@martinagerup1@ThomasHeie Måske er der blevet sat lås på systemet, da de ikke forventer at nogen kan regne skatten ud rigtigt. Måske vores skattesystem skulle være simplere?
God bless technological progress and video archives!
Here's almost four minutes of Putin's evolving statements from 2008 to 2024:
2008: "Crimea is not disputed territory of Ukraine, and the issues of Russian speakers are internal issues of Ukraine."
2013: "Russia certainly doesn't plan to send troops into Ukraine."
2014: "After the annexation of Crimea, Russia doesn't plan to further divide Ukraine."
2019: "It's nonsense that Russia plans to attack anyone in future."
2022: "Russia's Special Military Operation does not involve the occupation of Ukrainian territories," and "Russia has acquired new territories during the Special Military Operation."
2023: "The conflict in Ukraine is not a territorial conflict—we have plenty of own territories."
2024: "Anyone who wants Russia to give up CONQUERED TERRITORIES in Ukraine must understand that this is impossible."
2024: "Could Russia attack Poland or Latvia? That's nonsense." Why do we need this?
2024 "Russia has no plans to attack NATO..."
How stupid do you have to be to not understand that negotiations and promises don't work with a lying and hypocritical dictator?
All he and Russia understand is strength and the ability to deliver a real rebuff to Russia's imperialist dreams!
@HansenWendelboe@thorborg@KimIversenShow Is that a problem? Don’t you have freedom of speech? I guess there is a lot of Americans that also are being critical. Isn’t that normal in a democracy?
Åbent brev: Nedsæt en privatlivskommission og stop hastebehandling af PET-loven.
PET-lovforslaget baner vejen for masseovervågning. 25 organisationer kræver en tænkepause og en privatlivskommission.
Læs brevet og ”skriv under” ved at retweete.
#dkpol
Go’morgen gode mennesker
Og til Justitsminister @PHummelgaard, der af uransaglige årsager vil hastebehandle regeringens vanvittige lov om masseovervågning af danskerne, så staten får sin mistanke-maskine og kan holde øje med om vi opfører os mistænkeligt….fx i vores sundhedsjournaler:
Stop det, Peter H.!
Den lov skal ikke hastebehandles. Den skal skrottes!!
Tak. Og med venlig hilsen
Rikke
🧵 THREAD: A federal whistleblower just dropped one of the most disturbing cybersecurity disclosures I’ve ever read.
He's saying DOGE came in, data went out, and Russians started attempting logins with new valid DOGE passwords
Media's coverage wasn't detailed enough so I dug into his testimony:
Det er vigtigt at værne om både demokratiet og retsstaten, netop derfor er det rigtigt, at domstolene ikke åbner op for, at civilsamfundsorganisationer uden direkte retlig interesse kan føre sager om dansk våbeneksport.
At NGO’er har medarbejdere i Gaza, og dermed føler sig berørt af konflikten, betyder ikke, at de automatisk skal have adgang til at få prøvet statens udenrigspolitiske beslutninger ved retten. Retsstaten bygger på klare juridiske principper, ikke på følelsesmæssig eller politisk tilknytning. Hvis vi først begynder at slække på kravet om retlig interesse, risikerer vi, at domstolene bliver et forum for politiske slagsmål, snarere end en uafhængig juridisk instans.
Danmark har en legitim ret til at føre sin egen udenrigs- og sikkerhedspolitik, inklusive eksportpolitik, og det er Folketinget, ikke NGO’er eller domstolene, der har ansvaret for at fastlægge den linje. Når man kræver, at domstolene skal kontrollere og i praksis kunne underkende eksportbeslutninger, fordi nogen kan tænkes at blive påvirket af dem indirekte, så svækker man både princippet om adskillelse mellem magtens grene og Danmarks politiske suverænitet.
Man kan sagtens være kritisk over for eksporten af våbendele til Israel, det er et legitimt politisk standpunkt, men kampen bør tages der, hvor den hører hjemme: i det politiske rum, ikke i retssalene.
Skal vi virkelig lade dansk våbenpolitik styres af udenlandske konflikter og følelsesladede kampagner? Israel har ret til at forsvare sig, og Danmark har ret til at handle med sine allierede. Hvis man vil ændre dansk eksportpolitik, så må man gøre det gennem Folketinget, ikke gennem domstole, presset af aktivistgrupper med en klar politisk agenda.
Det her handler ikke om retssikkerhed. Det handler om at nogle vil bruge domstolene til at gennemtvinge en ensidig, politisk korrekt dagsorden. Tak til Landsretten for at sige fra.
BREAKING: After Trump's disgraceful actions at the WH today with President Zelensky major world players just came out to defend Ukraine and Zelensky:
- Donald Trump and JD Vance: You never thank us... waa waa waa.
- Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk: ��Dear Zelensky, dear Ukrainian friends, you are not alone.”
- President of Lithuania Gitanas Nausea: “Ukraine, you’ll never walk alone.”
- Denmark Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen: “Dear Zelensky, Denmark proudly stands with Ukraine and the Ukrainian people.”
- French President Emmanual Macron: “There is an aggressor: Russia. There is a people being aggressed: Ukraine. We were all right to help Ukraine and sanction Russia three years ago and to continue doing so. We, that’s the Americans, the Europeans, Canadians, Japanese, and many others. Thank you to all those who have helped and continue to do so. And respect to those who, from the beginning, have been fighting. Because they are fighting for their dignity, their independence, for their children, and for the security of Europe.”
- President of Moldova Maia Sandu: “The truth is simple. Russia invaded Ukraine. Russia is the aggressor. Ukraine defends its freedom—and ours. We stand with Ukraine.”
- Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson: “Sweden stands with Ukraine. You are not only fighting for your freedom but also for all of Europe’s. Slava Ukraini! ”
- Incoming German Chancellor Friedrich Mer: “Dear Volodymyr @zelenskyyua, we stand with #Ukraine in good and in testing times. We must never confuse aggressor and victim in this terrible war. (FM)”
- Crotia’s Prime Minister Andrej Plenković: “Croatia knows from its own experience that only a just peace can last. The Croatian Government stands firm in its belief that Ukraine needs such a peace - a peace that means sovereignty, territorial integrity, and a secure Europe.”
- Finland’s Prime Minister @PetteriOrpo: “Finland and the Finnish people stand firmly with Ukraine. We will continue our unwavering support and work towards a just and lasting peace.”
- Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal: “We stand united with @ZelenskyyUa and Ukraine in our fight for freedom. Always. Because it is right, not easy.”
- Ireland’s Deputy Prime Minister Simon Harris: “Ukraine is not to blame for this war brought about by Russia’s illegal invasion. We stand with Ukraine.“
- Latvia’s President Edgars Rinkevics: “Ukraine is a victim of the Russian aggression. It fights the war with the help from many friends and partners. We need to spare no effort for just and lasting peace. Diplomacy sometimes is the art of the impossible in difficult circumstances. Latvia stands with Ukraine”
- Prime Minister of the Netherlands Dick Schoof: ”The Netherlands supports Ukraine as firmly as ever. Now more than ever. We want a lasting peace and an end to the war of aggression started by Russia. For Ukraine and its people, and for Europe.”
- Prime Minister of Luxembourg Luc Friedsen: “Luxembourg stands with Ukraine. You are fighting for your freedom and a rules based international order. ”
The West stands with the heroic Zelensky. Trump sides with the evil Putin. What has America become?