Scott G.

soccer
technology
guitar
...soccer

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

@Frenck I thought it was against the rules to use spook 🤔

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

@RubenKelevra @joostlek @EverySmartHome I can see both sides because maintainers need to know if issues are still relevant, but I can also relate to being frustrated by bumping issues I've reported over and over. That said, I think issues closed by a bot should always be reopenable by the original issue creator.

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

I’ve been working on a lightweight CI server for a while now: https://t.co/yxT5wIwk6M

It's focus is on local reproducible builds. You can read up more on my site: https://t.co/xGs1SQxGye

Looking for any kind of feedback, so let me know what you think! :)

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

@cdoremus @deno_land @ndubien Congrats!

I recently dove deep into property-based tests and loved them. I might go as far as to say if you ever have test data in your unit test, it should be a property-based test.

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

@jpetazzo That's fair. I think it would be hard to get across succinctly without unnecessary bloat to the article. If you'll add it to your writing topic instead of queue, I'll be sure to subscribe :)

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

@jpetazzo I was reading over https://t.co/F7aysBwJRY for the 100th time (great article). Thoughts on mentioning the drawbacks of using docker.sock? Those sibling containers can fully control one another which is risky to allow in a CI environment (e.g. access another's secrets).

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

@pobega 👉😎👉

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

@olivierthereaux Apologies, I'm guessing this is related to my RSS validator email :)
It was hard to find a clear answer to who I should contact on the site. Contact links were either broken or inactive and your name was fairly prominent. Appreciate you pointing me in the right direction, though.

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

Did you know the annual per capita consumption of cheese correlates almost perfectly with the number of people who die each year from becoming entangled in their bedsheets? 🤔

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

@pobega Tonight.
You.

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

Protip: Add 20k no-op lines to a function that has test coverage to increase your coverage %

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

@cdoremus I've noticed this happens to me so much! Stepping away from a problem in general is helpful.

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

@cdoremus @code Or switch to @intellijidea 😉

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

@cdoremus Haha not sure where you got that idea! Those are both my LEAST favorite languages

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

The order of parameters to a function is arbitrary. Code using named parameters is always comparatively easier to read. Thus, named parameters should always be used (when possible) instead of ordered parameters. Change my mind.

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

@pobega Were you going into battle?

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

@jejb_ Hey, James. I was actually able to get it working on EC2. We had some interesting discussions over on the sysbox github project in case you're interested:
https://t.co/E4q0UMzmzb

https://t.co/9Qs6Cb3KGx

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

@jejb_ I know this is a long shot, but are you familiar with the sysbox project? One component of it involves using shiftfs, which I believe you wrote. Do you know of any technical limitations of why this wouldn't be able to be run in a virtualized/cloud environment (i.e. EC2)?

[Scott G. @ScottG489]

@bfirsh In the below comment you mention that you should be able to run sysbox in EC2. I'm unable to find any AMIs that have shiftfs in order to do this. Are you aware of any? Info is hard to come by.
https://t.co/dP2ZjVxSnH