He's not just defending AI energy use. He is smuggling in a whole anthropology where humans are basically inefficient meat computers that you have to pour food and years into before they become useful. And once you accept that, the next move is obvious. If people are just costly biological training runs, then burning mountains of electricity to build synthetic intelligence starts to feel not only equal, but superior, even if it negatively impacts actual humans.
That is the dystopian. It makes human development sound like a bug in the system, and it makes sacrificing human and creational flourishing for more computational power sound logical. To him, the grid gets strained, prices go up, ecosystems get hit, but hey, humans eat too, so what's the difference?
The difference is that humans aren't an inefficient line item. They're the point. If your worldview can look at a child growing into an adult and describe it as energy spent to train intelligence, you haven't said something profound. You've revealed a horrifically rotten worldview.
@HeleneTveit1 hvilken fiende er det du snakker om??? bruk av AI er skadelig både for miljøet og kommer til å stjele jobber og ødelegge kulturen vår mye raskere enn innvandrere, eller hva enn d er du er redd for
@darryl17279@RightPulseNewss only 2% of rapists are convicted and imprisoned, so the penalty should be literally nothing happening
(https://t.co/Mf4ZqLD0jW)
They lie more than they breathe. Israelis literally protested for the “right to rape” demanding soldiers be allowed to sexually assault Palestinian detainees.