@Killing_theory@Josh_HokitUFC I’m not saying tons of muscle
I’m saying a bit more muscle
Not a fking body builder
Technique don’t mean as much in heavyweights, these are big dudes and all it takes is one shot
And have you seen his fights, he hits guys so many times and a lot of them eat it and keep coming
🗣️ Anyone else dealing with the crushing existential dread of living on a beautiful planet bursting with life and love - and instead of just getting to enjoy it, having to instead watch while the dumbest pedoccultist motherfuckers on the planet kill everything in their path on their quest to hoard the most amount of money possible?
…or nah.
Failed takedowns should count for the fighter defending them, not reward the fighter repeatedly failing to get them.
Hernandez vs. Rodrigues is the perfect example of what’s wrong with MMA judging.
Hernandez was outstruck 243-111 on the feet and went 3-for-29 on takedowns. Rodrigues defended 26 takedown attempts while getting the better of him on the feet, in the clinch, and throughout the grappling exchanges.
Yet somehow, two judges only scored it 48-47 Rodrigues (I had it 49-45 with Round 2 a 10-8).
At some point, repeatedly failing to impose your game plan has to matter. Stuffing 26 takedowns is effective grappling. It shouldn’t be treated like nothing while the guy going 3-for-29 gets rewarded for “pressure.”
Absolutely atrocious judging.