Roman Schatow

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

Cate Blanchett wondered why #MeToo got “killed very quickly,” and honestly, people are acting like we didn’t all just watch @blakelively help put the final nail in it.

Lively’s fantastical sexual harassment claims got tossed by Judge Liman, yet the public is somehow still expected to applaud the performance like it was some fearless act of truth-telling… 🤡🤡
Her attorney, Sigrid McCawley, said Lively was focused on “exposing the digital retaliation campaign here that was weaponised against her.” Great — and the ideal place to expose the alleged retaliatory campaign would’ve been… court. You know, that inconvenient little place where evidence gets examined instead of curated through entertainment outlets and Instagram captions.
But somehow this “exposing” turned into dropping the claim, settling the lawsuit by @blakelively and then speed-running to the Met Gala three hours later dressed like the curtains from a condemned Versailles timeshare. Nothing says “I’m determined to expose the digital retaliation campaign” quite like abandoning the battlefield and immediately posing for Vogue photographers under chandelier lighting.

@blakelively doesn’t get to brand herself as bravely fighting injustice and then quietly exit before having to prove any of it under oath. At some point, people stop seeing Lively’s activism and start seeing luxury victimhood with a glam team attached.

You suck #blakelively / xoxo

[Variety @Variety]

Cate Blanchett in #Cannes:

"It's very disconcerting if you've found that you've worked with someone or are working with someone who has behaved in ways that are reprehensible."

[Kopiopisarz ♀ @kopiopisarz]

Cry amberturds, cry 😎
#EbenezerMovie

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

No screenshot this time? Why, what happened? LOL!

Hmmm... why is it that once again you've managed to provide absolutely ZERO arguments, while somehow trying to frame the discussion as though I'm the one who has absolutely no idea what I'm talking about?

Funny how the #WayfarParties eventually reached exactly the same conclusion I had predicted months earlier. But sure obvs. I'm the one who doesn't know what I'm talking about. 🤓🤓

And then there's Kathryn Ambeau, Ph.D., with actual specialisation in both clinical & forensic psychology, who has called "DARVO" junk science. 🤓🤓

I'll keep this exceptionally simple & short, since apparently anything more would be wasted effort: Now fuck off.

And perhaps next time try bringing an actual argument without a SCREENSHOT, MORON!!

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

No screenshot this time? Why, what happened? LOL!

Hmmm... why is it that once again you've managed to provide absolutely ZERO arguments, while somehow trying to frame the discussion as though I'm the one who has absolutely no idea what I'm talking about?

Funny how the #WayfarParties eventually reached exactly the same conclusion I had predicted months earlier. But sure obvs. I'm the one who doesn't know what I'm talking about. 🤓🤓

And then there's Kathryn Ambeau, Ph.D., with actual specialisation in both clinical & forensic psychology, who has called "DARVO" junk science. 🤓🤓

I'll keep this exceptionally simple & short, since apparently anything more would be wasted effort: Now fuck off.

And perhaps next time try bringing an actual argument without a SCREENSHOT, MORON!!

[Brad Conley⚖️🇺🇸 @JB_Conley]

@schatow You have no idea what you’re talking about. I was trying to keep it simple and help you understand.

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

@Polly01001011 @Supernatural979 Fucking hell... I'm honestly so confused atm. She clearly can't stand him, but she has signed script at home. She's really something. 😲😲

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

Before you decide to embark on another screenshot-mission... you might actually read what professionals have to say about "Keeping Junk Science Out of the Courtroom: Part Two – The Problem with DARVO" written by Kathryn Ambeau, Ph.D., ACTUAL specialisation in both clinical & forensic psychology.

Bye... bye... 😎😎

https://t.co/UgRRs8lz3D

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

HAHAHAHA! Thanks for demonstrating to the world that you know how to take a screenshot. LOL!!

Here's the problem with your VERY, VERY illuminating screenshot: unlike you, I actually read #BlakeLively's complaint & the Daubert standards.

Hmmm... how curious that the #WayfarerParties reached precisely the same conclusion I did.

On 28 December 2025, I wrote that I wouldn't be remotely surprised if the #WayfarerParties challenged Jennifer Freyd's expert “DARVO” report under the Daubert standard.

And guess what? On 4 November 2026, they did exactly that. 🤔🤔 What a big big surprise!! 🥳🥳

So... let me remind you why I predicted that Freyd's expert report was vulnerable to exclusion:

(1) The expert testimony was fundamentally useless in relation to the scope of the evidence #BlakeLively had agreed to pursue.
#BlakeLively had WAIVED expert mental-health evidence & agreed to pursue ONLY “garden-variety” emotional distress, relying on percipient witnesses rather than diagnostic or clinical expert testimony. Judge Liman's order PRECLUDED “medical evidence of emotional distress” while permitting evidence of garden-variety distress.

(2) Freyd's methodology was, quite frankly, a mess.
She:
— Did not interview #Lively.
— Did not review her medical records.
— Did not conduct clinical testing.
— Did not speak to her healthcare providers.
— Relied instead on litigation materials supplied by #Lively's own counsel.

And perhaps most importantly, Freyd is NOT a therapist or a licensed mental-health clinician.

Don't you think that one might reasonably wonder how an expert can offer opinions about an individual's psychological condition without conducting an ACTUAL clinical assessment by an ACTUAL licensed mental-health clinician. 🧐🧐

(3) The entire “low-level betrayal blindness” theory had serious admissibility problems.
Challenged on the grounds that it lacked sufficient fit & offered nothing beyond the understanding of an ordinary juror.
And let's not overlook the GIANT ELEPHANT in the room: #Lively's sexual-harassment claims had been DISMISSED, making it completely useless.

(4) What did Freyd’s report actually contribute?
It offered a collection of narrative opinions that essentially tracked & reinforced #BlakeLively's fantastical allegations (dismissed claims), rather than providing sufficiently reliable, independent expert analysis... meaning dressing up #Lively's litigation narrative in academic terminology does not magically transform it into admissible expert testimony.

... so, let's get this straight, shall we?! 🤓🤓

You haven't read the complaint. ✅
You haven't read the report. ✅
You haven't addressed the Daubert issues. ✅
You haven't offered a single substantive counterargument. ✅
But you have managed to produce ONE SINGLE screenshot. ✅

Congratulations. 👏🏽👏🏽

Unfortunately screenshots aren't reading the relevant shit!!

So yes... I'm laughing. 🤣🤣

Not because you proved anything with that screenshot, but because you seem to think you did. 😁😁

And the funniest part? I made the prediction months before the #WayfarerParties filed their challenge. 🥳🥳

But please... do keep explaining to the world how screenshots work. I'm tutt'orecchi. LOL.

[Brad Conley⚖️🇺🇸 @JB_Conley]

@schatow “I've had three years of sociology at uni and I know…”🤣

Jennifer Freyd, PhD, is a preeminent betrayal trauma expert. While DARVO is a catchy acronym that can be criticized, her research on things like betrayal blindness and institutional betrayal is novel and excellent.

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

@Lartrainer @tgiff1 @BlTEHARD A huge thank you from me & an extra-special thank-you from a veryyy hungry Matilda! ❤️🐾

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

Everything what is said is true but you UGLY PIECE OF SHIT—@BlTEHARD—can't refute anything so you concentrate on my hair.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

And remember the verdict has been public for years. The jury made 24 separate findings on the verdict form & those findings resulted in Amber Heard being found liable for defamation while Johnny Depp prevailed.

24 times, that Amber Heard’s statements were FALSE & DEFAMATORY.

The Virginia verdict is still the Virginia verdict & no amount of online shit from @BlTEHARD is going to erase that. 🤓🤓

SO KinDLy FUCK OFF—@BlTEHARD!!

[🕸️ @BlTEHARD]

loser who pays for twitter thinks this is a burn. maybe u should focus on stopping yourself from going bald

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

@Supernatural979 HAHAHAHA

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

HAHAHAHA! Thanks for demonstrating to the world that you know how to take a screenshot. LOL!!

Here's the problem with your VERY, VERY illuminating screenshot: unlike you, I actually read #BlakeLively's complaint & the Daubert standards.

Hmmm... how curious that the #WayfarerParties reached precisely the same conclusion I did.

On 28 December 2025, I wrote that I wouldn't be remotely surprised if the #WayfarerParties challenged Jennifer Freyd's expert “DARVO” report under the Daubert standard.

And guess what? On 4 November 2026, they did exactly that. 🤔🤔 What a big big surprise!! 🥳🥳

So... let me remind you why I predicted that Freyd's expert report was vulnerable to exclusion:

(1) The expert testimony was fundamentally useless in relation to the scope of the evidence #BlakeLively had agreed to pursue.
#BlakeLively had WAIVED expert mental-health evidence & agreed to pursue ONLY “garden-variety” emotional distress, relying on percipient witnesses rather than diagnostic or clinical expert testimony. Judge Liman's order PRECLUDED “medical evidence of emotional distress” while permitting evidence of garden-variety distress.

(2) Freyd's methodology was, quite frankly, a mess.
She:
— Did not interview #Lively.
— Did not review her medical records.
— Did not conduct clinical testing.
— Did not speak to her healthcare providers.
— Relied instead on litigation materials supplied by #Lively's own counsel.

And perhaps most importantly, Freyd is NOT a therapist or a licensed mental-health clinician.

Don't you think that one might reasonably wonder how an expert can offer opinions about an individual's psychological condition without conducting an ACTUAL clinical assessment by an ACTUAL licensed mental-health clinician. 🧐🧐

(3) The entire “low-level betrayal blindness” theory had serious admissibility problems.
Challenged on the grounds that it lacked sufficient fit & offered nothing beyond the understanding of an ordinary juror.
And let's not overlook the GIANT ELEPHANT in the room: #Lively's sexual-harassment claims had been DISMISSED, making it completely useless.

(4) What did Freyd’s report actually contribute?
It offered a collection of narrative opinions that essentially tracked & reinforced #BlakeLively's fantastical allegations (dismissed claims), rather than providing sufficiently reliable, independent expert analysis... meaning dressing up #Lively's litigation narrative in academic terminology does not magically transform it into admissible expert testimony.

... so, let's get this straight, shall we?! 🤓🤓

You haven't read the complaint. ✅
You haven't read the report. ✅
You haven't addressed the Daubert issues. ✅
You haven't offered a single substantive counterargument. ✅
But you have managed to produce ONE SINGLE screenshot. ✅

Congratulations. 👏🏽👏🏽

Unfortunately screenshots aren't reading the relevant shit!!

So yes... I'm laughing. 🤣🤣

Not because you proved anything with that screenshot, but because you seem to think you did. 😁😁

And the funniest part? I made the prediction months before the #WayfarerParties filed their challenge. 🥳🥳

But please... do keep explaining to the world how screenshots work. I'm tutt'orecchi. LOL.

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

@WrathfulProser_ 👏🏽👏🏽

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

@Polly01001011 They're certainly revealing a lot about themselves... the other day it was rimming, now it's pissing. What's next, I wonder? 🙃🙃 But let's not forget they're apparently speaking up to fight for women... one woman—AH! The irony!! 🙄🙄

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

@mandymagnan @MegynKellyShow @megynkelly @emilyjashinsky I saw this yesterday & I nearly fell off my chair! That woman is absolutely unhinged... her choice of language makes the whole thing even worse. Honestly I was speechless!

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

@ayeshadequeiroz That’s him. Pervert!!

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

And here’s the desperate shit from him.

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

👏👏👏👏

[Carol Erskine @TheCarolErskine]

Michael Morrissey’s attempt to deflect blame onto the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner for his decision not to file murder charges against Matthew Farwell, is a masterclass in bureaucratic cowardice and utter tone-deafness. Claiming his office was 'constrained' by the initial suicide finding completely insults the intelligence of the public.

As District Attorney, Morrissey had the resources, the authority, and the fundamental duty to hire independent experts when the evidence surrounding Sandra Birchmore’s death so clearly demanded a deeper look—something the family and federal investigators successfully managed to do without his help.

Instead of taking accountability for an egregious failure of local justice, he chose to pass the buck.

Morrissey deserves every shred of criticism he is receiving, and it is entirely fitting that he leaves office in absolute disgrace. That's how he will be remembered, no matter how many self-serving statements he makes.

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

@rockenrollah Yes yes and yes… 😍😍

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

#JustinBaldoni & #DWTS: a match made in heaven!! Honestly, I'd love to see this happen! ❤️💃🕺

[Radar Online @radar_online]

Julianne Hough reportedly wants Justin Baldoni to join the cast of dance competition program 'DWTS.' https://t.co/3VdpnbYTfs

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

@jose112y @Supernatural979 Omg… is that really her?!

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

@tgiff1 Hmmm… now you’ve really got me curious! I have absolutely no idea, but I’m so intrigued to find out! 😊😊

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

Relatable my BUTT 🍑🍑

[People @people]

Blake Lively Wears Husband Ryan Reynolds’ $990 Shirt Paired with Vintage Hermès Bag https://t.co/hc5ggOr3fA

[Roman Schatow @schatow]

@tgiff1 @BlTEHARD Thank you 😊😊