To all the Catholics that keep saying Peter was the first pope, and therefore by that assertion, the catholic church was formed or at least its beginning is traced back to this biblical reference in Matthew 18, you must consider the truth. Here is the truth:
Biblical Evidence that Christ, Not Peter, is the Foundation:
1.Jesus as the True Rock
•1 Corinthians 3:11 – “For no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ.”
•Ephesians 2:20 – The Church is “built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone.”
•Psalm 118:22 (quoted in Matthew 21:42) – “The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone.” This prophecy refers to Jesus, not Peter.
2.Peter’s Role was Important, but Not Supreme
•Peter was a leader, but he was fallible (Galatians 2:11-14, where Paul rebukes him).
•In Acts 15, the Jerusalem Council was led by James, not Peter, when making doctrinal decisions.
•Matthew 18:18 gives all the apostles—not just Peter—the authority to “bind and loose.”
3.Nowhere Does Scripture Establish a Papacy
•The New Testament describes a shared leadership model, with elders (presbyters) and overseers (bishops) guiding churches (Acts 14:23, Titus 1:5).
•There is no biblical evidence that Peter had exclusive authority or passed on a unique office.
The Catholic Claim is Self-Serving. The idea that Peter was the first pope serves the Catholic Church’s institutional authority, not the actual teachings of Jesus. If Jesus had intended to establish a papal office, we would expect clear, repeated instructions in the New Testament—not a single verse that can be interpreted differently.
The true foundation of the Church is Christ, not Peter. While Peter played a significant role, the claim that he was the first pope is a later theological development, not a biblical doctrine. The authority of the Church comes from Jesus alone, and its true foundation is His identity as the Christ, the Son of the Living God—the very confession Peter made in Matthew 16:16.
@MischelynnScar7@BrendanCarrFCC Post a link for a purchasable drone that has no Chinese comments in it at all….I won’t wait because that’s doesn’t exist. Where is your phone made? You think the drone is worst? Interesting…
@RepScholten He’s not withholding anything you insufferable twit. Such a disingenuous cunt, like all cunts that compose the vast majority of their party.
@CalltoActivism Healthcare? Sex changes for people in Uganda? Or for LGBTQHJUGCXDGSG is Kenya maybe? You should rename the account to CallToLunatics. You insufferable cunts.
@JonesRamsey1@Sadie_NC@NFL Bud Light on 2, break!
Sadly the fans are too drunk and ignorant to hit the billionaire owners where it hurts. They know you all are dumb enough to keep buying their merch and tickets while they make you look like idiots and promote their hippy bullshit ideas and agendas
@AmeliaAmorXOXO@Sadie_NC@NFL Challenging norms? The whole premise of the academia based argument lacks merit and plays on the simple minded, the easily impressionable minded. Yes that’s right, those young adults that enter college wanting education and betterment of life but receive indoctrination.
@JoshEakle When people stop burning down cities, and thinking they can do what they want without consequences. Your side started the fires, stated the killing, fan the fuel of anger. Don’t talk about peaceful conversation now. That time has passed.
@TheViewFromLL2 You dumb motherfucker. You can read or hear can you? Such a fucking idiot. He’s talking about the CHILD INSIDE A PREGNANT WOMAN YOU FUCKING REPULSIVE CUNT! Can you read that?
@bennyjohnson@BarackObama you fanned the fire that @GeorgeWBush31 poured gas on, that is the ramp up of taking away liberties while igniting hate amount the people to cover up your real work. People see you and so many others now, unfortunately, I’m afraid it’s too late.
@ProjectConstitu@elonmusk please sir, don’t let this be taken down. Protect this video. The liberals are trying to frame this as a “fellow conservative” did this to Charlie Kirk.