Sawbones- 1/6

ICU nurse, former corpsman,

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@MoviesSpot33 @mirrorballboobs Except it's literally the same knife

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@mirrorballboobs It's the same knife from 2 different vantage points.

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@nypost A Famas and an M2 .50cal? Riiiiiiiight. Unless you can tell me the exact history of sale of those, and how they ended up in his hands, >'m gonna believe there's some fuckery afoot. MaDeuces don't just go on sale, and there's only a small number of Famas in the country

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@DrBenTapper1 Stop pushing lies and pseudoscience for clout.

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@mcclorey5875 @theliamnissan Are you dumb? You DO realize this is a parody account, right?

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@nickshirleyy @DrOzCMS @Sacredfire100 *Fraud and Sellout. Fixed it for ya

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@HydrogenGuide No, they don't

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@LynnLikesDND @cyberspook_ It's fake. He's not actually getting tattooed. It's just a social media post for likes and views

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@cyberspook_ It's fake

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@Jabz_CFC

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@om_patel5 Literally every 1st year resident would think this man has OSA

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@Matt_Pinner Morgan, Picard, America, Marvel, Kangaroo, Jack Sparrow, Underpants, Planet, Hook, Ahab, Nemo, and now some real ones: Jon Paul Jones, James Cook, Leif Ericksonn, Sir Francis Drake, Ferdinand Magellan, and if you know pirates, Ching Shih, Captain Kidd, Blackbeard, Black Bart

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@EnigmaDonny @TigheSammy So listening to those podcasts and go touch some grass. Your brain is rotting

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@amadaoffor Bouncing Betties have a half second fuse that is ignited when they are stepped on. It would have gone off. They also aren't made to be put under a floorboard

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@Sheldon056 And it looks like trash

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@GidiGambino And then it would blow up. And then frags don't blow up in giant fiery explosions that blow you off your feet like that. It's a boom and shrapnel. They don't blow up like a brick of C4 attached to an incendiary device

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@GidiGambino This is a stupid stupid scene. It's one thing to clear a room with a frag. It's another thing to then turn and watch the frag grenade blow up. You absolutely would never do that. It also only takes a few seconds for them to blow up, so you would pull the pin Chuck it,

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@Sage_medics Ok, so I knew it was the vocal cords right away, but What in the UnHoly F^CK is with this product placement??? What even is this? And i don't even play MTG

[Simon Maechling @simonmaechling]

Glyphosate isn’t controversial because it’s understudied.

It’s controversial because the evidence is ignored.

Fact 1. This chemical is exhaustively studied:
•40+ years of data.
•Thousands of studies.
•Reviewed repeatedly across continents.

Fact 2. Global regulators agree:
Every major regulatory authority that assesses real-world exposure reaches the same conclusion:
•US EPA
•EFSA
•ECHA
•Health Canada

👉 Not carcinogenic at human exposure levels.
👉 Not genotoxic.
👉 No unacceptable health risk when used as directed.

This is not one agency.
This is not a global conspiracy.

Fact 3: The largest human study says no.
•54,000+ pesticide applicators.
•Followed since 1993.
•No link to overall cancer.
•No consistent link to non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

If glyphosate caused cancer, this study should have found it.

It didn’t.

Fact 4: Food residues are not the issue.
•Residues are far below safety limits.
•Dietary exposure does not pose a cancer risk.
•Drinking water exposure is not a health hazard.

“Toxic” without dose is not toxicology.

Fact 5: Worker exposure is also low.
•Measured exposures are far below NOAELs.
•Regulators repeatedly conclude: not of concern.

So where does the scare come from?

One outlier → IARC

IARC did a hazard classification, not a risk assessment.

They put glyphosate in the same category as:
•Red meat.
•Hot beverages.
•Being a barber.

IARC explicitly ignores exposure.

Regulators do not.

This is the entire conflict:
Hazard-only classification
vs
Risk-based regulation.

Confuse the two - and fear wins.

Bottom line:
No pesticide regulator on Earth currently considers glyphosate a cancer risk at real-world exposure levels.

The science is boring.
It’s to put a stop to the misinformation.

[Sawbones- 1/6 @sawbones1_6]

@HHSGCMikeStuart A judge cited this very tweet.....