers!

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@DoryBeutel @TheSCIF Calm down

Wait 45-60 days, If nothing is done by then we can panic!

I'll be honest, I have never heard or seen Trump except a loss so calmly.

He has tools, he has 45-60 days to investigate every single ballot.

He has something up his sleeve 😍

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@hoosierpoppy @DeepLeaksHQ @DNIGabbard You're not wrong!

I believe Hillary Clinton is the single most dangerous, corrupt and Evil politician we have ever witnessed!

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@BruceLLP @Tablesalt13 The color revolution is their Agenda!

Every Country in the west are or have already completed it except Poland and USA!

I find it odd that in 2020 & 2022 the liberal, labour or democrat party won their elections, opened their borders to 3rd world illegals!

Kawinkidink?

[Sandys63 @sartin_sandra]

@CraigCastleber1 @TJKibbles @TheSCIF Just wait....