JG

"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell, 1984

[🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 @mrddmia]

Obama is the biggest fraud and most destructive force in America.

He is a Marxist.

He is subversive.

He hates America.

He has been destroying us from within.

For decades.

Racial division and chaos.

Weaponizing law enforcement and intel agencies against political enemies.

[savage daughter @DonnaPrissyrn1]

@BarackObama GFY

[Fr. James Altman @FatherAltman]

Pachamama Leo is not Catholic. He is a fraud. And he is evil.

The REAL Catholic Church condemns socialism, "democratic" socialism, progressivism and communism.

The REAL Catholic Church unequivocally condemns those who supported and promoted the butchering of babies in the womb. (i.e., the Democratic Party in the United States)

The REAL Catholic Church unequivocally condemns politicians who support Godless and damned socialist policies, devoid of reference to Jesus, the Transcendent Messiah.

That's just getting started on Pachamama Leo.

Leo is a fraud.

Figure it out yet?

[Brittany Rae @legitbrittFLA]

The Popes archived Tweets from his original account. #wokepope

[Michael Sebastian @HonorAndDaring]

This is obviously the play, and when you understand that 65% of revenue from Catholic Charities comes from the government, you will understand why the US bishops want the Democrats back in power.

[🇺🇸 Jake Hilton 🇮🇱 @TheDemSlayer]

Reminder: The Vatican deliberately chose Robert Prevost to be the Pope instead of Cardinal Sarah because they wanted an American Leftist who would…

(1) oppose President Trump and the American conservative movement…

(2) label Christian Zionism as a heresy and foment more hatred and distrust towards Israel…

and (3) to prepare the Catholics worldwide to embrace the ISLAMIC Beast and False Prophet when they arrive.

The Vatican rejected a black conservative for Pope because they needed a communist, Islam-loving liberal.

👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

Cardinal Sarah: “Wake up. Islam is a danger. If Christians don’t start caring about our faith, Islam will take over the West. They’ll impose their laws and culture.”

Pope Leo: “We should perhaps be a little less fearful of Islam.”

[Vince Langman @LangmanVince]

Barack Obama used the fake Steele dossier to undermine President Trump's first term. No, he's using a liberal Pope who hates President Trump to undermine the midterms. That's why Obama sent Axelrod to meet with Pope Leo XIV. It was a strategy session.

[Cynical Publius @CynicalPublius]

It is in the best interests of the Roman Catholic Church, the USA and the world that the Vatican publicly release details as to the subject matter of the recent meeting between Pope Leo XIV and Obama's political strategist, David Axelrod.

This incident is harming the Church in the USA far more than it is harming the USA itself.

Transparency may defuse the situation.

[Lila Rose @LilaGraceRose]

Horrific. 9-year-old Muslim girl shares how she was forced into marrying a 70-year-old man

Children CANNOT consent to marriage.

[Paul Weston @PWestoff]

DEI is dangerous. The surgeon below lost her job after the patient suffered permanent brain damage during the operation/dance routine. Britain now has 36% foreign doctors and 30% foreign nurses. They are hugely over-represented in negligence cases.

[Blue Lives Matter @bluelivesmtr]

In case you were wondering what BETRAYAL looks like from a "Republican" - here you go.

Thune was busted heading off to vacation with a TSA escort... knowing that Americans are waiting hours and hours to get through security and the SAVE America Act was not passed.

Toss that guy out of his leadership roll. What a disgrace. When did he become a Democrat?

REPOST and call him out!

#thinblueline #lawenforcment

[Schrodinger’s Oil Trades @SchrodingersAlt]

@officer_Lew Unqualified DEI hires literally kill people.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Hello Senator Thune,

At 3 AM on Friday, March 27th, in a near-empty chamber, you passed a bill by voice vote that excludes all funding for ICE and CBP.

Let me repeat that: voice vote. No roll call. No record of who was there. No accountability. Just you, Barrasso, and a handful of senators shuffling paper in the dead of night while America slept.

You could have demanded a recorded vote. You chose not to.

You could have held the line for five more days until the House returned. You chose not to.

You could have used the same procedural tools Democrats have used against you for 40 days. You chose not to.

Instead, you gave Chuck Schumer exactly what he asked for, DHS funding minus immigration enforcement, and called it a win. Then you walked to the cameras and blamed the Democrats.

Let's be precise about what you did:

1. You caved to a demand Democrats made on Day 1 of this shutdown. Forty-one days of supposed hardball negotiation, and you settled for their opening offer.
2. You handed them a template. The next time Democrats want to defund any agency — ICE, CBP, or anything else — they now know: just shut down DHS and wait. John Thune will fold at 3 AM.
3. You punted to reconciliation. "Good possibility," you said. Not "we will." Not "guaranteed." Just maybe. Meanwhile, ICE operates on fumes from last year's bill with no certainty of future funding.

The precedent you set:

You have argued for months that the filibuster is sacrosanct. That the 60-vote threshold protects minority rights. That we cannot bend Senate rules for policy wins.

But at 3 AM on Friday, you bent every norm that actually mattered:

• Voice vote to avoid accountability
• Empty chamber to avoid debate
• Midnight deal to avoid scrutiny
• Immediate recess to avoid questions

You'll bend the rules to avoid a fight. You just won't bend them to win one.

What you've actually accomplished:

Democrats demanded ICE restrictions. They got ICE defunded.

Not reformed. Not restrained. Defunded.

And you're out here tweeting about how Democrats are the "Defund the Police" party while you just voted to defund border enforcement at 3 in the morning.
The question you should answer:

Why did this deal have to happen at 3 AM?

Why couldn't it happen at 3 PM, with cameras rolling and every senator on record?

You know why. Because you didn't want your voters to see what surrender looks like.

Here's my message: We saw it anyway.

Stop hiding behind "Democrat obstruction." You're the Majority Leader. You set the schedule. You control the floor. You chose this outcome.

Own it.

[C3 @C_3C_3]

Replace 99% of Congress with this kid and America would be in fixed in no time.

Not even kidding a little.

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

Black girl brutally attacks a White girl at Hendersonville Middle School (@HCPSNC) in NC while everyone watches.

You probably didn't hear about this because it doesn't fit the narrative.

[Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ @shanaka86]

JUST IN: Meta sold 7 million Ray-Ban smart glasses in 2025 alone.

Workers in Kenya are watching the footage.

Not metadata. Not anonymized clips. The actual videos. People undressing. People in bathrooms. People having sex. Bank cards. Medical documents.

The blurring is supposed to protect privacy. It fails constantly. The contractors see everything.

Here is the part that should stop you cold: You did not buy the glasses. You did not agree to the terms of service. You did not consent to anything. But if someone wearing Meta glasses walks into your bedroom, your bathroom, your doctor's office, your home, a contractor on the other side of the world may be watching you right now.

The person wearing the glasses consented. Everyone else in the room did not.

Meta's defense is that this is all disclosed in the privacy policy. They are technically correct. Buried in language so dense that 99% of users never read it. And even if they did, it would not matter, because the terms govern the wearer's data. Not yours. You are not a party to the contract. You are the product being annotated.

Millions of AI-enabled cameras walking around in public. Recording constantly. Uploading to servers. Reviewed by humans earning a few dollars an hour to label your most intimate moments so the algorithm gets smarter.

This is not a bug. This is the business model.

The EU is already asking questions. MEPs submitted formal inquiries to the Commission this week demanding answers on GDPR compliance. The problem is obvious: European data protection law requires consent from data subjects. Bystanders are data subjects. Bystanders never consented. The entire architecture violates the regulation by design.

Meta's response has been silence and a reference to terms of service that do not apply to the people actually being filmed.

Google Glass died because people called the wearers "Glassholes" and banned them from bars. Meta solved the social problem by making the glasses look normal. They did not solve the privacy problem. They hid it.

Seven million units sold in 2025. The installed base is accelerating. Every unit is a potential surveillance node operated by someone who may not understand what they are feeding into the system and reviewed by contractors who see everything the algorithm cannot process.

The question is not whether this becomes a scandal. The question is whether the scandal arrives before or after the glasses are on 50 million faces.

Watch the EU. If Brussels moves on GDPR enforcement, Meta faces a choice: disable human review in Europe and cripple the AI training pipeline, or accept fines that could reach billions. Neither outcome is priced into the stock.

The glasses are selling faster than ever.

The contractors keep watching.

And somewhere right now, someone you have never met is looking at footage of you that you never knew existed.

[Aakash Gupta @aakashgupta]

Everyone’s missing the real story here.

Meta’s Ray-Ban glasses need human data annotators to train the AI. When you say “Hey Meta” and ask the glasses to analyze something, that video gets sent to Meta’s servers, then routed to Sama, a subcontractor in Nairobi, Kenya. Workers there manually label objects in your footage. They see everything you recorded, intentionally or not.

7 million pairs sold in 2025 alone. Every single pair generates training data that flows through human eyes in Kenya. Workers told Swedish journalists they see people undressing, using bathrooms, having sex, and accidentally filming bank card details. One worker said “we see everything, from living rooms to naked bodies.”

Meta’s automatic face anonymization is supposed to protect people in the footage. Workers say it fails in certain lighting. Faces that should be blurred are sometimes fully visible. The person you recorded without knowing? A stranger in Nairobi can identify them.

Buried in Meta’s terms of service is one sentence doing enormous legal work: the company reserves the right to conduct “manual (human) review” of your AI interactions. That’s the legal cover for routing intimate footage from Western homes to a $2/hour labor force operating under NDAs, office surveillance cameras, and a strict no-questions policy. Workers say if you raise concerns about what you’re seeing, you’re fired.

This is the same company, Sama, that TIME exposed in 2023 for paying Kenyan workers $2/hour to label graphic content for OpenAI while being billed at $12.50/hour per worker. Workers described the experience as torture. Sama ended that contract, then pivoted to labeling Meta’s glasses footage. Same workforce. Same rates.

Meta markets these glasses as “designed with your privacy in mind.” The privacy design is a tiny LED light on the frame that most people don’t notice. The data pipeline behind it routes your bedroom footage to a contractor with a documented history of worker exploitation, failed anonymization, and union-busting lawsuits.

And the next generation of these glasses? Meta is planning to add facial recognition. The same system that can’t reliably blur faces in training data wants to start identifying them on purpose.

The LED light on the frame is doing about as much for your privacy as the terms of service nobody reads.

[Vandell | Black Swan Capitalist @vandell33]

The official story around the U.S. and Israel attacking Iran is narrative management. At its core, this is about preserving the U.S. dollar system and creating cover for more money printing.

Iran operates outside IMF dependency, trades beyond the dollar, has no Rothschild central bank, is energy-rich, and is vital to China.

All wars are bankers’ wars.

[James Li @5149jamesli]

Israel knows this is their last chance. They’ve lost the American people, and Trump will be the last President who will kowtow to whatever Israel wants, unconditionally.

So be prepared for them to act brazenly and barbarically towards Iran and us, in ways never thought possible.

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

A disturbed Joe Rogan sharply exhales after his guest reveals the real origin story behind Planned Parenthood.

In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which became Planned Parenthood in 1942.

What this woman openly endorsed stopped Rogan cold.

According to author @Rach4Patriarchy, Planned Parenthood was really founded as a “eugenics program” disguised as reproductive rights.

Wilson says Sanger was “so evil” that writing a chapter about her in her book gave her “nightmares.”

Sanger believed “birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race” and that we should limit procreation from “the unfit.”

Curiously, Planned Parenthood started popping up heavily in Black communities.

And here’s the Sanger quote that was too dark for even Rogan to process:

“The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to k*ll it.”

She didn’t say that casually. She wrote that in a book!