Scott Widen

#liberty #freedom #constitution #antiwar #endthefed #MAGA24 #harriswillnotbepresident

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@AntiWokeMemes Depending on service, anywhere from $11 to $20

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@glam_queenn @HammedOlayemi17 1, 3 or 5 in that order

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@EmilySm43 $15 minimum if service was good.

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@WHLeavitt A

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@CurtWilkerson_ So frustrating! Their getting second chance shots and hitting 3’s

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@Victoria00025 Who is he and who cares.

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@otokyo D

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@FFT1776 Anonymous source. @SenRandPaul has always been not interventionist. Please don’t jump to conclusions on one of the best patriots in the USA!🇺🇸

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

HOLY CR*P 🚨 The day Charlie Kirk was killed and everyone was focused on that, Gavin Newsom and California Democrats rammed through an online censorship bill

PENALTIES

- If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000.
- For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million

“SB 771, passing the Assembly on September 10th, 10 days ago. Then on September 16th, passing the Senate completely under our noses, which means right now, all that stands between complete statewide government censorship is Gavin Newsom's signature”

“I exaggerating about how bad this bill is? No, I am not. Here is the actual bill. You can pull this up yourself on the state's website.

The Bill's called SB 771. It's called Personal Rights Liability, Social Media Platforms.

In Section 2, Title 23 of the Bill, it defines the penalties for breaking this new California law

- If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state, the State of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000
- For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million.

That is the definition of the state controlling speech, folks.

— What type of speech is California trying to police here? Well, let's read from the Bill. It says, "This bill protects against online harassment, particularly when directed at historically marginalized groups."

“the State of California's actively passing UK style laws that will fine you for saying the wrong thing. Pretty wild. And this bill is completely done, folks. It's passed in the House, it's passed in the Senate. All that's left is Gavin Newsom signing it into law”

This is all 100% true, he even clipped screenshots from the bill and put it into the video as proof

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@libsoftiktok Can’t believe these people exist 🙁

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@IsabellaIsMoody He is one of a kind in a way that I can’t stand to listen to for even a second.

[EllioTrades @elliotrades]

Can’t believe you sold the bottom

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@TaraBull808 Ugly!

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@MAGAVoice Zero!

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@ThePatriotOasis Awesome 👏

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@IanJaeger29 Perfect!

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

I’m sure the RINOS from Arkansas @SenTomCotton @JohnBoozman voted for @SenJohnThune and went against what the people would want for a new leader. Embarrassed as usual for of our representatives!

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@SenJohnThune You are fake and a RINO we don’t want you for leader!

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@MarshaBlackburn @SenRickScott but would love @SenRandPaul

[Scott Widen @scottfree]

@realTrumpNewsX 👍 Rather have @SenRandPaul but thats better than Thune and Cornyn