WE *ARE* the grassroots. Official X profile of the Sheridan Cty, WY Republican Party "An informed patriot is what we want." - Ronald Reagan #wearethegrassroots
Let's take a look at what the Supreme Court held in 1948 (Ludecke v. Watkins) regarding the Alien Enemies Act of 1948:
1.) Due process: As Congress explicitly recognized in the recent Administrative Procedure Act, some statutes "preclude judicial review." Act of June 11, 1946, § 10, 60 Stat. 237, 243. Barring questions of interpretation and constitutionality, the Alien Enemy Act of 1798 is such a statute. Its terms, purpose, and construction leave no doubt. The language employed by the Fifth Congress could hardly be made clearer, or be rendered doubtful, by the incomplete and not always dependable accounts we have of debates in the early years of Congress.
Wyoming Sen. Cynthia Lummis is a backing a bill to lift 90-year-old restrictions on short-barreled rifles and shotguns. A Wyoming firearms law expert agrees, calling the restrictions “silly.”
https://t.co/AAyVRxIJD0
What say you? Are judicial opinions not subject to criticism or question? Are we not allowed to express contrary opinions?
If the Judiciary is independent, aren’t they other two branches, as well?
More than 100 Wyoming attorneys and judges, including a former governor and two former attorneys general, have sent a letter to the Wyoming congressional delegation. They demand Barrasso, Lummis and Hageman denounce recent attacks on judges.
https://t.co/jIcpMxiGjr
A series of combative town halls last week prompted Wyoming congresswoman Harriet Hageman to cancel near-future in-person events. After threats in Laramie and Wheatland last week, there were no fireworks during her Friday phone-in town hall.
https://t.co/iiBLiJc1qi
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called out the Trump Administration's "stupidity" over its handling of Signal messaging. https://t.co/lP2ZLNIT8C
For the sixth issue in a row the @Sheridan_Press has failed to issue a retraction about their absolutely false accusation against the @scwygop. The paper is more concerned with interfering in an election than the truth. #fakenews#politicalactivism
There is an enormous problem in our nation’s military, one that I have not seen discussed in depth elsewhere.
I have heard from multiple sources that many active duty officers openly and deeply despise the Trump Administration, and they are not at all shy about expressing their opinion both in and out of uniform. One active duty major I know estimates that it’s 1 in 4 who have this problem. (Those of you who follow me probably know who that major is, but I’d rather keep that major out of this for his/her own protection.)
This is an astonishingly bad problem. Putting aside for the moment that this is a clear violation of Article 88 of the UCMJ, this is how military coups take place.
I guess I should not be surprised given Mark Milley’s traitorous actions towards his Commander-in-Chief, but the fact that this has permeated to lower levels of the officer corps surprises me and causes me great worry.
For reference, in my 22 years of commissioned service (starting in the late ‘80s), it was virtually impossible to know the political leanings of ANY officer unless they were an extremely close friend. Many officers purposely had no political preferences of any kind. In fact, I knew many officers who refused to even vote because it suggested that they were somehow partisan. This was an ethos that said “We serve under the Constitutional will of the American People; whomever the People select as the Commander-in-Chief is someone to whom I have a duty of absolute loyalty.”
This was a sacred bond, and still is supposed to be.
Apparently it no longer is.
This phenomenon suggests a complete breakdown in good order and discipline across our entire military, and throughout world history has been a precursor to rule by military junta. I am not exaggerating this threat. We cannot allow our military’s officer corps to continue down this path unchecked.
There needs to be a complete reversal of this trend before it’s too late. Pete Hegseth and his team need to get on top of this. But here’s the hard part—it’s not enough to just get these officers to shut their mouths. They need to also re-train their brains and their hearts to deeply understand and accept that they have a duty of loyalty both to the Constitution and the lawful orders of the chain of command the People elect under that Constitution, and that their current thoughts and actions are wholly incompatible with that duty.
I served under Bill Clinton. I know it’s possible because I’ve done it. If these officers cannot do this, they need to be separated from service. It’s better to have vacant officer positions than have them filled with people who are disloyal to their Constitutional duties.
Military officers have a solemn duty to the nation. Too many are ignoring this duty. This must change before it is too late.
🚨 Democrat Senator King just threw a FIT about Tulsi Gabbard no longer considering ��climate change” a national security threat
The climate scam is OVER.
Tulsi responded “We’re focused on the most direct threats to Americans’ safety, well-being, and security.”
Finally 🇺🇸
Democrats have been caught sleeping with spies and keeping classified documents in open garages while their addicted son would come in and out of there with girlfriends. But an American reporter gets put on a group chat and it’s worse than the Pentagon papers? And @realDonaldTrump took accountability today – something Democrats have never done.
@kyledcheney Fail on premise.
It was authorized.
Assumes signal on these devices was set to auto delete messages.
Likely to be dismissed, pretty much immediately.
"On National Medal of Honor Day, it was my Great Honor to recognize our Nation’s BRAVEST HEROES and incredible PATRIOTS who have been awarded the military's highest honor. Thank you!" –President Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸
Yesterday's kerfuffle over the latest Jeffrey Goldberg/Atlantic hit piece proves yet again to never react to leftist attack pieces unless and until the facts are known.
It appears now that the following things are likely true:
1. White House counsel approved the use of Signal for non-classified discussions.
2. The phones the principals used had Signal pre-loaded when issued to them.
3. The Biden Administration used Signal in the exact same way.
4. The conversations Goldberg shared in his Atlantic piece were not classified.
5. Those same conversations discussed how to share classified information separately on classified IT system.
6. Literally the only proof we have that any classified discussions occurred is Goldberg's assertion that the parts of the conversation he withheld from the article were "conceivably" classified.
7. Goldberg is a highly unreliable narrator who has created or participated in multiple wildly inaccurate anti-Trump hoaxes.
8. There are ways to illegally hack Signal which involve cloning a device that is legitimately involved in the conversation. An in-house IT employee could do this with ease as that functionality is purposely built into Signal for user convenience.
Based on the above, my current working theory (yes, it's a THEORY and it could be wrong) is that the Biden White House left a hacker landmine in the system where the very last person who can be trusted with anything involving Trump was invited to a crucial national security discussion.
Illegal? Unethical? Yes.
But so is firebombing Tesla dealerships and fabricating "dossiers" about pee tapes.