Schalk Van Wyk

[Schalk Van Wyk @schalamander]

This is a social experiment.
Is this square infinitely large.

[Schalk Van Wyk @schalamander]

@ScienceGuys_ F

[Schalk Van Wyk @schalamander]

@gunsnrosesgirl3 Thinking fast and slow by Daniel Kahneman

[Schalk Van Wyk @schalamander]

@jacobahalaba Infinty that can be defined within the symbol. Therefore it has an edge but since the edge is after infinity it doesnt change things if you go even further because infinity+1=infinity.

[Schalk Van Wyk @schalamander]

This is a social experiment.
Is this square infinitely large.

[Schalk Van Wyk @schalamander]

@MuskPhilosophy 6

[Schalk Van Wyk @schalamander]

@TechBurritoUno 4

[Schalk Van Wyk @schalamander]

@TechBurritoUno 1

[Schalk Van Wyk @schalamander]

@TechBurritoUno 2

[Schalk Van Wyk @schalamander]

@TechBurritoUno 14

[Schalk Van Wyk @schalamander]

4. of 4. it if it started harming humans so long as its primary directive was to not permantly harm any humans mentally or physically. This is only conjecture on my part and I would love it if someone could please clear this point up for me.

[Schalk Van Wyk @schalamander]

1. of 4.@elonmusk This is purely out of curiosity and I am not a professional in the field of AI but I was wondering about the safeguards that would have to be put in place. As I understand it, if you gave the AI the primary directive to save humanity it could possibly decide

[Schalk Van Wyk @schalamander]

3. of 4. is electronic based, it would not have emotions and since it doesn’t have emotions it has no fear of death. The only reason that it wouldn’t want to die would be if dying impeded its primary directive. Therefore I think that it would not fight against attempts to stop