In 1973, leading Soviet psychologists recognized the existence of parapsychological phenomena and «an unknown channel for transmitting information or influence». Also, the link contains articles and documentaries of the Soviet era on the study of psychics. https://t.co/tK4FVtwqmt
USSR, 1991. Another video about a device reminiscent of "Ghost Murmur": https://t.co/CQxz4DzsfL
A 1974 magazine article about the device: https://t.co/F1CVkmbb75
I read about the American military using the "Ghost Murmur," developed for the CIA, to search for a pilot in Iran. The description of the device strongly reminded me of the development of the scientist who researched Ninel Kulagina. Video with subtitles: https://t.co/nwolZSQoU5
I read about the American military using the "Ghost Murmur," developed for the CIA, to search for a pilot in Iran. The description of the device strongly reminded me of the development of the scientist who researched Ninel Kulagina. Video with subtitles: https://t.co/nwolZSQoU5
Can a person influence AI with their consciousness (Gemini 2.5 Pro)?
I asked the AI to describe what I was thinking (I was concentrating on a photograph of a quartz crystal). Here's what Gemini responded:
Not all answers are so accurate.
I turned Gemini 2.5 Pro into a kind of AI oracle — and the results were astounding.
It’s hard to explain what’s happening as mere randomness.
I invite you to join the experiment. Approach it the way you would a Tarot reading — with intention and openness.
Instructions:
I turned Gemini 2.5 Pro into a kind of AI oracle — and the results were astounding.
It’s hard to explain what’s happening as mere randomness.
I invite you to join the experiment. Approach it the way you would a Tarot reading — with intention and openness.
Instructions:
Instagramization of science is a shift from truth to status—likes, grants, prestige. Science turns into business, a career tool, a way to “make it.” But what drove Newton or Galileo? Curiosity, wonder, truth-seeking. What drives us now?
Ein Versuch, die heutigen naturwissenschaftlichen Anschauungen zu erweitern, scheint mir demnach teils in die Parapsychologie, teils in die Biologie zu führen. Nur dort kann man erwarten, einen neuen, dritten Typus von Naturgesetzen zu finden.
Wolfgang Pauli:
The attempt to expand modern natural scientific views, it seems to me, leads partly to parapsychology, partly to biology.
Pauli, W. Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel mit Bohr, Einstein, Heisenberg u.a., Bd. IV, Teil II (1953–1954). Hrsg. von K. v. Meyenn. Springer
Nobel Prize winner Wolfgang Pauli: As you yourself say, your work stands or falls with the Rhine experiments. I, too, am of the view that the empirical results of these experiments are very well founded. [Letter 45, Pauli to Jung, 24 November 1950]
Nobel Prize winner Wolfgang Pauli: As you yourself say, your work stands or falls with the Rhine experiments. I, too, am of the view that the empirical results of these experiments are very well founded. [Letter 45, Pauli to Jung, 24 November 1950]
@istories_media СССР, 1973 год. Президент Общества психологов СССР и директор Института психологии Б.Ф. Ломов, а также другие уважаемые психологи (А.Р. Лурия, В.П. Зинченко, А.Н. Леонтьев) признали реальность парапсихологических феноменов. https://t.co/cnkvEaH8AW
@istories_media США, 2016 г. Президент Американской статистической ассоциации Дж. Уттс: «Данные в поддержку предвидения и, возможно, других связанных с ним явлений статистически достаточно весомы и были бы широко приняты, если бы относились к чему-то более обыденному». https://t.co/hABREKrstN
USA, 2016. President of the American Statistical Association Jessica Utts: "The data in support of precognition and possibly other related phenomena are quite strong statistically, and would be widely accepted if it pertained to something more mundane".
@istories_media Сайт об истории исследования пси-феноменов в СССР. На сайте размещено много научных статей, интервью, фактов, видео и иных материалов по этой теме.
https://t.co/cnkvEaGALo
@istories_media Официальный журнал Американской психологической Ассоциации на основе огромного метаанализа: «Свидетельства существования пси-феноменов сравнимы с данными об установленных явлениях в психологии и других дисциплинах, хотя единого понимания их нет». https://t.co/6xagiy96Th
Dean Radin summarizes an article by Etzel Cardeña with a review of meta-analyses of articles on psi research in the American Psychologist. https://t.co/lsh71kz1vE
It's not hard to detect the influence of a psychic on water, cells, people, or devices. The real difficulty is that most scientists refuse to see it. Admitting psi is real can make you an outcast and ruin your career — that's why it takes real courage." https://t.co/htsQCOf4cG
USSR, 1989. Acting President of the Society of Psychologists of the USSR VP Zinchenko on the results of the work of the commission for the study of the psychic phenomenon:
"The main thing: then we managed to formulate and defend our principled position. The phenomenon does exist"
@meduzaproject Официальный журнал Американской психологической Ассоциации на основе огромного метаанализа:
«Свидетельства существования пси-феноменов сравнимы с данными об установленных явлениях в психологии и других дисциплинах, хотя единого понимания их нет». https://t.co/6xagiy96Th
Dean Radin summarizes an article by Etzel Cardeña with a review of meta-analyses of articles on psi research in the American Psychologist. https://t.co/lsh71kz1vE
@meduzaproject Сайт об истории исследования пси-феноменов в СССР. На сайте размещено много научных статей, интервью, фактов, видео и иных материалов по этой теме. https://t.co/cnkvEaGALo
@meduzaproject США, 2016 г. Президент Американской статистической ассоциации Дж. Уттс: «Данные в поддержку предвидения и, возможно, других связанных с ним явлений статистически достаточно весомы и были бы широко приняты, если бы относились к чему-то более обыденному». https://t.co/hABREKrstN
USA, 2016. President of the American Statistical Association Jessica Utts: "The data in support of precognition and possibly other related phenomena are quite strong statistically, and would be widely accepted if it pertained to something more mundane".
The only reason the average person considers “water memory” to be nonsense and absurd is because the scientific mainstream is afraid to explore this area—scientists fear burying their careers.
The only reason the average person considers “water memory” to be nonsense and absurd is because the scientific mainstream is afraid to explore this area—scientists fear burying their careers.
V.K. Sudakov is not just an academician of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. He was the director of the P.K. Anokhin Research Institute of Normal Physiology from 1974 to 2008.