Scott Strange

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@austinjames0104 @RandPaul Because they don’t want to work with congress. They want a dictator

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@BahlestKimmie @RandPaul @EmjaeS99 Birth tourism is minuscule. The administration couldn’t even give the court numbers so they ignored it in their deliberations

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@acorn_CERN_sezn @dstahlman @RandPaul It’s your ignorance that makes it impossible to amend the constitution. We used to do it, but the lack of compromise makes it impossible

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@dstahlman @RandPaul We would amend it. Or make laws to quantify the positions. Just like “8 USC 1401: Nationals and citizens of United States at birth”

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@RandPaul Why not amend “8 USC 1401: Nationals and citizens of United States at birth”. The 14th amendment can be quantified by legislation

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@tedcruz A lot of houses in the us don’t have ac. Southwestern states have. Many other places it used to be unnecessary. I guess climate change isn’t fake after all

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@RepNancyMace My guess is legislation could be used to clarify and not require an amendment

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@RepNancyMace Have someone that knows the law write that. . A person born in the United States is “subject to the jurisdiction”. This would mean we cannot prosecute foreigners for crimes when in the U.S. Thag does not need I the text

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@sarahtexe It’s not worth the headache. It is minuscule.

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@RealKahall 8 USC 1401: Nationals and citizens of United States at birth. This is an example what Congress has done to quantify. This could be altered by Congress. But instead this president thinks executive orders are the way to govern. SCOTUS cannot make laws

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@ksorbs Evidently you are confused in what draft legislation is and the actual legislation passed

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@Notwokenow That’s a waste of money since they can only enforce immigration laws and customs issues. You may think they are your brown shirts. But they have limited jurisdiction

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@Ben_Westen @ImBreckWorsham Exactly. The court did right based on the constitution and current law. The constitution and laws can be changed and the court does not create laws. People that don’t like the decision need to pull themselves up by the bootstraps and start to get it changed

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@AngelaBelcamino Because when someone is in this soils and not a foreign diplomat they are under our jurisdiction. Ever wonder why we can put foreign criminals in jail?

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@NerdyMom47 He is not an automatic monarch. He can’t change things by orders. He need legislation. As in he need to actually govern. All of his orders can be stopped with the stroke of a pen by a future president and nothing can be done.

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@RobertCFP @kevin_smith45 Finally a correct answer. An executive order cannot go against existing law or the constitution. You have to change it

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@stew_hosk @kevin_smith45 That is not the law that was passed. The law passed had compromises so it could get enough votes.

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@kevin_smith45 33 countries have unconditional birthright citizenship. Google can be your friend

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@AndrewKolvet This a was not the law or text that was passed. If drafts counted then we would have never had slavery as the original draft to the Declaration of Independence. Writers compromise to get a supermajority to agree. What matters is what was agreed upon

[Scott Strange @ScottStrange9]

@JesseBWatters People have been complaining about anchor babies for a long time. You have to amend the constitution. Get started and stop complaining