The Inspired Mind

Love Life, Prosperity & Freedom. I am conservative w/out a party.
Performance Exceeds Promise. NoDM.

[0HOUR1 @__0HOUR1_]

Great, we have Supreme Court justices using CHATGPT to write their arguments.

[The Inspired Mind @SavageAZ2]

@AshtonForbes slowly but surely we will learn about plasma
https://t.co/Zf3ciivotd

[Johnny St.Pete @JohnMcCloy]

🔥👀 WOW… NOW ITS ALL STARTING TO MAKE SENSE.

What if I told you that Amy Coney Barrett WORKED ON GEORGE BUSH’S 2000 LEGAL TEAM?

What if I told you that as a young attorney she assisted during the Florida 2000 recount on the Bush side?

What if I told you on the night of Justice Ginsburg’s death Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell called Trump to say “YOU HAVE TO NOMINATE BARRETT”?

What if I told you his #2 John Thune was a key supporter in getting her confirmed to SCOTUS & appeared to take a large lead with press?

Why was it so important for them to SQUEEZE her in 8 days before the election? It’s almost if they knew Trump wasn’t gonna win 2020.

What if I Told you she got a $2 MILLION dollar book deal in 2021? What if I told you her literary agents were Javelin?

What if I told you that Javelin was founded by former Bush speechwriter Matt Latimer & Keith Urbahn, who was DONALD RUMSFELD’S CHIEF OF STAFF?

What if I told you her dad was an attorney for SHELL OIL that specialized for 29 years in Gulf offshore drilling contracts?

Who else did offshore oil drilling in those years? Bush’s Zapata PIONEERED IT & Cheney’s Haliburton which provided support services to oil rigs.

Now… what if I told you that Justice Amy Coney Barrett did an event for her book at the George W. Bush Presidential Center EARLY LAST MONTH on May 4th?

What I told you not only was Bush in attendance but she ADMITS she met and spoke with him prior?

Now what if told you her same literary agents at Javelin are JAMES COMEY’S book agents as well?

So Thune who was selected and endorsed by Bush & Cheney personally with events & fundraisers … who used to duck hunt with Cheney often… and who has been holding up “The Save America Act” was pivotal in pushing Barrett’s confirmation.

He also happened to succeed Mitch McConnell as Senate Leader … and the number #2 for the vote was TEXAS JOHN CORNYN?

Does anyone still think all these Thune/Bush Cheney connections and obstacles to Trump regarding fulfilling the MAGA agenda we voted for are a coincidence?

Who is REALLY leading the GOP? Does The Boss have shadow elements working against him?

Watch til the end because it gets even more unbelievable as it goes on but it’s ALL TRUE.

[MJTruthUltra @MJTruthUltra]

Operation Paperclip discussed today:

The CIA recruited 1,600 Nazi scientists into the U.S. government after World War II to continue their research and experimentation with MK-Ultra mind control.

This was done KNOWINGLY, in direct violation of the Nuremberg Code, and constituted crimes against humanity.

Now we are getting somewhere…

https://t.co/L0DGTIpn0o

[The Inspired Mind @SavageAZ2]

@SecScottBessent 🤔🧐

[Chris @chriswithans]

If you're a U.S. citizen and you're living abroad, you have to file taxes on your income. Doesn't matter where it's from. And if you want exclusions or credits, you still have to file. (This is the #1 reason why departing Americans renounce their citizenship.)

The IRS should be mining foreign countries looking for "anchor babies" and other citizens who aren't filing. Instead of obsessing about whether your grandma reported her Etsy knitting earnings, they should be focused on this.

And then you can give them a choice: renounce your citizenship or pay back taxes on everything you owed, including penalties.

[MJTruthUltra @MJTruthUltra]

Book deals can be very lucrative…

Financial disclosure reports released Monday show that four Supreme Court justices combined earned over $2 million in book payments etc. in 2025. 

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson reported a $1.18 million advance from Penguin Random House for her memoir "Lovely One," which was published in 2024. She also received a $2,500 painting from Chicago artists Paul Branton and Kristen Williams. 

Justice Sonia Sotomayor reported $88,100 in royalties from Penguin for two children's books she published. She also received concert tickets worth $4,333 from the record company Rimas Entertainment, which is rapper Bad Bunny's record label. 

Justice Amy Coney Barrett reported $849,071 in book royalties from Javelin Group.

[The Inspired Mind @SavageAZ2]

@michelles2cool But . . .but . . . The @WNBA play has a high level of physicality for a non-contact sport, especially if a player,@CaitlinClark22, tries to outshine the mediocre old guards.

[Bo Loudon @BoLoudon]

The author of the 14th Amendment:

"This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens..."

The SCOTUS didn't just go against President Trump, they went against the Constitution.

[The Inspired Mind @SavageAZ2]

"Caitlin Clark did not enter the WNBA asking to be a symbol. She came to play basketball. She came to compete. She came to join a league filled with players she once admired.

Instead, she has been asked to endure a level of hostility that no professional organization should tolerate."

[Sports Patriot @SportsPatriotUS]

As a writer, it is becoming increasingly difficult to cover the WNBA with the distance the job requires.

That is not something I say lightly.

Any serious writer understands the responsibility of separating observation from emotion, evidence from outrage, and analysis from personal bias. But Cathy Engelbert and the WNBA are making that separation harder by the day.

The latest example is almost impossible to defend.

The commissioner released a statement that appeared far more concerned with protecting the image of Caitlin Clark’s attacker than addressing what happened to Caitlin Clark herself... a star player who was throat punched, kneed, and trampled in a sequence that had very nothing to do with basketball.

At some point, silence becomes its own statement.

At some point, selective outrage becomes evidence.

And at some point, the refusal to protect the league’s most important player stops looking like incompetence and starts looking intentional.

Caitlin Clark did not enter the WNBA asking to be a symbol. She came to play basketball. She came to compete. She came to join a league filled with players she once admired.

Instead, she has been asked to endure a level of hostility that no professional organization should tolerate.

The physical play is only part of the issue.

The larger failure is institutional.

The league has failed her. The Fever have failed her. Too many players have failed her. And now the commissioner has failed her publicly.

The next few days will be telling.

At a bare minimum, the Fever organization, its coaches, and its players should publicly support Caitlin Clark and make clear that what happened to her should never be normalized.

They do not need to attack anyone.

They do not need to escalate the controversy.

But they do need to stand beside their teammate.

Because if they do not, it becomes increasingly difficult to see a healthy path forward for Clark in a league where she is asked to absorb repeated physical punishment, public minimization, and institutional silence without visible support from the people closest to her professionally.

There is also a human element here that should not be ignored.

Clark is not just a basketball asset.

She is someone’s daughter.

Someone’s sister.

Someone’s friend.

And at some point, the people around her... family, representatives, sponsors, and trusted advisors... may need to ask whether any amount of money, fame, or professional opportunity is worth this level of physical and emotional strain.

Basketball is supposed to be demanding.

It is not supposed to be dehumanizing.

Clark has handled it with grace. That should be acknowledged.

But grace should not be required in the face of repeated mistreatment.

There comes a point when asking a young athlete to keep absorbing the blows... physical, public, and psychological... becomes indefensible.

For months, I dismissed calls for outside intervention as excessive.

I no longer feel that way.

If the WNBA cannot protect its own players fairly, then perhaps it is time for someone outside the league to ask why.

Fans, media members, former players, abuse survivors, and anyone who cares about basic fairness should speak up.

This is no longer just about basketball.

It is about workplace protection.

It is about institutional accountability.

It is about whether a professional league can allow one of its employees to be targeted, minimized, and publicly abandoned without consequence.

The WNBA does not need another statement.

It needs accountability.

And it needs it now.

[WindTalker @nmlinguaphile]

As a Native American I’m a little offended that the 14th Amendment didn’t grant us citizenship until Congress passed an exception for us. Meanwhile, a CCP spy can fly to Guam, drop a baby and fly home with the baby who qualifies to run for president 35 years later.

[MOMof DataRepublican @data_republican]

Isn't one of the arguments in favor of abortion that some women need to abort because they can't afford a baby and they would be a drain on the taxpayers. Yet, the left is perfectly happy to fund every illegal immigrant and all the birthright babies. Makes zero sense.

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

I have just finished reading Justice Clarence Thomas's 91-page dissent in the Supreme Court’s ruling striking down Trump’s birthright citizenship order.

It's incredible.

Here's everything you need to know: 🧵

[Fletch17 @RealFletch17]

This is BIGGER than
Anyone can imagine!
Check following post to
See what agencies are effected
This is a BOOOOOOOOM!

[Tim Pool @Timcast]

Tomorrow Barrett will publish her argument that a Chinese Communist party member who flies to Guam so he and his wife can deliver their baby, who then take their child to be raised in China, will be eligible to be President of the United states 35 years later

[Proud Elephant 🇺🇸🦅 @ProudElephant]

They both betrayed America today.

[Andrew Kolvet @AndrewKolvet]

Official transcript from the US Senate on May 30, 1866. Senator Jacob Howard, who introduced the 14th Amendment:

"This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens...”

SCOTUS got this ruling 100% wrong. A total travesty.

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

Charlie Kirk left a tweet for everything

[Senator Rand Paul @SenRandPaul]

Upset with the SCOTUS decision today?

Call your senator at [phone] and tell them to support my Constitutional Amendment to end Birthright Citizenship. We must protect the integrity of American citizenship.

[🇺🇸 Edward T. Winslow @EdwardTWinz]

CLARENCE THOMAS JUST PUBLISHED THE EXACT ARGUMENT FOR WHY THE SUPREME COURT'S BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP RULING IS CONSTITUTIONALLY WRONG

Not a political objection. Not a policy disagreement. NAMED HISTORY. SPECIFIC TEXT. Amendment by amendment.

📜 14th Amendment, 1868 — "ONE pervading purpose": securing equal citizenship for FREED SLAVES after the Civil War
📜 Reconstruction Congress intent — zero evidence the drafters contemplated children of foreign temporary visitors or illegal aliens
📜 "Subject to the jurisdiction" clause — Thomas: means full political allegiance, not mere physical presence on US soil
📜 The majority opinion — Thomas says it REPURPOSED the Amendment to protect preferred rights the drafters NEVER contemplated
📜 Thomas's direct quote — those rights "CANNOT find support in the text today"
📜 His warning on the ruling — "I am not sure that today's opinion will stand the test of time"
📜 Thomas during April 2026 oral arguments — probed whether immigration debates even existed when the 14th was written
📜 His core distinction — freed slaves were entitled to citizenship because they were Americans with no other homeland; children of foreign nationals are not in the same category
📜 Roberts and Barrett — joined the liberal bloc in the 6-3 majority in Trump v. Barbara
📜 Gorsuch — joined Thomas in dissent; Alito filed a separate dissent

💀 91 pages
💀 1 purpose the 14th Amendment actually had, per Thomas
💀 ZERO rights the Reconstruction Congress contemplated for children of foreign nationals
💀 100% of Thomas's argument grounded in the specific post-Civil War historical record — not modern policy preference

Every argument on this list is anchored in the text and history of the Amendment. Not in what the Court wishes it said. In what the people who wrote it actually intended.

The Court's ruling stands. But Thomas put a 91-page marker on the record.

Thomas's dissent is still ticking. These are the arguments at the core of it.

I'll keep you updated as this unfolds, turn on notifications this is EXTREMELY important.

[The Inspired Mind @SavageAZ2]

@elonmusk @HouseofElon @peterrhague @neuralink When?