Scott David Workman

#love my #God, Family and Country! #liberty #freedom #FOTOC #ConstitutionalGovt #DOR

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

After exhausting YouTube support, TeamYouTube outreach, and a formal BBB complaint (Case #24709789), Google has refused substantive review of an unauthorized transfer of our legacy monetized YouTube Brand Account.

We provided:
• AdSense monetization records
• Administrative history
• Identity linkage
• Historical ownership evidence

Despite this, Google continues routing the case through generic login recovery systems that do not address ownership disputes.

BBB has now formally closed the complaint as unresolved.

If no meaningful action is taken, California Attorney General regulatory escalation will be the next step.

@TeamYouTube @YouTube @Google

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

The current system appears to offer no meaningful recovery path when historical ownership can be substantiated, but login access has been lost or ownership transferred without authorization.

That is a serious platform accountability issue.

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

After exhausting YouTube support, TeamYouTube outreach, and a formal BBB complaint (Case #24709789), Google has refused substantive review of an unauthorized transfer of our legacy monetized YouTube Brand Account.

We provided:
• AdSense monetization records
• Administrative history
• Identity linkage
• Historical ownership evidence

Despite this, Google continues routing the case through generic login recovery systems that do not address ownership disputes.

BBB has now formally closed the complaint as unresolved.

If no meaningful action is taken, California Attorney General regulatory escalation will be the next step.

@TeamYouTube @YouTube @Google

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

This is not a standard login issue.

This is a documented ownership/control dispute involving a legacy Brand Account with over 8K subscribers and historical monetization.

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

After years of building my professional presence on LinkedIn, fully complying with identity verification, and exhausting every recovery path, my legitimate long-standing account has now been permanently restricted with no meaningful explanation beyond vague policy claims.

Multiple technical failures, obsolete email misrouting, duplicate account confusion, weeks of ignored support, and final account suppression have resulted in what appears to be clear digital de-platforming.

This is bigger than one account.

When platforms hold monopoly-level control over professional visibility, networking, and digital identity, opaque enforcement and ideological conformity become serious threats.

If you question narratives, refuse to conform, or operate outside approved frameworks, you may eventually find yourself erased without due process.

My case is now fully documented.

@LinkedInHelp @LinkedIn @Microsoft

The public deserves transparency:

What exact policies were violated?
Why was full identity compliance ignored?
Why were years of professional history erased?
Why are users given no meaningful appeal?

Digital professional suppression is real.

Today it’s me.
Tomorrow it could be anyone who falls outside acceptable corporate ideology.
#LinkedIn #Deplatforming #FreeSpeech #DigitalRights #Censorship #ProfessionalFreedom #Accountability

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

Following up — BBB case #24709789 is now active.

This is an ownership dispute, not a login issue.

Requesting escalation to a team that handles legacy Brand Account ownership.

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

@TeamYouTube
I need help recovering a hijacked legacy YouTube channel (ID: UChbz6F-5Zf7k55AXKwcqt0g).

I’ve already worked with support and provided AdSense records, copyright filings, and proof of original ownership — but my case has now stalled with no response.

Can someone escalate this?

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

@TeamYouTube I need help with a channel ownership issue.

This is NOT a login problem — it’s an unauthorized ownership transfer of a legacy Brand Account (8K+ subscribers).

I’ve already:
• Filed a BBB complaint (case #24709789)
• Provided AdSense records + identity proof

If this cannot be reviewed, I may need to pursue copyright claims as the identifiable creator.

Requesting manual review.

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

Following up — @TeamYouTube you previously indicated a DM would be sent, but this issue remains unresolved.

This is not a login issue. It is an unauthorized ownership transfer of a legacy Brand Account.

Happy to provide all documentation again.

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

I just filed a formal complaint with the BBB against Google regarding a YouTube channel ownership issue.

A legacy Brand Account (8K+ subscribers, Channel ID: UChbz6F-5Zf7k55AXKwcqt0g) was transferred without my authorization.

I’ve provided AdSense records, admin emails, and identity proof.

Support continues routing this through login recovery — but this is not a login issue. It’s an ownership dispute involving unauthorized transfer of control.

Requesting a manual review from @TeamYouTube @YouTube @Google

Case now formally documented via BBB.

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

Additional context: This involves a legacy Google+ Brand Account structure with no clear recovery path through standard support.

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

@YouTube @Google I need help resolving a stalled YouTube channel recovery case (2+ months).

Channel ID: UChbz6F-5Zf7k55AXKwcqt0g
Case ID: 3-1214000040594

Issue: Legacy Brand Account (no login exists), but support keeps routing through login-based recovery.

Evidence provided:
- AdSense records (2014)
- Historical admin/copyright records
- Identity linkage

Current status: No resolution, no escalation path.

Can this be reviewed by a team that handles legacy account ownership verification?

@TeamYouTube

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

Update: I’ve now posted this in the YouTube Help Community as well.

Case ID: 3-1214000040594

Given this involves a legacy Brand Account (no login exists), I’m trying to ensure it reaches the correct team for historical ownership review.

Would appreciate help routing this appropriately.

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

Still trying to get traction on this.

I’ve been working with support for ~2 months to recover a legacy YouTube channel (ID: UChbz6F-5Zf7k55AXKwcqt0g) tied to a deprecated Google+ Brand Account.

I’ve provided AdSense records, historical admin evidence, and identity linkage — but the case remains stuck in a login-based recovery loop that doesn’t apply to this type of account.

I’ve reached out via DM and email (Case ID: 3-1214000040594) but haven’t received a response.

Can someone help route this to the correct team for legacy account review?

@TeamYouTube @YouTube

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

Following up here — I’ve responded via DM and email but haven’t received a reply.

This case involves a legacy Brand Account (no valid login email), so it cannot be resolved through standard recovery steps.

Trying to ensure Case ID: 3-1214000040594 is routed to the correct team for review.

Appreciate the help.

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

@haysan01 @TeamYouTube Appreciate that — was your situation a legacy/Brand Account issue too?

Trying to recover a 2013-era channel tied to a deprecated Google+ Brand Account, so standard support isn’t working.

Any details you can share would help.

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

Case ID: 3-1214000040594

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

@TeamYouTube Thanks for the response. I’m now following and have enabled DMs from verified users. Ready to provide any details needed.

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

@TeamYouTube I’m the original creator of this YouTube channel:
https://t.co/ha8fsgXeEN

I lost access years ago due to what appears to be an unauthorized ownership removal or Brand Account migration. The channel still exists publicly, but no email I control is associated with it.

Standard recovery tools no longer work due to the age of the incident. Is there any way to request a manual ownership review based on historical control and channel URL?

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

@TeamYouTube I’m the original creator of this YouTube channel:
https://t.co/ha8fsgXeEN

I lost access years ago due to what appears to be an unauthorized ownership removal or Brand Account migration. The channel still exists publicly, but no email I control is associated with it.

Standard recovery tools no longer work due to the age of the incident. Is there any way to request a manual ownership review based on historical control and channel URL?

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

@xAI @Grok Premium X/SuperGrok user. https://t.co/5VI5xkQL4F & 1-833-YUR-GORK are useless—mortgage AI & joke line! Thread errors (“unable to reply,” 12+ tries) & legal doc failures persist on https://t.co/M2LCVnqVdI, Chrome 128.0, Win10. Reddit (r/grok) confirms. Give a real support link & fix date! #GrokIssues

[Scott David Workman @scottdworkman]

@xAI @Grok @elonmusk Grok’s been failing for a week—thread errors (‘unable to reply’) & weak complex task handling. Reddit’s full of similar complaints. Are there new rate limits? Please fix ASAP! #GrokIssues