The first question most people get asked about work is: what do you do?
It’s a reasonable question, and it’s also the wrong one to start with.
https://t.co/HO9BJ8fQLF
Jane Jacobs looked at the same cities Le Corbusier designed and saw something completely different. That tension is worth thinking about right now with AI and work.
When cities were treated purely as machines, something human got lost. Streets became systems. Neighborhoods became zones. Life became optimized, but often less alive.
AI may do the same to work.
https://t.co/iDDRIP95iV
Only 15% of graduates work in fields related to their major.
We spend four years optimizing for specificity.
85% pivot.
And work is being redesigned faster than education can keep up.
We're preparing people for stability that doesn't exist, in jobs that might not either.
As AI does more of the talking, the things that are unmistakably human start to carry more weight, not less.
You know them when you encounter them:
The handwritten note...
https://t.co/5ohddEiK4j
Every architecture student learns to draw by hand.
Not because firms still draft by hand. They don’t. The industry runs on BIM software now — complex, powerful, collaborative platforms that produce things no hand drawing ever could.
But schools still start with a pencil and trace paper. And they’re right to...
https://t.co/iTp8BnCA09
When you only measure output, you can tell what someone did. You can’t tell much about what they’ll do, or why, or in what environments they’ll do it well.
The organizations that figure this out aren’t smarter. They’ve just learned to look at something the standard system isn’t designed to see.
https://t.co/6VQO6kPXyg