help

RTs and Follows are not endorsements

[Paddle Steamer Waverley @PS_Waverley]

Waverley captured sounding her whistle today (Saturday 26th Sept) as she passed under Tower Bridge on the start of her cruise down the Thames to Tilbury, Southend and the River Medway.

Waverley sails on the Thames until Sunday 11th October - book your tickets online at https://t.co/aM97yLGsWP

[Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧 @TiceRichard]

Huge BBC Hamas scandal

Over 50 alleged terrorists claimed by BBC to be alleged journalists

What happened to BBC Verify?

https://t.co/9lAiMckNV6

[David Paton @cricketwyvern]

The Home Secretary should indeed intervene.

Thugs should not be allowed to prevent the democratic process fron functioning.

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

When Muslim Thugs throw plastic bottles at Police they get no prison time

If a patriot does it he gets two years in prison

Are you seeing the two tier criminal justice system yet?

[Nick Timothy MP @NJ_Timothy]

This is so depressing.

A Green Party election leaflet from Holborn and St Pancras wrapped in a foreign flag, boasting endorsements from The Muslim Vote and Camden Muslim Alliance.

This is just naked sectarianism.

[Ben Graham @BenGrahamUK]

This footage is going to become a big headache for the police.

A police officer appears to pretend he has been hit by a car.

Seconds later, the elderly man behind the wheel is dragged out of the vehicle and thrown to the ground.

How are the public supposed to trust the police to enforce the law when incidents like this happen?

This needs investigating properly, and if the footage is as it appears, there must be accountability for every officer involved.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

This is what our team is facing as they try to campaign for Restore Britain in Holborn and St Pancras today.

It is disgraceful.

[Julia Hartley-Brewer @JuliaHB1]

This footage is absolutely shocking. Watch the man (father??) carrying the small child and then deserting the child to get on the boat. Impossible to comprehend.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

Every glib, arrogant, virtue-signalling celebrity who’s broadcast the lie that kids will kill themselves if not allowed to transition deserves to have this read aloud to them non-stop through a megaphone for a year.

[Chris Musson @ChrisMusson]

EXCL: Scot Gov cancelled cheap World Cup flights for John Swinney and aides after the Holyrood election ... and booked them onto business class, costing taxpayers potentially tens of thousands more. Nice work if you can get it.
https://t.co/2bupueFsb8

[Kurt Mahlburg @k_mahlburg]

A landmark Finnish study has found a sharp rise in psychiatric illness among adolescents following sex-alteration procedures.

The peer-reviewed study, published in Acta Paediatrica, tracked every young person under 23 who contacted Finland's gender clinics between 1996 and 2019.

A total 2,083 individuals were studied, with 16,643 matched controls. They were followed for up to 25 years.

Finland's health registers are mandatory, which means no one opts out — this is the complete national picture.

The numbers: psychiatric morbidity rose from 9.8% to 60.7% in adolescents who underwent feminising reassignment, and from 21.6% to 54.5% in masculinising reassignment.

Even after adjusting for prior psychiatric history, gender-referred adolescents faced five times the risk of male population controls, and three times the risk of female controls.

"Psychiatric needs do not subside after medical gender reassignment," the authors concluded.

Referrals after 2010 arrived sicker. 47.9% had already needed psychiatric treatment before their first clinic visit, against 15.3% among controls.

The authors' read: for some adolescents, gender distress may be secondary to other mental health challenges.

The evidence keeps mounting. The silencing continues anyway.

How many more adolescents will be told this is "care"?

[The Wee Glesga Poet @weeglesgapoet]

@ThomasKerrMSP called it a ghetto,
But the media disagree,
One of the worlds ‘coolest’ neighbourhoods,
Nicola Sturgeons old constituency,
This is what they don’t want you to see,
Nothing you should aspire to be,
I wouldn’t believe the fake plaudits.
Because it looks like a ghetto to me!

[Annunziata Rees-Mogg @zatzi]

Nandy has spent a political lifetime pretending to support women. 👇

Spoiler: she doesn’t.

She said we did t need a National Inquiry into Rape Gangs

She ignored women’s rights’ charities and domestic violence campaigners to support assisted dying

She thinks men should be allowed in women’s prisons and women’s sport.

[Mark Irvine @Mark1957]

I'm not a Labour member or supporter, but Jackie Baillie is spot on here with her take down of John Swinney

[Wings Over Scotland @WingsScotland]

Swinney’s World Cup flights approved by official who tweaked rules

https://t.co/xbx7ugE8Av

[Christian @InTheTrenchesUK]

This ugly human being, according to Andy Burnham, is the Chancellor in charge of England's money.

John Healey wants to talk about "Britain's growth story." Let's talk about the story he already wrote.

In Rotherham, while he was MP, 1,400 girls were raped. Industrial-scale child sexual exploitation. Healey knew. Everyone knew. When The Times broke the story and demanded an inquiry in 2012, Healey opposed it. His own website still carries his excuse: "not convinced this would help the abused girls."

Not convinced. While the men kept raping and the council kept covering it up, Healey wanted more time.

Two years later, the Alexis Jay Report confirmed 1,400 victims. Healey had been "not convinced" through 1,400 rapes.

Then came the money. UKIP MEP Jane Collins accused him of knowing and doing nothing. He sued her for libel. Won £54,000 in damages. Kept it. Did not hand it to survivors. Did not donate it to charities. Pocketed fifty-four thousand pounds because someone said he failed those girls, and he proved in court that legally he hadn't failed them badly enough.

That is the man Burnham made Chancellor.

The same Healey who backed Kin Kids charity in Rotherham, whose founder Vicki MacGregor was later convicted of child sexual abuse offences. Who vouched for a paedophile's charity in the same streets where 1,400 children were raped.

The same Healey who failed to pay council tax on his London second home as Defence Secretary. "Administrative error." The man who decides the national budget cannot manage his own bills.

The same Healey whose Child Trust Fund scheme has £1.6 billion of children's money sitting in forgotten accounts while fund managers extract £100 million annually in fees. A "gift to every British child" that became an annuity for the City.

The same Healey who resigned as Defence Secretary in June 2026, helped collapse Starmer's government, and six weeks later accepted promotion to Chancellor from Burnham. The knife goes in. The chair is warm.

Twenty-nine years as an MP. St Peter's School York. Christ's College Cambridge. Fabian Society. TUC campaigns. Zero days in a real job. Zero days answering to anyone outside the machine.

That girl from Rotherham is thirty-seven now. She lives with the petrol and the threats every day. John Healey lives in Downing Street. He signs the cheques. He decides how much of your money you keep.

Every signature from the man who was "not convinced" an inquiry into industrial-scale child rape would help the victims.

He is trying to reinvent himself again. We are fucking sick of it.

https://t.co/581ORZ0m04

[Andrew Neil @afneil]

They’re all against it. Until they get a chance to join it.

[help @scotlandwakeup]

@NotFarLeftAtAll So they were well warned 😳
Surely all the more reason NOT to have behaved in this way 🤔🤷‍♀️

[Agent P @AgentP22]

Glasgow’s finances are in chaos and the SNP answer is to redraw the map and get East Renfrewshire’s council tax payers to pick up the tab.

The brass neck is astonishing.

https://t.co/x5dsmrzJxM

[Julia Hartley-Brewer @JuliaHB1]

No state-funded school should require girls as young as seven to cover their hair.

No school in Britain, of any faith and however it's funded, should be allowed to require girls of ANY age to cover their hair.

The hijab is a garment that is only required because apparently men cannot be trusted not to sexually lust after women - and young girls - unless they show "modesty".

That puts the responsibility for sexual assault onto the women and girls, not their male attackers.

How can anyone think this is okay?