the right attempts to structure their environment into something understandable and productive. they form classifications to differentiate and encapsulate concepts, they aknowledge hierarchies of ability, they develop societal roles to coordinate with their community, and they speculate on what their environment could be. each right society has tradeoffs in how the environment is conceptualized and how their societal roles manifest.
the left pursues entropy with a promise of utopia. without consideration for the value of each structure, they will inflame cracks within those structures, claiming a form of imperfection. the claims for each crack dont need any consistency, they only care that damage is done to the existing right structure. they only wish to rot that structure closer to collapse, forcing the right society to justify itself or die. their goal is a universal grey, a utopia with no reason or power.
after the left has destroyed the right's societal structures, they will drift rightward and form a more corrupt and shallow structure to live within. a "successful" left movement becomes a failed right society because entropy is never utopia
Domino's and KFC have announced that their food products will now become digital-only, following Sony's announcement that all their PlayStation products will be digital-only.
The important caveat is that these digital food products will only be available to customers with PS5 Pro+ or better Matrix pods that allow full simulation of the tastes and flavors.
The actual product will be a nutrient paste directly fed into your feeding system, delivered by the Matrix full-body experience service.
People who do not have access to PS5 Pro Matrix pods or are not active subscribers of the Sony-Matrix Virtual PlayStation Plus service will not be able to purchase these digital food products.
Other companies like McDonald's, Taco Bell, Starbucks, and Chipotle are in their planning phases to phase out their physical food products.
>Flock cameras: *exist*
>People want evidence that they're good.
>Evidence shows they're bad.
>People say they don't want them.
>City cancels contract, stops funding them.
>Cameras stay anyway, continue collecting data "just in case".
Why didn't Democracy work?
Shouldn't the voice of the people saying "NO!" do the trick?
"We the people" didn't want mass surveillance to begin with, so why would our complaints matter?
Did you want kill switches in your car? Who asked for the KIDS act? Digital ID? Central Bank Digital Currency?
Who among us asked for any of this?
Your opinion on the topic never mattered to begin with, and it still doesn't.
-----
Hypothetically, if you were to see someone destroying a Flock camera, no you didn't.
i prefer the political triangle but there is a distinction between lib left and the rest
auth right:
pro creation-anti competition
auth left:
anti creation-anti competition
lib right:
pro creation-pro competition
lib left:
anti creation-pro competition
lib left is a quandrant for suicidal ideologies that want to be suppressed, killed off, and replaced by other peoples
auth left suppresses their own people but attempts to preserve their own power against competing ideologies
I have just finished reading Justice Clarence Thomas's 91-page dissent in the Supreme Court’s ruling striking down Trump’s birthright citizenship order.
It's incredible.
Here's everything you need to know: 🧵
@AI_EmeraldApple >woke never had a goal
it does even if not spoken consciously– destruction of current creations and suppression of future creation. every reason, real and hallucinated, is a justification for these goals
Every single sign tells us if we just allowed more building, housing will become more affordable at no cost to the taxpayer. Yet politicians campaign on the need to limit supply, subsidize demand even more, & spend a million tax dollars per apartment in stupid ass public projects
I bring home a trapped coyote and let it loose in the kitchen.
Hackles up. Teeth bared. Pissing on the floor.
My wife says, "Get it out."
I tell her that is a very unwelcoming and unchristian way to speak about a future house pet.
The children back into the hallway.
I tell them it's a rescue.
I tell them fences are fear.
I tell them cages are barbaric.
I tell them the old rules were cruel.
I tell them it will domesticate in time.
Then I grab my lunchbox and leave them to live with my principles.
When I get home, there is blood on the floor, and the experts who sold me on compassion are already explaining why nobody could have seen this coming.
Anyway, that's Western migration policy.
there is some confusion here. the system has both capitalist and socialist elements. the police force is a socialist policy, but it is held in reverence because it serves the purpose of rule of law. there is a process by which this purpose can be shifted to more capitalist means, but until those alternative, private institutions are created and sustainable, the socialist police force can minimize damage, at least if they are run in good faith. the ideal is privatization, but the means to create rule of law is valued until that ideal is met.
@workswithseed@philthatremains if you actually think socialism is when the government does stuff, then the police force is socialism, and abolishing socialism is defunding the police
this is how you know your view is stupid