ghost

Isaiah 1:17 - Amp

[ghost @sdrml8]

@StephenM Yeah maybe cause the American dream is dead 😭😭😭

[ghost @sdrml8]

@fried_kale Is he cooking something as well or

[ghost @sdrml8]

@CoIWick @dadsdad333 @Dplanet My thing is why does it take a white kid dying for you to realise that. Cause there have been plenty people in Henry’s case.

[ghost @sdrml8]

@crt_dean @dadsdad333 @Dplanet Not a separate document, not an inference, not a vibe, evidence that race affected decisions in his case.

Otherwise you’re starting with the conclusion and working backwards.

[ghost @sdrml8]

@crt_dean @dadsdad333 @Dplanet You’re conflating “a race-related policy exists” with “therefore every outcome I dislike was caused by racism against whites.”

If Henry Nowak was treated differently because he was white, show the evidence.

[ghost @sdrml8]

@CoIWick @dadsdad333 @Dplanet You can disagree with the solution, but it’s hard to argue that minorities were receiving easier treatment.

[ghost @sdrml8]

@CoIWick @dadsdad333 @Dplanet If the guidance exists because policymakers thought minorities were more likely to be unfairly arrested, then the guidance itself is evidence that they believed minorities are disadvantaged.

[ghost @sdrml8]

@CoIWick @floki41290828 @dadsdad333 @Dplanet Disagreement on facts and how they are interpreted is called a what?

You guessed it a debate.

If you gave every right to say your shit views, can I not ask you where it came from?

[ghost @sdrml8]

@CoIWick @floki41290828 @dadsdad333 @Dplanet You’re agreeing with him that your claim was factual so indeed you are owed evidence for a claim.

Like it’s basic debating 101

[ghost @sdrml8]

@CoIWick @dadsdad333 @Dplanet But specifically where does it say that from his speech and or your understanding of what the document is…

[ghost @sdrml8]

@CoIWick @dadsdad333 @Dplanet You can argue that the guidance was flawed or encouraged the wrong incentives. That’s a reasonable criticism. But that’s different from proving that officers were trained to be harsher on whites or to ignore crimes committed by minorities.

[ghost @sdrml8]

@NSlugs @Pagan5242 @Dplanet 2. When do you ever hear white people using those slurs as terms of endearment or in a genuinely positive way?

[ghost @sdrml8]

@NSlugs @Pagan5242 @Dplanet 1. This is why I think there’s such a disconnect in these conversations. Yes, context and intent matter in many situations, but racial slurs aren’t just random words with a forgotten historical meaning. They’re still overwhelmingly used as insults or to demean people.

[ghost @sdrml8]

@floki41290828 @CoIWick @dadsdad333 @Dplanet How are you telling me something that blatantly has zero facts behind and not providing evidence to support your point. Especially then going around to tell me to search it? Good lord, can’t believe you can vote mate

[ghost @sdrml8]

@floki41290828 @CoIWick @dadsdad333 @Dplanet Nope.

[ghost @sdrml8]

@Pagan5242 @Dplanet You’re welcome mate, glad we could come to an understanding. Have a great day!

[ghost @sdrml8]

@CoIWick @dadsdad333 @Dplanet Parliament did? Where give me a source.

[ghost @sdrml8]

@crt_dean @dadsdad333 @Dplanet Your like so close, yet so stupidly far

[ghost @sdrml8]

@TopTira @Dplanet We do not have dei training in the UK.

[ghost @sdrml8]

@DanielsPat6665 @Dplanet I disagree with your disagreement, we have seen prime examples of when a certain demographic gets killed by police/ not helped. Multiple times why does it now suddenly require everyone because a white male has lost his life.