Foreign heads of state are sovereign leaders, not local corporators. They decide their own itineraries and do not take dictation from South Block on who they can or cannot meet.
If visiting leaders are skipping the LoP, it is simply because meeting him yields absolutely zero strategic dividend. They come to India to conduct serious geopolitics, not to listen to a teenager complain about democracy. Stop hallucinating, Pravin.
Tell me, Tamgha-e-Imtiyaz winner Haider Naqvi, did the Pakistani state award you this medal specifically for your outstanding contribution to peddling fake news?
The video you are sharing is a cheap AI-generated fake. No such statement was ever made. But I don't blame you. When your entire national narrative is built on lies, begging, and hallucinations, a little AI deepfake fits right in.
The actual problem with the Drishti-10 is different. It is a white-labeled import. We do not own the IP.
> When an imported system needs modifications or enhancements for our specific operational conditions, our hands are tied. We have to run back to the foreign OEM for every minor change.
> Slapping a desi name on foreign tech gives great optics, but zero strategic autonomy.
> We need indigenous systems where the design, the IP, and the control belong exclusively to India.
@Nazia_afghani It is a historical fact. Pakistan’s geography and military are always available for rent.
These people are professional liars.
Jhoot inke DNA mein hai. They have no answers, only fresh excuses when the dollars run out.
Pakistan is an acronym invented in a Cambridge dorm room in 1933. India is a 5,000-year-old civilization. Even your grandfathers served in the British Indian Army, not the British Pakistani Army.
Look at the state of Muslims in India? An Indian Muslim was our President and built our missile program. In your Islamic utopia, Muslims blow up other Muslims in mosques every Friday. Shias and Ahmadis are slaughtered by mobs.
You wanted a separate country. You got it. Now stop crying and go pay your IMF installments.
Your "commendable decision" in 1947 was a complete civilizational divorce. You didn't just ask for a separate country, you demanded a separate identity.
You can't spend decades LARPing as Middle Eastern conquerors and then suddenly demand custody of the Indus Valley Civilization when you realize your Arab daddies don't care about you. You made a conscious choice to identify with the invaders rather than your own ancestors. Now live with it.
You are comparing a few random internet trolls to a state policy of minority extinction. Jemimah Rodrigues wears the India blue, wins matches for us, and is a celebrated national hero. In your country, Christians aren't trolled online. They are burnt alive by mobs in places like Jaranwala over fake blasphemy charges while the state looks the other way.
As for the religious sites, nobody is inventing claims out of thin air. We are simply digging up the archaeological evidence that your beloved invaders tried to bury. Taking back stolen property is not erasing history. It is correcting it.
When you run out of logic, you immediately deflect and start crying about victimhood. Typical Pakistani playbook.
We don’t need a deciphered script to recognize our own culture. The Pashupati seal is Shiva. The Swastikas, the fire altars, the worship of the Peepal tree, the ritual bathing in the Great Bath—these aren't archaeological mysteries. They are living Hindu traditions practiced by a billion people today.
Stick to your imported Arab lineage. Leave the Indus to the people who actually kept its traditions alive.
Living on top of a ruin doesn’t make you the inheritor of the civilization. If you rent an apartment in Rome, you don’t become Julius Caesar.
You abandoned your actual ancestors to worship the men who slaughtered them. Keep the imported lineage you begged for. Do not try to steal ours.
You fought a bloody partition because you explicitly did not want to be Indian. You adopted a brand-new acronym invented in 1933 called 'Pakistan' just to escape this very heritage.
And now you are whining that we kept our own name?
Under international law, the Republic of India is the legal successor state to British India. We retained the name, the historical continuity, and the global identity. We didn't deprive you of anything. You deliberately threw away your claim to this heritage the day you chose the Two-Nation Theory and became an Islamic Republic.
The Indian Ocean and the subcontinent are named after the civilization that we still proudly represent. You wanted a separate identity. You got it. Stop begging for ours.
The land didn’t lose its history. You deliberately erased it. The ancestors who lived on that land for millennia were Hindus and Buddhists. Pakistan has spent over seven decades destroying their temples, wiping them from school textbooks, and desperately faking Arab and Turkic bloodlines.
You made a conscious choice in 1947. You chose the invaders over your own ancestors. Now live with it.
Modern Hinduism is the direct, unbroken successor to the Indus Valley Civilization. We still worship Shiva as Pashupati. We still revere the Swastika, the peepal tree, and the sacred rivers. We practice today what was practiced 5,000 years ago. It is a civilizational continuum.
Pakistan’s existence is based on violently rejecting that very heritage. You literally teach your children that your history started with Muhammad bin Qasim. Your establishment desperately claims Arab, Turkic, and Persian descent. You name your weapons after the very invaders who slaughtered the indigenous population.
You cannot base your entire national identity on the invaders and then try to claim the legacy of the invaded. Resolve your identity crisis first.
You don't get to name your missiles after Ghauri, Ghaznavi and Abdali, and then claim ownership of the Indus Valley Civilization.
> The entire foundation of Pakistan in 1947 was the Two-Nation Theory.
> It was a conscious, deliberate rejection of this very civilizational identity in favour of an imported Arab lineage.
> You teach your children that your history started with Muhammad bin Qasim.
> You chose to identify with the invaders who plundered the Indus, not the indigenous people who built it.
You cannot completely sever ties with your civilizational roots and then demand joint custody of the history.
You are either the children of the Indus or the children of the invaders. Pick one.
The name India is derived from the river Sindhu. The Persians pronounced it Hindu, and the Greeks called it Indus. It has been our global identity for millennia.
The modern Republic of India is the sole civilizational and legal successor to that ancient land. Article 1 of our Constitution clearly states, "India, that is Bharat." They are the exact same entity. We own both.
India did not randomly choose a name out of a hat. The Greeks and Persians identified this land and its people by the Sindhu river thousands of years before Pakistan was even a hallucination. The Rigveda invokes the Sindhu. Our ancestors built the civilization around it.
Comparing millennia of continuous civilizational heritage to a hypothetical corporate rebranding with the Yangtze is peak intellectual bankruptcy.
Read a basic history book instead of Pak studies before tweeting.
We paid a horrific price, but let us not forget the outcome: the Indian state crushed them completely. The Punjab Police under KPS Gill hunted them down and broke their spine. The people of Punjab threw them into the dustbin of history.
Today, a few daily-wage earners of the ISI sitting in Brampton and Southall think they can revive this dead snake. They are hallucinating. Let them jump around on foreign soil for their local vote-bank masters. If they try bringing their madness back to India, they will find out the hard way that this is not 1985.
The Indian state has a very long memory. And a much longer reach.
Assassination of Sitting PM
Assassination of Sitting CM
Assassination of Former Army Chief (6 months after retirement)
Assassination of member of the Punjab Legislative Assembly, Member of Parliament, and founder of the Hind Samachar media group.
Assassination attempts on two police chiefs
Worst Plane bombing in history of aviation
Train Massacres
Bus Massacres
Chandigarh Secretariat Bombing
This is what I can remember amongst the ‘big’ attacks. Khalistani terrorists have extracted a huge price from India already.
You talk about religion like it is a corporate merger or a trade union strategy to gain leverage against the state.
In the Indian Army, Hindu Jats and Sikh Jats fight shoulder to shoulder. They bleed together and die together for this country. They understand brotherhood and valor far better than some social media strategist trying to engineer divisions.
And since when did Indian Jats become a "qaum"? That vocabulary comes straight from across the border.
Yeh propaganda kahin aur becho.
Tavleen Singh is no friend of the BJP or RSS. Her liberal politics are well known. But when it comes to the dark reality of Punjab separatism, her eyewitness accounts tear through the romanticized bullshit built around Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale.
When she openly wrote that seeing weapons and ammunition stacked inside the Golden Temple made her ashamed as a Sikh, Bhindranwale was furious. He would have had her killed. She was spared for only one reason—her Jat Sikh background. Modern Khalistanis lecture the world on egalitarian brotherhood and equality, yet their icon operated on pure caste-based tribalism.
Look at the language Bhindranwale used for Prime Minister Indira Gandhi: "Pandita di dhii nu dikha deyange". This wasn't a saint fighting for religious freedom. This was a communal bigot steeped in anti-Brahmin hatred, treating a sacred shrine like a warlord's bunker. Read the accounts of those who were actually on the ground before swallowing the propaganda being manufactured in Surrey and Southall today.
There is no mystery why Punjabi intellectuals only criticize Bhindranwale behind closed doors. It is plain cowardice.
Bhindranwale was no "Sant". Saints do not stockpile heavy weapons inside the Darbar Sahib. Saints do not order the execution of innocent civilians. He was a terrorist who weaponized religion and pushed Punjab into a decade of relentless bloodshed. He damaged the social fabric of Punjab more than anyone else in modern history.
The intellectuals know this perfectly well. But the moment a microphone is turned on, they lose their spine. You cannot fight radicalism if the educated elite is too terrified to speak the truth on the record.
Stop sanitizing history. Call a terrorist a terrorist.