SB

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@pinkfriday988 @westerosies Probably wasn’t a single person, more than likely it was some sort of mob like the Shepherd’s

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@DavidMi62693109 @Apex_willye @SiezerW @Lairdphoenix27 Yeah do you?

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@DavidMi62693109 @Apex_willye @SiezerW @Lairdphoenix27 Gyldayn bases his conclusion on the testimony given by the fisherfolk... he did not live during the Dance. You're a casual lol

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@DavidMi62693109 @Apex_willye @SiezerW @Lairdphoenix27 Correlation?

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@DavidMi62693109 @Apex_willye @SiezerW @Lairdphoenix27 For the 30th time, this is based on the assumption that he couldn't have survived. Can you now provide the passage where the Maesters show us concrete evidence backing up their assumption?

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@DavidMi62693109 @Apex_willye @SiezerW @Lairdphoenix27 …

I’m talking about their testimony. You base your entire argument on it, yet it is false.

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@DavidMi62693109 @Apex_willye @SiezerW @Lairdphoenix27 ‘Nor did they’ yet Caraxes survived. He survived the fall and died to the wounds from the battle, making their testimony false.

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@DavidMi62693109 @Apex_willye @SiezerW @Lairdphoenix27 When did the author state that he died? He did not lol.

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@DavidMi62693109 @Apex_willye @SiezerW @Lairdphoenix27 Once again, based on nothing but the assumption that he couldn’t have survived. No proof.

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@DavidMi62693109 @Apex_willye @SiezerW @Lairdphoenix27 They assume he did. Once again, no proof.

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@DavidMi62693109 @Apex_willye @SiezerW @Lairdphoenix27 Thanks for proving my point. Their testimony contradicts itself right here. Caraxes survived the fall and he did not die to it, he died due to his wounds inflicted by Vhagar.

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@DavidMi62693109 @Apex_willye @SiezerW @Lairdphoenix27 It didn’t, the testimonial of the fishermen contradicted itself from the get go. There is 0.0 evidence that he actually died.

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@ThxGoldenKing @KINGDOMSDUNKK Good boy. Then stop crying in your Tweets.

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@ThxGoldenKing @KINGDOMSDUNKK He didn't do it because Aegon wasn't his heir. Your entire argument is trash. No need to debate it.

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@ThxGoldenKing Did you read what I said? That's the entire reason I said based on legality. Even apparent heirs can be usurped. King's decree also outweighs both male-primogeniture and custom (which male-primogeniture is). There's also 0 evidence to say the GC was reference for future cases.

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@ThxGoldenKing Newsflash, every single living Targaryen has legitimacy. Rhaenyra's claim, based on legality, is undisputed. That's the point.

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@morpheus_065 @amatusidem - Not law
- Aegon s not rightful monarch because his reign quite literally starts by usurping
- Don't have a strong claim
- Said king named Rhaenyra apparent heir

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@dz_ajacied ready om vrijdag naar huis gestuurd te worden? whahahahah

[SB @sbeeezy1]

@dz_ajacied nog een keertje dan