Study Circle dedicated to a generative exploration of Savarkar's and Ambedkar's thought. Towards bold new visions of the Indian future.
Led by @priyankchn
The Study Circle will be based in JNU but run in a hybrid mode, so irrespective of your location, you can join us, learn with us, and contribute to the discussions.
If you find our vision meaningful and are open to new ideas, fill out the membership form:
https://t.co/fOtIvjp0fO
Our civilization does not move forward except through contradiction. What's wrong in this?
The deep emotional unity of the motherland is not a 'policy' but a matter of faith. It doesn't break down but is renewed in overcoming difference 🪷
India's movement away from caste is literally written into the Constitution. The only civilization-wide leap of practical ethics baked into politics, law, and evolving custom.
A cultural revolution (a successful one at that).
Because it is so difficult, I personally have worked on a more grounded 'intuition' approach to these two figures. This approach zooms in on the idea at the cost of the person, speaks to the future rather than past, goes to philsophy over mere history.
https://t.co/drMGonF153
When the Savarkar-Ambedkar Circle was founded, it was an eccentric conversation to start. But 3 years later, its core thesis has been proven correct:
Republic's Gandhi-Nehru era is truly over. What comes now is based on different, radical intuitions: of Savarkar and Ambedkar.
He was an inspiration for what I tried to do with Savarkar and Ambedkar here (with @haryannvi bhai as the serene host). Obviously much more pampering needs to (and will) happen.
https://t.co/l4p1iYb4iO
Forget Sindhu? A Hindu without Sindhu? That is like a word without meaning, a body without life - Impossible. Impossible. Impossible!
As long as even one Hindu remains alive, forgetting Sindhu is impossible.
~ Savarkar
If you support us then with you.
If you don't then without you.
If you oppose us then inspite of you.
~ Veer Savarkar
An abiding formula for forging unity that does not demean and destroy the self.
Things about Savarkar that made him rare in his time and even today:
1. Exaltation of Hindutva from religion to all-of-civilization.
2. Radical almost caustic streak of realism.
3. Allergy to other-worldliness.
4. No diffidence to any past golden age. Glory projected to future.
My article with @Abhina_Prakash on the caste census in @IndianExpress today.
We argue that this census addresses second-order ignorance - not knowing what we don't know - and makes a case for a nationalist imperative of a credible, disaggregated census.
https://t.co/OTqRhY2ING
I have a somewhat different reading of this episode in which Adi Shankara completely misses the point that Chandala made, and emerges an uncertain hero.
Might sound absurd so let me describe in some detail:
There's this idea (even Ambedkar notes this) that the Upanishads by propagating the ideals of aatman and brahman, already contained seeds of a deep spiritual egalitarian democracy within, but these seeds did not come to fruition.
if you, guided by God, destiny, and your own reason, have come to truly understand the problem
then you must also find the courage to look at the solution
Let's create an anti-kanging manifesto concluding in future-forming objectivity and not self-hatred. If you want to contribute to your caste/region entry, DM me.
सत्यं ब्रूयात् प्रियं ब्रूयात् , न ब्रूयात् सत्यम् अप्रियम्
(speak the truth, speak what is pleasant, do not speak truth that is unpleasant)
~ manu maharaj
सत्यं ब्रूयात् - शृण्वन्तु हर्षेण वा क्लेशेन वा
(speak the truth, let them hear it with joy or with pain)
~ ambedkar
This casteist reading framing SCs as passive sufferers could only come from an UC liberal.
SCs worked with the Hindu society, restored Hinduism to an egalitarian order, got these values enshrined in Indian constitution, made H nationalism socially progressive & they're passive?